mh_parser/scraps/Lev_13_1-Lev_13_17.html

<p>I. Concerning the plague of leprosy we may observe in general, 1. That it was rather an uncleanness than a disease; or, at least, so the law considered it, and therefore employed not the physicians but the priests about it. Christ is said to cleanse lepers, not to cure them. We do not read of any that died of the leprosy, but it rather buried them alive, by rendering them unfit for conversation with any but such as were infected like themselves. Yet there is a tradition that Pharaoh, who sought to kill Moses, was the first that ever was struck with this disease, and that he died of it. It is said to have begun first in Egypt, whence it spread into Syria. It was very well known to Moses, when he put his own hand into his bosom and took it out leprous. 2. That it was a plague inflicted immediately by the hand of God, and came not from natural causes, as other diseases; and therefore must be managed according to a divine law. Miriam’s leprosy, and Gehazi’s, and king Uzziah’s, were all the punishments of particular sins: and, if generally it was so, no marvel there was so much care taken to distinguish it from a common distemper, that none might be looked upon as lying under this extraordinary token of divine displeasure but those that really were so. 3. That it is a plague not now known in the world; what is commonly called the leprosy is of a quite different nature. This seems to have been reserved as a particular scourge for the sinners of those times and places. The Jews retained the idolatrous customs they had learnt in Egypt, and therefore God justly caused this with some others of the diseases of Egypt to follow them. Yet we read of Naaman the Syrian, who was a leper, <a class="bibleref" title="2Kgs.5.1" href="/passage/?search=2Kgs.5.1">2 Kgs. 5:1</a>. 4. That there were other breakings-out in the body which did very much resemble the leprosy, but were not it, which might make a man sore and loathsome and yet not ceremonially unclean. Justly are our bodies called vile bodies, which have in them the seeds of so many diseases, by which the lives of so many are made bitter to them. 5. That the judgment of it was referred to the priests. Lepers were looked upon as stigmatized by the justice of God, and therefore it was left to his servants the priests, who might be presumed to know his mark best, to pronounce who were lepers and who were not. All the Jews say, “Any priest, though disabled by a blemish to attend the sanctuary, might be a judge of the leprosy, provided the blemish were not in his eye. And he might” (they say) “take a common person to assist him in the search, but the priest only must pronounce the judgment.” 6. That it was a figure of the moral pollution of men’s minds by sin, which is the leprosy of the soul, defiling to the conscience, and from which Christ alone can cleanse us; for herein the power of his grace infinitely transcends that of the legal priesthood, that the priest could only convict the leper (for by the law is the knowledge of sin), but Christ can cure the leper, he can take away sin. <i>Lord, if thou wilt, thou canst make me clean</i>, which was more than the priests could do, <a class="bibleref" title="Matt.8.2" href="/passage/?search=Matt.8.2">Matt. 8:2</a>. Some think that the leprosy signified, not so much sin in general as a state of sin, by which men are separated from God (their spot not being the spot of God’s children), and scandalous sin, for which men are to be shut out from the communion of the faithful. It is a work of great importance, but of great difficulty, to judge of our spiritual state: we have all cause to suspect ourselves, being conscious to ourselves of sores and spots, but whether clean or unclean is the question. A man might have a scab (<a class="bibleref" title="Lev.13.6" href="/passage/?search=Lev.13.6">Lev. 13:6</a>) and yet be clean: the best have their infirmities; but, as there were certain marks by which to know that it was a leprosy, so there are characters of such as are in the gall of bitterness, and the work of ministers is to declare the judgment of leprosy and to assist those that suspect themselves in the trial of their spiritual state, remitting or retaining sin. And hence the keys of the kingdom of heaven are said to be given to them, because they are to separate between the precious and the vile, and to judge who are fit as clean to partake of the holy things and who as unclean must be debarred from them.</p>
