mh_parser/scraps/Matt_21_23-Matt_21_27.html

<p>Our Lord Jesus (like St. Paul after him) preached his gospel <i>with much contention</i>; his first appearance was in a dispute with <i>the doctors in the temple, when he was twelve years old</i>; and here, just before he died, we have him engaged in controversy. In this sense, he was like Jeremiah, <i>a man of contention; not striving, but striven with</i>. The great contenders with him, were, <i>the chief priests and the elders</i>, the judges of two distinct courts: the chief priests presided in the ecclesiastical court, in all matters of the Lord, as they are called; the elders of the people were judges of the civil courts, in temporal matters. See an idea of both, <a class="bibleref" title="2Chr.19.5,2Chr.19.8,2Chr.19.11" href="/passage/?search=2Chr.19.5,2Chr.19.8,2Chr.19.11"><span class="bibleref" title="2Chr.19.5">2 Chron. 19:5</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="2Chr.19.8">8</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="2Chr.19.11">11</span></a>. These joined to attack Christ thinking they should find or make him obnoxious either to the one or to the other. See how woefully degenerate that generation was, when the governors both in church and state, who should have been the great promoters of the Messiah’s kingdom, were the great opposers of it! Here we have them disturbing him when he was preaching, <a class="bibleref" title="Matt.21.23" href="/passage/?search=Matt.21.23">Matt. 21:23</a>. They would neither receive his instructions themselves, nor let others receive them. Observe,</p>
<p class="tab-1">I. As soon as he came into Jerusalem, he went to the temple, though he had been affronted there the day before, was there in the midst of enemies and in the mouth of danger; yet thither he went, for there he had a fairer opportunity of doing good to souls than any where else in Jerusalem. Though he came hungry to the city, and was disappointed of a breakfast at the barren fig-tree, yet, for aught that appears, he went straight to the temple, as one that <i>esteemed the words of God’s mouth</i>, the preaching of them, <i>more than his necessary food</i>.</p>
<p class="tab-1">II. In the temple he was teaching; he had called it <i>a house of prayer</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="Matt.21.13" href="/passage/?search=Matt.21.13">Matt. 21:13</a>), and here we have him preaching there. Note, In the solemn assemblies of Christians, praying and preaching must go together, and neither must encroach upon, or jostle out, the other. To make up communion with God, we must not only speak to him in prayer, but hear what he has to say to us by his word; ministers must <i>give themselves both to the word and to prayer</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Acts.6.4" href="/passage/?search=Acts.6.4">Acts 6:4</a>. Now that Christ <i>taught in the temple</i>, that scripture was fulfilled (<a class="bibleref" title="Isa.2.3" href="/passage/?search=Isa.2.3">Isa. 2:3</a>), <i>Let us go up to the house of the Lord, and he will teach us his ways</i>. The priests of old often taught there <i>the good knowledge of the Lord</i>; but they never had such a teacher as this.</p>
<p class="tab-1">III. When Christ was teaching the people, the priests and elders came upon him, and challenged him to produce his orders; the hand of Satan was in this, to hinder him in his work. Note, It cannot but be a trouble to a faithful minister, to be taken off, or diverted from, plain and practical preaching, by an unavoidable necessity of engaging in controversies, yet good was brought out of this evil, for hereby occasion was given to Christ to dispel the objections that were advanced against him, to the greater satisfaction of his followers; and, while his adversaries thought by their power to have silenced him, he by his wisdom silenced them.</p>
<p class="tab-1">Now, in this dispute with them, we may observe,</p>
<p class="tab-1">1. How he was assaulted by their insolent demand; <i>By what authority doest thou these things, and who gave thee this authority</i>? Had they duly considered his miracles, and the power by which he wrought them, they needed not to have asked this question; but they must have something to say for the shelter of an obstinate infidelity. “Thou ridest in triumph into Jerusalem, receivest the hosannas of the people, controllest in the temple, drivest out such as had license to be there, from the rulers of the temple, and paid them rent; thou are here preaching a new doctrine; whence hadst thou a commission to do all this? Was it from Caesar, or from the high priest, or from God? Produce thy warrant, thy credentials. Dost not thou take too much upon thee?” Note, It is good for all that take upon them to act with authority, to put this question to themselves, “Who gave us that authority?” For, unless a man be clear in his own conscience concerning that, he cannot act with any comfort or hope of success. They who run before their warrant, run without their blessing, <a class="bibleref" title="Jer.23.21,Jer.23.22" href="/passage/?search=Jer.23.21,Jer.23.22"><span class="bibleref" title="Jer.23.21">Jer. 23:21</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Jer.23.22">22</span></a>.</p>
