6 lines
13 KiB
HTML
6 lines
13 KiB
HTML
<p>Daniel’s adversaries could have no advantage against him from any law now in being; they therefore contrive a new law, by which they hope to ensnare him, and in a matter in which they knew they should be sure of him; and such was his fidelity to his God that they gained their point. Here is,</p>
|
||
<p class="tab-1">I. Darius’s impious law. I call it <i>Darius’s</i>, because he gave the royal assent to it, and otherwise it would not have been of force; but it was not properly his: he contrived it not, and was perfectly wheedled to consent to it. The presidents and princes framed the edict, brought in the bill, and by their management it was agreed to by the convention of the states, who perhaps were met at this time upon some public occasion. It is pretended that this bill which they would have to pass into a law was the result of mature deliberation, that <i>all the presidents of the kingdom, the governors, princes, counsellors, and captains, had consulted together</i> about it, and that they not only agreed to it, but <i>advised it</i>, for <i>divers good causes and considerations</i>, that they had done what they could to <i>establish it for a firm decree</i>; nay, they intimate to the king that it was carried <i>nemine contradicente—unanimously: “All the presidents</i> are of this mind;” and yet we are sure that Daniel, the chief of the three presidents, did not agree to it, and have reason to think that many more of the princes excepted against it as absurd and unreasonable. Note, It is no new thing for that to be represented, and with great assurance too, as the sense of the nation, which is far from being so; and that which few approve of is sometimes confidently said to be that which all agree to. But, O the infelicity of kings, who, being under a necessity of seeing and hearing with other people’s eyes and ears, are often wretchedly imposed upon! These designing men, under colour of doing honour to the king, but really intending the ruin of his favourite, press him to pass this into a law, and make it a royal statute, that <i>whosoever shall ask a petition of any god or man for thirty days, save of the king, shall be</i> put to death after the most barbarous manner, shall be <i>cast into the den of lions</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Dan.6.7" href="/passage/?search=Dan.6.7">Dan. 6:7</a>. This is the bill they have been hatching, and they lay it before the king to be signed and passed into a law. Now, 1. There is nothing in it that has the least appearance of good, but that it magnifies the king, and makes him seem both very great and very kind to his subjects, which, they suggest, will be of good service to him now that he has newly come to his throne, and will confirm his interests. All men must be made to believe that the king is so rich, and withal so ready to all petitioners, that none in any want or distress need to apply either to God or man for relief, but to him only. And for thirty days together he will be ready to give audience to all that have any petition to present to him. It is indeed much for the honour of kings to be benefactors to their subjects and to have their ears open to their complaints and requests; but if they pretend to be their sole benefactors, and undertake to be to them instead of God, and challenge that respect from them which is due to God only, it is their disgrace, and not their honour. But, 2. There is a great deal in it that is apparently evil. It is bad enough to forbid asking a petition of any man. Must not a beggar ask an alms, or one neighbour beg a kindness of another? If the child want bread, must he not ask it of his parents, or be cast into the den of lions if he do? Nay, those that have business with the king, may they not petition those about him to introduce them? But it was much worse, and an impudent affront to all religion, to forbid asking a petition <i>of any god</i>. It is by prayer that we give glory to God, fetch in mercy from God; and so keep up our communion with God; and to interdict prayer for thirty days is for so long to rob God of all the tribute he has from man and to rob man of all the comfort he has in God. When the light of nature teaches us that the providence of God has the ordering and disposing of all our affairs does not the law of nature oblige us by prayer to acknowledge God and seek to him? Does not every man’s heart direct him, when he is in want or distress, to call upon God, and must this be made high treason? We could not live a day without God; and can men live thirty days without prayer? Will the king himself be tied up for so long from praying to God; or, if it be allowed him, will he undertake to do it for all his subjects? Did ever any nation thus slight their gods? But see what absurdities malice will drive men to. Rather than not bring Daniel into trouble for praying to his God, they will deny themselves and all their friends the satisfaction of praying to theirs. Had they proposed only to prohibit the Jews from praying to their God, Daniel would have been as effectually ensnared; but they knew the king would not pass such a law, and therefore made it thus general. And the king, puffed up with a fancy that this would set him up as a little god, was fond of the <i>feather in his cap</i> (for so it was, and not a <i>flower in his crown</i>) and <i>signed the writing and the decree</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="Dan.6.9" href="/passage/?search=Dan.6.9">Dan. 6:9</a>), which, being once done, according to the constitution of the united kingdom of the Medes and Persians, was not upon any pretence whatsoever to be altered or dispensed with, or the breach of it pardoned.</p>
|
||
<p class="tab-1">II. Daniel’s pious disobedience to this law, <a class="bibleref" title="Dan.6.10" href="/passage/?search=Dan.6.10">Dan. 6:10</a>. He did not retire into the country, nor abscond for some time, though he knew the law was levelled against him; but, because he knew it was so, therefore he stood his ground, knowing that he had now a fair opportunity of honouring God before men, and showing that he preferred his favour, and his duty to him, before life itself. <i>When Daniel knew that the writing was signed</i> he might have gone to the king, and expostulated with him about it; nay, he might have remonstrated against it, as grounded upon a misinformation that <i>all the presidents</i> had consented to it, whereas he that was chief of them had never been consulted about it; but <i>he went to his house</i>, and applied himself to his duty, cheerfully trusting God with the event. Now observe,</p>
|
||