<p class="tab-1">II. Several rules are here laid down by which the judgment of the priest must be governed. 1. If the sore was but <i>skin-deep</i>, it was to be hoped it was not the <i>leprosy</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Lev.13.4" href="/passage/?search=Lev.13.4">Lev. 13:4</a>. But, if it was <i>deeper than the skin</i>, the man must be pronounced unclean, <a class="bibleref" title="Lev.13.3" href="/passage/?search=Lev.13.3">Lev. 13:3</a>. The infirmities that consist with grace do not sink deep into the soul, but <i>the mind</i> still <i>serves the law of God</i>, and the <i>inward man delights in it</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Rom.7.22,Rom.7.25" href="/passage/?search=Rom.7.22,Rom.7.25"><span class="bibleref" title="Rom.7.22">Rom. 7:22</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Rom.7.25">25</span></a>. But if the matter be really worse than it shows, and the inwards be infected, the case is dangerous. 2. If the sore <i>be at a stay</i>, and do not <i>spread</i>, it is no leprosy, <a class="bibleref" title="Lev.13.4,Lev.13.5" href="/passage/?search=Lev.13.4,Lev.13.5"><span class="bibleref" title="Lev.13.4">Lev. 13:4</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Lev.13.5">5</span></a>. But if it <i>spread much abroad</i>, and continue to do so after several inspections, the case is bad, <a class="bibleref" title="Lev.13.7,Lev.13.8" href="/passage/?search=Lev.13.7,Lev.13.8"><span class="bibleref" title="Lev.13.7">Lev. 13:7</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Lev.13.8">8</span></a>. If men do not grow worse, but a stop be put to the course of their sins and their corruptions be checked, it is to be hoped they will grow better; but if sin get ground, and they become worse every day, they are going downhill. 3. If there was <i>proud raw flesh</i> in the rising, the priest needed not to wait any longer, it was certainly a leprosy, <a class="bibleref" title="Lev.13.10,Lev.13.11" href="/passage/?search=Lev.13.10,Lev.13.11"><span class="bibleref" title="Lev.13.10">Lev. 13:10</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Lev.13.11">11</span></a>. Nor is there any surer indication of the badness of a man’s spiritual state than the heart’s rising in self-conceit, confidence in the flesh, and resistance of the reproofs of the word and strivings of the Spirit. 4. If the eruption, whatever it was, <i>covered all the skin</i> from head to foot, it was no leprosy (<a class="bibleref" title="Lev.13.12,Lev.13.13" href="/passage/?search=Lev.13.12,Lev.13.13"><span class="bibleref" title="Lev.13.12">Lev. 13:12</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Lev.13.13">13</span></a>); for it was an evidence that the vitals were sound and strong, and nature hereby helped itself, throwing out what was burdensome and pernicious. There is hope in the small-pox when they come out well: so if men freely confess their sins, and hide them not, there is no danger comparable to theirs that cover their sins. Some gather this from it, that there is more hope of the profane than of hypocrites. The publicans and harlots went into the kingdom of heaven before scribes and Pharisees. In one respect, the sudden breakings-out of passion, though bad enough, are not so dangerous as malice concealed. Others gather this, that, if we judge ourselves, we shall not be judged; if we see and own that there is <i>no health in us, no soundness in our flesh</i>, by reason of sin, we shall <i>find grace in the eyes of the Lord</i>. 5. The priest must take time in making his judgment, and not give it rashly. If the matter looked suspicious, he must shut up the patient seven days, and then seven days more, that his judgment might be <i>according to truth</i>. This teaches all, both ministers and people, not to be hasty in their censures, nor to judge any thing <i>before the time</i>. If <i>some men’s sins go before unto judgment</i>, the sins of others <i>follow after</i>, and so men’s good works; therefore let nothing be done <i>suddenly</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="1Tim.5.22,1Tim.5.24,1Tim.5.25" href="/passage/?search=1Tim.5.22,1Tim.5.24,1Tim.5.25"><span class="bibleref" title="1Tim.5.22">1 Tim. 5:22</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="1Tim.5.24">24</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="1Tim.5.25">25</span></a>. 