mh_parser/scraps/Gen_29_15-Gen_29_30.html
2023-12-17 15:08:46 -05:00

5 lines
8.4 KiB
HTML
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

<p>Here is, I. The fair contract made between Laban and Jacob, during the month that Jacob spent there as a guest, <a class="bibleref" title="Gen.29.14" href="/passage/?search=Gen.29.14">Gen. 29:14</a>. It seems he was not idle, nor did he spend his time in sport and pastime; but like a man of business, though he had no stock of his own, he applied himself to serve his uncle, as he had begun (<a class="bibleref" title="Gen.29.10" href="/passage/?search=Gen.29.10">Gen. 29:10</a>) when he <i>watered his flock</i>. Note, Wherever we are, it is good to be employing ourselves in some useful business, which will turn to a good account to ourselves or others. Laban, it seems, was so taken with Jacobs ingenuity and industry about his flocks that he was desirous he should continue with him, and very fairly reasons thus: “<i>Because thou art my brother, shouldst thou therefore serve me for nought</i>? <a class="bibleref" title="Gen.29.15" href="/passage/?search=Gen.29.15">Gen. 29:15</a>. No, what reason for that?” If Jacob be so respectful to his uncle as to give him his service without demanding any consideration for it, yet Laban will not be so unjust to his nephew as to take advantage either of his necessity or of his good-nature. Note, Inferior relations must not be imposed upon; if it be their duty to serve us, it is our duty to reward them. Now Jacob had a fair opportunity to make known to Laban the affection he had for his daughter Rachel; and, having no worldly goods in his hand with which to endow her, he promises him seven years service, upon condition that, at the end of the seven years, he would bestow her upon him for his wife. It appears by computation that Jacob was now seventy-seven years old when he bound himself apprentice for a wife, <i>and for a wife he kept sheep</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Hos.12.12" href="/passage/?search=Hos.12.12">Hos. 12:12</a>. His posterity are there reminded of it long afterwards, as an instance of the meanness of their origin: probably Rachel was young, and scarcely marriageable, when Jacob first came, which made him the more willing to stay for her till his seven years service had expired.</p>
<p class="tab-1">II. Jacobs honest performance of his part of the bargain, <a class="bibleref" title="Gen.29.20" href="/passage/?search=Gen.29.20">Gen. 29:20</a>. He served seven years for Rachel. If Rachel still continued to keep her fathers sheep (as she did, <a class="bibleref" title="Gen.29.9" href="/passage/?search=Gen.29.9">Gen. 29:9</a>), his innocent and religious conversation with her, while they kept the flocks, could not but increase their mutual acquaintance and affection (Solomons song of love is a pastoral); if she now left it off, his easing her of that care was very obliging. Jacob honestly served out his seven years, and did not forfeit his indentures, though he was old; nay, he served them cheerfully: <i>They seemed to him but a few days, for the love he had to her</i>, as if it were more his desire to earn her than to have her. Note, Love makes long and hard services short and easy; hence we read of <i>the labour of love</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Heb.6.10" href="/passage/?search=Heb.6.10">Heb. 6:10</a>. If we know how to value the happiness of heaven, the sufferings of this present time will be as nothing to us in comparison of it. An age of work will be but as a few days to those that love God and long for Christs appearing.</p>
<p class="tab-1">III. The base cheat which Laban put upon him when he was out of his time: he put Leah into his arms instead of Rachel, <a class="bibleref" title="Gen.29.23" href="/passage/?search=Gen.29.23">Gen. 29:23</a>. This was Labans sin; he wronged both Jacob and Rachel, whose affections, doubtless, were engaged to each other, and, if (as some say) Leah was herein no better than an adulteress, it was no small wrong to her too. But it was Jacobs affliction, a damp to the mirth of the marriage-feast, when in the morning behold it was Leah, <a class="bibleref" title="Gen.29.25" href="/passage/?search=Gen.29.25">Gen. 29:25</a>. It is easy to observe here how Jacob was paid in his own coin. He had cheated his own father when he pretended to be Esau, and now his father-in-law cheated him. Herein, how unrighteous soever Laban was, the Lord was righteous; as <a class="bibleref" title="Judg.1.7" href="/passage/?search=Judg.1.7">Jdg. 1:7</a>. Even the righteous, if they take a false step, are sometimes thus recompensed on the earth. Many that are not, like Jacob, disappointed in the person, soon find themselves, as much to their grief, disappointed in the character. The choice of that relation therefore, on both sides, ought to be made with good advice and consideration, that, if there should be a disappointment, it may not be aggravated by a consciousness of mismanagement.</p>