<p class="tab-1">Christ had often said it, and proved it beyond contradiction, and Nicodemus, a master in Israel, had owned it, that he was <i>a teacher sent of God</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="John.3.2" href="/passage/?search=John.3.2">John 3:2</a>); yet, at this time of day, when that point had been so fully cleared and settled, they come to him with this question. (1.) In the ostentation of their own power, as chief priests and elders, which they thought authorized them to call him to an account in this manner. How haughtily do they ask, <i>Who gave thee this authority</i>? Intimating that he could have no authority, because he had none from them, <a class="bibleref" title="1Kgs.22.24,Jer.20.1" href="/passage/?search=1Kgs.22.24,Jer.20.1"><span class="bibleref" title="1Kgs.22.24">1 Kgs. 22:24</span>; <span class="bibleref" title="Jer.20.1">Jer. 20:1</span></a>. Note, It is common for the greatest abusers of their power to be the most rigorous assertors of it, and to take a pride and pleasure in any thing that looks like the exercise of it. (2.) It was to ensnare and entangle him. Should he refuse to answer this question, they would enter judgment against him upon <i>Nihil dicit—He says nothing</i>; would condemn him as standing mute; and would insinuate to the people, that his silence was a tacit confessing of himself to be a usurper: should he plead an authority from God, they would, as formerly, demand a sign from heaven, or make his <i>de</i>fence his <i>of</i>fence, and accuse him of blasphemy for it.</p>
<p class="tab-1">2. How he answered this demand with another, which would help them to answer it themselves (<a class="bibleref" title="Matt.21.24,Matt.21.25" href="/passage/?search=Matt.21.24,Matt.21.25"><span class="bibleref" title="Matt.21.24">Matt. 21:24</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Matt.21.25">25</span></a>); <i>I also will ask you one thing</i>. He declined giving them a direct answer, lest they should take advantage against him; but answers them with a question. Those that are <i>as sheep in the midst of wolves</i>, have need to <i>be wise as serpents: the heart of the wise studieth to answer</i>. We must <i>give a reason of the hope that is in us</i>, not only <i>with meekness, but with fear</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="1Pet.3.15" href="/passage/?search=1Pet.3.15">1 Pet. 3:15</a>), with prudent caution, lest truth be damaged, or ourselves endangered.</p>
<p class="tab-1">Now this question is concerning John’s baptism, here put for his whole ministry, preaching as well as baptizing; “Was this <i>from heaven, or of men</i>? One of the two it must be; either what he did was of his own head, or he was sent of God to do it.” Gamaliel’s argument turned upon this hinge (<a class="bibleref" title="Acts.5.38,Acts.5.39" href="/passage/?search=Acts.5.38,Acts.5.39"><span class="bibleref" title="Acts.5.38">Acts 5:38</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Acts.5.39">39</span></a>); either <i>this counsel is of men or of God</i>. Though that which is manifestly bad cannot be of God, yet that which is seemingly good may be of men, nay of Satan, when <i>he transforms himself into an angel of light</i>. This question was not at all shuffling, to evade theirs; but,</p>
<p class="tab-1">(1.) If they answered this question, it would answer theirs: should they say, against their consciences, that John’s baptism was of men, yet it would be easy to answer, <i>John did no miracle</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="John.10.41" href="/passage/?search=John.10.41">John 10:41</a>), Christ did many; but should they say, as they could not but own, that John’s baptism was from heaven (which was supposed in the questions sent him, <a class="bibleref" title="John.1.21" href="/passage/?search=John.1.21">John 1:21</a>; <i>Art thou Elias, or that prophet</i>?) then their demand was answered, for he bare testimony to Christ. Note, Truths appear in the clearest light when they are taken in their due order; the resolving of the <i>previous</i> questions will be a key to the <i>main</i> question.</p>
<p class="tab-1">(2.) If they refused to answer it, that would be a good reason why he should not offer proofs of his authority to men that were obstinately prejudiced against the strongest conviction; it was but to cast pearls before swine. Thus <i>he taketh the wise in their own craftiness</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="1Cor.3.19" href="/passage/?search=1Cor.3.19">1 Cor. 3:19</a>); and those that would not be convinced of the plainest truths, shall be convicted of the vilest malice, against John first, then against Christ, and in both against God.</p>
<p class="tab-1">3. How they were hereby baffled and run aground; they knew the truth, but would not own it, and so were taken in the snare they laid for our Lord Jesus. Observe,</p>
<p class="tab-1">(1.) How <i>they reasoned with themselves</i>, not concerning the merits of the cause, what proofs there were of the divine original of John’s baptism; no, their care was, how to make their part good against Christ. Two things they considered and consulted, in this reasoning with themselves—their credit, and their safety; the same things which <i>they</i> principally aim at, who <i>seek their own things</i>.</p>