6. If the person suspected was found to be clean, yet he must <i>wash his clothes</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="Lev.13.6" href="/passage/?search=Lev.13.6">Lev. 13:6</a>), because he had been under the suspicion, and there had been in him that which gave ground for the suspicion. Even the prisoner that is acquitted must go down on his knees. We have need to be washed in the blood of Christ from our spots, though they be not leprosy-spots; for who can say, <i>I am pure from sin</i>? though there are those who through grace are <i>innocent from the great transgression</i>.18 The flesh also, in which, <i>even</i> in the skin thereof, was a boil, and is healed, 19 And in the place of the boil there be a white rising, or a bright spot, white, and somewhat reddish, and it be showed to the priest; 20 And if, when the priest seeth it, behold, it <i>be</i> in sight lower than the skin, and the hair thereof be turned white; the priest shall pronounce him unclean: it <i>is</i> a plague of leprosy broken out of the boil. 21 But if the priest look on it, and, behold, <i>there be</i> no white hairs therein, and <i>if</i> it <i>be</i> not lower than the skin, but <i>be</i> somewhat dark; then the priest shall shut him up seven days: 22 And if it spread much abroad in the skin, then the priest shall pronounce him unclean: it <i>is</i> a plague. 23 But if the bright spot stay in his place, <i>and</i> spread not, it <i>is</i> a burning boil; and the priest shall pronounce him clean. 24 Or if there be <i>any</i> flesh, in the skin whereof <i>there is</i> a hot burning, and the quick <i>flesh</i> that burneth have a white bright spot, somewhat reddish, or white; 25 Then the priest shall look upon it: and, behold, <i>if</i> the hair in the bright spot be turned white, and it <i>be in</i> sight deeper than the skin; it <i>is</i> a leprosy broken out of the burning: wherefore the priest shall pronounce him unclean: it <i>is</i> the plague of leprosy. 26 But if the priest look on it, and, behold, <i>there be</i> no white hair in the bright spot, and it <i>be</i> no lower than the <i>other</i> skin, but <i>be</i> somewhat dark; then the priest shall shut him up seven days: 27 And the priest shall look upon him the seventh day: <i>and</i> if it be spread much abroad in the skin, then the priest shall pronounce him unclean: it <i>is</i> the plague of leprosy. 28 And if the bright spot stay in his place, <i>and</i> spread not in the skin, but it <i>be</i> somewhat dark; it <i>is</i> a rising of the burning, and the priest shall pronounce him clean: for it <i>is</i> an inflammation of the burning. 29 If a man or woman have a plague upon the head or the beard; 30 Then the priest shall see the plague: and, behold, if it <i>be</i> in sight deeper than the skin; <i>and there be</i> in it a yellow thin hair; then the priest shall pronounce him unclean: it <i>is</i> a dry scall, <i>even</i> a leprosy upon the head or beard. 31 And if the priest look on the plague of the scall, and, behold, it <i>be</i> not in sight deeper than the skin, and <i>that there is</i> no black hair in it; then the priest shall shut up <i>him that hath</i> the plague of the scall seven days: 32 And in the seventh day the priest shall look on the plague: and, behold, <i>if</i> the scall spread not, and there be in it no yellow hair, and the scall <i>be</i> not in sight deeper than the skin; 33 He shall be shaven, but the scall shall he not shave; and the priest shall shut up <i>him that hath</i> the scall seven days more: 34 And in the seventh day the priest shall look on the scall: and, behold, <i>if</i> the scall be not spread in the skin, nor <i>be</i> in sight deeper than the skin; then the priest shall pronounce him clean: and he shall wash his clothes, and be clean. 35 But if the scall spread much in the skin after his cleansing; 36 Then the priest shall look on him: and, behold, if the scall be spread in the skin, the priest shall not seek for yellow hair; he <i>is</i> unclean. 37 But if the scall be in his sight at a stay, and <i>that</i> there is black hair grown up therein; the scall is healed, he <i>is</i> clean: and the priest shall pronounce him clean. </p>