<p class="tab-1">IV. The excuse and atonement Laban made for the cheat. 1. The excuse was frivolous: <i>It must not be so done in our country</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Gen.29.26" href="/passage/?search=Gen.29.26">Gen. 29:26</a>. We have reason to think there was no such custom of his country as he pretends; only he banters Jacob with it, and laughs at his mistake. Note, Those that can do wickedly and then think to turn it off with a jest, though they may deceive themselves and others, will find at last that God is not mocked. But if there had been such a custom, and he had resolved to observe it, he should have told Jacob so when he undertook to serve him for his younger daughter. Note, As saith the proverb of the ancients, <i>Wickedness proceeds from the wicked</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="1Sam.24.13" href="/passage/?search=1Sam.24.13">1 Sam. 24:13</a>. Those that deal with treacherous men must expect to be dealt treacherously with. 2. His compounding the matter did but make bad worse: <i>We will give thee this also</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Gen.29.27" href="/passage/?search=Gen.29.27">Gen. 29:27</a>. Hereby he drew Jacob into the sin, and snare, and disquiet, of multiplying wives, which remains a blot in his escutcheon, and will be so to the end of the world. Honest Jacob did not design it, but to have kept as true to Rachel as his father had done to Rebekah. He that had lived without a wife to the eighty-fourth year of his age could then have been very well content with one; but Laban, to dispose of his two daughters without portions, and to get seven years service more out of Jacob, thus imposes upon him, and draws him into such a strait by his fraud, that (the matter not being yet settled, as it was afterwards by the divine law, <a class="bibleref" title="Lev.18.18" href="/passage/?search=Lev.18.18">Lev. 18:18</a>; and more fully since by our Saviour, <a class="bibleref" title="Matt.19.5" href="/passage/?search=Matt.19.5">Matt. 19:5</a>) he had some colourable reasons for marrying them both. He could not refuse Rachel, for he had espoused her; still less could he refuse Leah, for he had married her; and therefore Jacob must <i>be content, and take two talents</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="2Kgs.5.23" href="/passage/?search=2Kgs.5.23">2 Kgs. 5:23</a>. Note, One sin is commonly the inlet of another. Those that go in by one door of wickedness seldom find their way out but by another. The polygamy of the patriarchs was, in some measure, excusable in them, because, though there was a reason against it as ancient as Adams marriage (<a class="bibleref" title="Mal.2.15" href="/passage/?search=Mal.2.15">Mal. 2:15</a>), yet there was no express command against it; it was in them a sin of ignorance. It was not the product of any sinful lust, but for the building up of the church, which was the good that Providence brought out of it; but it will by no means justify the like practice now, when Gods will is plainly made known, that one man and one woman only must be joined together, <a class="bibleref" title="1Cor.7.2" href="/passage/?search=1Cor.7.2">1 Cor. 7:2</a>. The having of many wives suits well enough with the carnal sensual spirit of the Mahomedan imposture, which allows it; but we have not so learned Christ. Dr. Lightfoot makes Leah and Rachel to be figures of the two churches, the Jews under the law and the Gentiles under the gospel: the younger the more beautiful, and more in the thoughts of Christ when he came in the form of a servant; but he other, like Leah, first embraced: yet in this the allegory does not hold, that the Gentiles, the younger, were more fruitful, <a class="bibleref" title="Gal.4.27" href="/passage/?search=Gal.4.27">Gal. 4:27</a>.</p>