<p class="tab-1">1. Daniel’s constant practice, which we were not informed of before this occasion, but which we have reason to think was the general practice of the pious Jews. (1.) He <i>prayed in his house</i>, sometimes alone and sometimes with his family about him, and made a solemn business of it. Cornelius was a man that <i>prayed in his house</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Acts.10.30" href="/passage/?search=Acts.10.30">Acts 10:30</a>. Note, Every house not only may be, but ought to be, a house of prayer; where we have a tent God must have an alter, and on it we must offer spiritual sacrifices. (2.) In every prayer he gave thanks. When we pray to God for the mercies we want we must praise him for those we have received. Thanksgiving must be a part of every prayer. (3.) In his prayer and thanksgiving he had an eye to God as his God, his in covenant, and set himself as in his presence. He did this <i>before his God</i>, and with a regard to him. (4.) When he prayed and gave thanks he <i>kneeled upon his knees</i>, which is the most proper gesture in prayer, and most expressive of humility, and reverence, and submission to God. Kneeling is a begging posture, and we come to God as beggars, beggars for our lives, whom it concerns to be importunate. (5.) He <i>opened the windows of his chamber</i>, that the sight of the visible heavens might affect his heart with an awe of that God who dwells above the heavens; but that was not all: he <i>opened them towards Jerusalem</i>, the holy city, though now in ruins, to signify the affection he had for its very stones and dust (<a class="bibleref" title="Ps.102.14" href="/passage/?search=Ps.102.14">Ps. 102:14</a>) and the remembrance he had of its concerns daily in his prayers. Thus, though he himself lived great in Babylon, yet he testified his concurrence with the meanest of his brethren the captives, in remembering Jerusalem and preferring it before his <i>chief joy</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Ps.137.5,Ps.137.6" href="/passage/?search=Ps.137.5,Ps.137.6"><span class="bibleref" title="Ps.137.5">Ps. 137:5</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Ps.137.6">6</span></a>. Jerusalem was the place which God had chosen to put his name there; and, when the temple was dedicated, Solomon’s prayer to God was that if his people should <i>in the land of their enemies</i> pray unto him with their eye towards the land which he gave them, and the city he had chosen, and the house which was built to his name, then he would <i>hear</i> and <i>maintain their cause</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="1Kgs.8.48,1Kgs.8.49" href="/passage/?search=1Kgs.8.48,1Kgs.8.49"><span class="bibleref" title="1Kgs.8.48">1 Kgs. 8:48</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="1Kgs.8.49">49</span></a>), to which prayer Daniel had reference in this circumstance of his devotions. (6.) He did this <i>three times a day</i>, three times every day according to the example of David (<a class="bibleref" title="Ps.55.17" href="/passage/?search=Ps.55.17">Ps. 55:17</a>), <i>Morning, evening, and at noon, I will pray</i>. It is good to have our hours of prayer, not to bind, but to remind conscience; and, if we think our bodies require refreshment by food thrice a day, can we think seldomer will serve our souls? This is surely as little as may be to answer the command of <i>praying always</i>. (7.) He did this so openly and avowedly that all who knew him knew it to be his practice; and he thus showed it, not because he was proud of it (in the place where he was there was no room for that temptation, for it was not reputation, but reproach, that attended it), but because he was not ashamed of it. Though Daniel was a great man, he did not think it below him to be thrice a day upon his knees before his Maker and to be his own chaplain; though he was an old man, he did not think himself past it; nor, though it had been his practice from his youth up, was he weary of this well doing. Though he was a man of business, vast business, for the service of the public, he did not think that would excuse him from the daily exercises of devotion. How inexcusable then are those who have but little to do in the world, and yet will not do thus much for God and their souls! Daniel was a man famous for prayer, and for success in it (<a class="bibleref" title="Ezek.14.14" href="/passage/?search=Ezek.14.14">Ezek. 14:14</a>), and he came to be so by thus making a conscience of prayer and making a business of it daily; and in thus doing God blessed him wonderfully.</p>
|
||
<p class="tab-1">2. Daniel’s constant adherence to this practice, even when it was made by the law a capital crime. When he knew that <i>the writing was signed</i> he continued to do <i>as he did aforetime</i>, and altered not one circumstance of the performance. Many a man, yea, and many a good man, would have thought it prudence to omit it for these thirty days, when he could not do it without hazard of his life; he might have prayed so much oftener when those days had expired and the danger was over, or he might have performed the duty at another time, and in another place, so secretly that it should not be possible for his enemies to discover it; and so he might both satisfy his conscience and keep up his communion with God, and yet avoid the law, and continue in his usefulness. But, if he had done so, it would have been thought, both by his friends and by his enemies, that he had thrown up the duty for this time, through cowardice and base fear, which would have tended very much to the dishonour of God and the discouragement of his friends. Others who moved in a lower sphere might well enough act with caution; but Daniel, who had so many eyes upon him, must act with courage; and the rather because he knew that the law, when it was made, was particularly levelled against him. Note, We must not omit duty for fear of suffering, so, nor so much as <i>seems to come short</i> of it. In trying times great stress is laid upon our <i>confessing Christ before men</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="Matt.10.32" href="/passage/?search=Matt.10.32">Matt. 10:32</a>), and we must take heed lest, under pretence of discretion, we be found guilty of cowardice in the cause of God. If we do not think that this example of Daniel obliges us to do likewise, yet I am sure it forbids us to censure those that do, for God owned him in it. By his constancy to his duty it now appears that he had never been used to admit any excuse for the omission of it; for, if ever any excuse would serve to put it by, this would have served now, (1.) That it was forbidden by the king his master, and in honour of the king too; but it is an undoubted maxim, in answer to that, We are to obey God rather than men. (2.) That it would be the loss of his life, but it is an undoubted maxim, in answer to that, Those who throw away their souls (as those certainly do that live without prayer) to save their lives make but a bad bargain for themselves; and though herein they make themselves, like the king of Tyre, <i>wiser than Daniel</i>, at their end they will be fools.</p>
|