		<p>I. Concerning the plague of leprosy we may observe in general, 1. That it was rather an uncleanness than a disease; or, at least, so the law considered it, and therefore employed not the physicians but the priests about it. Christ is said to cleanse lepers, not to cure them. We do not read of any that died of the leprosy, but it rather buried them alive, by rendering them unfit for conversation with any but such as were infected like themselves. Yet there is a tradition that Pharaoh, who sought to kill Moses, was the first that ever was struck with this disease, and that he died of it. It is said to have begun first in Egypt, whence it spread into Syria. It was very well known to Moses, when he put his own hand into his bosom and took it out leprous. 2. That it was a plague inflicted immediately by the hand of God, and came not from natural causes, as other diseases; and therefore must be managed according to a divine law. Miriam’s leprosy, and Gehazi’s, and king Uzziah’s, were all the punishments of particular sins: and, if generally it was so, no marvel there was so much care taken to distinguish it from a common distemper, that none might be looked upon as lying under this extraordinary token of divine displeasure but those that really were so. 3. That it is a plague not now known in the world; what is commonly called the leprosy is of a quite different nature. This seems to have been reserved as a particular scourge for the sinners of those times and places. The Jews retained the idolatrous customs they had learnt in Egypt, and therefore God justly caused this with some others of the diseases of Egypt to follow them. Yet we read of Naaman the Syrian, who was a leper, <a class="bibleref" title="2Kgs.5.1" href="/passage/?search=2Kgs.5.1">2 Kgs. 5:1</a>. 4. That there were other breakings-out in the body which did very much resemble the leprosy, but were not it, which might make a man sore and loathsome and yet not ceremonially unclean. Justly are our bodies called vile bodies, which have in them the seeds of so many diseases, by which the lives of so many are made bitter to them. 5. That the judgment of it was referred to the priests. Lepers were looked upon as stigmatized by the justice of God, and therefore it was left to his servants the priests, who might be presumed to know his mark best, to pronounce who were lepers and who were not. All the Jews say, “Any priest, though disabled by a blemish to attend the sanctuary, might be a judge of the leprosy, provided the blemish were not in his eye. And he might” (they say) “take a common person to assist him in the search, but the priest only must pronounce the judgment.” 6. That it was a figure of the moral pollution of men’s minds by sin, which is the leprosy of the soul, defiling to the conscience, and from which Christ alone can cleanse us; for herein the power of his grace infinitely transcends that of the legal priesthood, that the priest could only convict the leper (for by the law is the knowledge of sin), but Christ can cure the leper, he can take away sin. <i>Lord, if thou wilt, thou canst make me clean</i>, which was more than the priests could do, <a class="bibleref" title="Matt.8.2" href="/passage/?search=Matt.8.2">Matt. 8:2</a>. Some think that the leprosy signified, not so much sin in general as a state of sin, by which men are separated from God (their spot not being the spot of God’s children), and scandalous sin, for which men are to be shut out from the communion of the faithful. It is a work of great importance, but of great difficulty, to judge of our spiritual state: we have all cause to suspect ourselves, being conscious to ourselves of sores and spots, but whether clean or unclean is the question. A man might have a scab (<a class="bibleref" title="Lev.13.6" href="/passage/?search=Lev.13.6">Lev. 13:6</a>) and yet be clean: the best have their infirmities; but, as there were certain marks by which to know that it was a leprosy, so there are characters of such as are in the gall of bitterness, and the work of ministers is to declare the judgment of leprosy and to assist those that suspect themselves in the trial of their spiritual state, remitting or retaining sin. And hence the keys of the kingdom of heaven are said to be given to them, because they are to separate between the precious and the vile, and to judge who are fit as clean to partake of the holy things and who as unclean must be debarred from them.</p>