<p class="tab-1">[1.] They consider their own credit, which they would endanger if they should own John’s baptism to be of God; for then Christ would ask them, before all the people. <i>Why did ye not believe him</i>? And to acknowledge that a doctrine is from God, and yet not to receive and entertain it, is the greatest absurdity and iniquity that a man can be charged with. Many that will not be kept by the fear of sin from neglecting and opposing that which they know to be true and good are kept by the fear of shame from owning that to be true and good which they neglect and oppose. Thus they <i>reject the counsel of God against themselves</i>, in not submitting to John’s baptism, and are left without excuse.</p>
<p class="tab-1">[2.] They consider their own safety, that they would expose themselves to the resentments of the people, if they should say that John’s baptism was of men; <i>We fear the people, for all hold John as a prophet</i>. It seems, then, <i>First</i>, That the people had truer sentiments of John than the chief priests and the elders had, or, at least, were more free and faithful in declaring their sentiments. This people, of whom they said in their pride that they <i>knew not the law, and were cursed</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="John.7.49" href="/passage/?search=John.7.49">John 7:49</a>), it seems, knew the gospel, and were blessed. <i>Secondly</i>, That the chief priests and elders stood in awe of the common people, which is an evidence that things were in disorder among them, and that mutual jealousies were at a great height; that the government was become obnoxious to the hatred and scorn of the people, and the scripture was fulfilled, <i>I have made you contemptible and base</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Mal.2.8,Mal.2.9" href="/passage/?search=Mal.2.8,Mal.2.9"><span class="bibleref" title="Mal.2.8">Mal. 2:8</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Mal.2.9">9</span></a>. If they had kept their integrity, and done their duty, they had kept up their authority, and needed not to fear the people. We find sometimes that the people feared them, and it served them for a reason why they did not confess Christ, <a class="bibleref" title="John.9.22,John.12.42" href="/passage/?search=John.9.22,John.12.42"><span class="bibleref" title="John.9.22">John 9:22</span>; <span class="bibleref" title="John.12.42">12:42</span></a>. Note, Those could not but fear the people, who studied only how to make the people fear them. <i>Thirdly</i>, That it is usually the temper even of common people to be zealous for the honour of that which they account sacred and divine. If they <i>account John as a prophet</i>, they will not endure that it should be said, <i>His baptism was of men</i>; hence the hottest contests have been about holy things. <i>Fourthly</i>, That the chief priests and elders were kept from an open denial of the truth, even against the conviction of their own minds, not by the fear of God, but purely by the fear of the people; as the <i>fear of man</i> may <i>bring</i> good people into <i>a snare</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="Prov.29.25" href="/passage/?search=Prov.29.25">Prov. 29:25</a>), so sometimes it may keep bad people from being <i>overmuch wicked, lest they should die before their time</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Eccl.7.17" href="/passage/?search=Eccl.7.17">Eccl. 7:17</a>. Many bad people would be much worse than they are, if they durst.</p>
<p class="tab-1">(2.) How they replied to our Saviour, and so dropped the question. They fairly confessed <i>We cannot tell</i>; that is, “We will not;” <b><i>ouk oi damen</i></b>—<i>We never knew</i>. The more shame for them, while they pretended to be leaders of the people, and by their office were obliged to take cognizance of such things; when they would not confess their knowledge, they were constrained to confess their ignorance. And observe, by the way, when they said, <i>We cannot tell</i>, they told a lie, for they knew that John’s baptism was of God. Note, There are many who are more afraid of the <i>shame</i> of lying than of the <i>sin</i>, and therefore scruple not to speak that which they know to be false concerning their own thoughts and apprehensions, their affections and intentions, or their remembering or forgetting of things, because in those things they know nobody can disprove them.</p>
<p class="tab-1">Thus Christ avoided the snare they laid for him, and justified himself in refusing to gratify them; <i>Neither tell I you by what authority I do these things</i>. If they be so wicked and base as either not to believe, or not to confess, that the baptism of John was from heaven (though it obliged to repentance, that great duty, and sealed the kingdom of God at hand, that great promise), they were not fit to be discoursed with concerning Christ’s authority; for men of such a disposition could not be convinced of the truth, nay, they could not but be provoked by it, and therefore <i>he that is thus ignorant, let him be ignorant still</i>. Note, Those that imprison the truths they know, in unrighteousness (either by not professing them, or by not practising according to them), are justly denied the further truths they enquire after, <a class="bibleref" title="Rom.1.18,Rom.1.19" href="/passage/?search=Rom.1.18,Rom.1.19"><span class="bibleref" title="Rom.1.18">Rom. 1:18</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Rom.1.19">19</span></a>. Take away the talent from him that buried it; those that <i>will not</i> see, <i>shall not</i> see.</p>