		<p class="tab-1">II. Several rules are here laid down by which the judgment of the priest must be governed. 1. If the sore was but <i>skin-deep</i>, it was to be hoped it was not the <i>leprosy</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Lev.13.4" href="/passage/?search=Lev.13.4">Lev. 13:4</a>. But, if it was <i>deeper than the skin</i>, the man must be pronounced unclean, <a class="bibleref" title="Lev.13.3" href="/passage/?search=Lev.13.3">Lev. 13:3</a>. The infirmities that consist with grace do not sink deep into the soul, but <i>the mind</i> still <i>serves the law of God</i>, and the <i>inward man delights in it</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Rom.7.22,Rom.7.25" href="/passage/?search=Rom.7.22,Rom.7.25"><span class="bibleref" title="Rom.7.22">Rom. 7:22</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Rom.7.25">25</span></a>. But if the matter be really worse than it shows, and the inwards be infected, the case is dangerous. 2. If the sore <i>be at a stay</i>, and do not <i>spread</i>, it is no leprosy, <a class="bibleref" title="Lev.13.4,Lev.13.5" href="/passage/?search=Lev.13.4,Lev.13.5"><span class="bibleref" title="Lev.13.4">Lev. 13:4</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Lev.13.5">5</span></a>. But if it <i>spread much abroad</i>, and continue to do so after several inspections, the case is bad, <a class="bibleref" title="Lev.13.7,Lev.13.8" href="/passage/?search=Lev.13.7,Lev.13.8"><span class="bibleref" title="Lev.13.7">Lev. 13:7</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Lev.13.8">8</span></a>. If men do not grow worse, but a stop be put to the course of their sins and their corruptions be checked, it is to be hoped they will grow better; but if sin get ground, and they become worse every day, they are going downhill. 3. If there was <i>proud raw flesh</i> in the rising, the priest needed not to wait any longer, it was certainly a leprosy, <a class="bibleref" title="Lev.13.10,Lev.13.11" href="/passage/?search=Lev.13.10,Lev.13.11"><span class="bibleref" title="Lev.13.10">Lev. 13:10</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Lev.13.11">11</span></a>. Nor is there any surer indication of the badness of a man’s spiritual state than the heart’s rising in self-conceit, confidence in the flesh, and resistance of the reproofs of the word and strivings of the Spirit. 4. If the eruption, whatever it was, <i>covered all the skin</i> from head to foot, it was no leprosy (<a class="bibleref" title="Lev.13.12,Lev.13.13" href="/passage/?search=Lev.13.12,Lev.13.13"><span class="bibleref" title="Lev.13.12">Lev. 13:12</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Lev.13.13">13</span></a>); for it was an evidence that the vitals were sound and strong, and nature hereby helped itself, throwing out what was burdensome and pernicious. There is hope in the small-pox when they come out well: so if men freely confess their sins, and hide them not, there is no danger comparable to theirs that cover their sins. Some gather this from it, that there is more hope of the profane than of hypocrites. The publicans and harlots went into the kingdom of heaven before scribes and Pharisees. In one respect, the sudden breakings-out of passion, though bad enough, are not so dangerous as malice concealed. Others gather this, that, if we judge ourselves, we shall not be judged; if we see and own that there is <i>no health in us, no soundness in our flesh</i>, by reason of sin, we shall <i>find grace in the eyes of the Lord</i>. 5. The priest must take time in making his judgment, and not give it rashly. If the matter looked suspicious, he must shut up the patient seven days, and then seven days more, that his judgment might be <i>according to truth</i>. This teaches all, both ministers and people, not to be hasty in their censures, nor to judge any thing <i>before the time</i>. If <i>some men’s sins go before unto judgment</i>, the sins of others <i>follow after</i>, and so men’s good works; therefore let nothing be done <i>suddenly</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="1Tim.5.22,1Tim.5.24,1Tim.5.25" href="/passage/?search=1Tim.5.22,1Tim.5.24,1Tim.5.25"><span class="bibleref" title="1Tim.5.22">1 Tim. 5:22</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="1Tim.5.24">24</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="1Tim.5.25">25</span></a>. 6. If the person suspected was found to be clean, yet he must <i>wash his clothes</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="Lev.13.6" href="/passage/?search=Lev.13.6">Lev. 13:6</a>), because he had been under the suspicion, and there had been in him that which gave ground for the suspicion. Even the prisoner that is acquitted must go down on his knees. We have need to be washed in the blood of Christ from our spots, though they be not leprosy-spots; for who can say, <i>I am pure from sin</i>? though there are those who through grace are <i>innocent from the great transgression</i>.18 The flesh also, in which, <i>even</i> in the skin thereof, was a boil, and is healed, 19 And in the place of the boil there be a white rising, or a bright spot, white, and somewhat reddish, and it be showed to the priest; 20 And if, when the priest seeth it, behold, it <i>be</i> in sight lower than the skin, and the hair thereof be turned white; the priest shall pronounce him unclean: it <i>is</i> a plague of leprosy broken out of the boil. 21 But if the priest look on it, and, behold, <i>there be</i> no white hairs therein, and <i>if</i> it <i>be</i> not lower than the skin, but <i>be</i> somewhat dark; then the priest shall shut him up seven days: 22 And if it spread much abroad in the skin, then the priest shall pronounce him unclean: it <i>is</i> a plague. 23 But if the bright spot stay in his place, <i>and</i> spread not, it <i>is</i> a burning boil; and the priest shall pronounce him clean. 24 Or if there be <i>any</i> flesh, in the skin whereof <i>there is</i> a hot burning, and the quick <i>flesh</i> that burneth have a white bright spot, somewhat reddish, or white; 25 Then the priest shall look upon it: and, behold, <i>if</i> the hair in the bright spot be turned white, and it <i>be in</i> sight deeper than the skin; it <i>is</i> a leprosy broken out of the burning: wherefore the priest shall pronounce him unclean: it <i>is</i> the plague of leprosy. 26 But if the priest look on it, and, behold, <i>there be</i> no white hair in the bright spot, and it <i>be</i> no lower than the <i>other</i> skin, but <i>be</i> somewhat dark; then the priest shall shut him up seven days: 27 And the priest shall look upon him the seventh day: <i>and</i> if it be spread much abroad in the skin, then the priest shall pronounce him unclean: it <i>is</i> the plague of leprosy. 28 And if the bright spot stay in his place, <i>and</i> spread not in the skin, but it <i>be</i> somewhat dark; it <i>is</i> a rising of the burning, and the priest shall pronounce him clean: for it <i>is</i> an inflammation of the burning. 29 If a man or woman have a plague upon the head or the beard; 30 Then the priest shall see the plague: and, behold, if it <i>be</i> in sight deeper than the skin; <i>and there be</i> in it a yellow thin hair; then the priest shall pronounce him unclean: it <i>is</i> a dry scall, <i>even</i> a leprosy upon the head or beard. 31 And if the priest look on the plague of the scall, and, behold, it <i>be</i> not in sight deeper than the skin, and <i>that there is</i> no black hair in it; then the priest shall shut up <i>him that hath</i> the plague of the scall seven days: 32 And in the seventh day the priest shall look on the plague: and, behold, <i>if</i> the scall spread not, and there be in it no yellow hair, and the scall <i>be</i> not in sight deeper than the skin; 33 He shall be shaven, but the scall shall he not shave; and the priest shall shut up <i>him that hath</i> the scall seven days more: 34 And in the seventh day the priest shall look on the scall: and, behold, <i>if</i> the scall be not spread in the skin, nor <i>be</i> in sight deeper than the skin; then the priest shall pronounce him clean: and he shall wash his clothes, and be clean. 35 But if the scall spread much in the skin after his cleansing; 36 Then the priest shall look on him: and, behold, if the scall be spread in the skin, the priest shall not seek for yellow hair; he <i>is</i> unclean. 37 But if the scall be in his sight at a stay, and <i>that</i> there is black hair grown up therein; the scall is healed, he <i>is</i> clean: and the priest shall pronounce him clean. </p>