2 lines
7.8 KiB
HTML
2 lines
7.8 KiB
HTML
<p>Here is 1. Proof made of Daniel’s praying to his God, notwithstanding the late edict to the contrary (<a class="bibleref" title="Dan.6.11" href="/passage/?search=Dan.6.11">Dan. 6:11</a>): <i>These men assembled</i>; the <i>came tumultuously together</i>, so the word is, the same that was used <a class="bibleref" title="Dan.6.6" href="/passage/?search=Dan.6.6">Dan. 6:6</a>; borrowed from <a class="bibleref" title="Ps.2.1" href="/passage/?search=Ps.2.1">Ps. 2:1</a>; <i>Why do the heathen rage</i>? They came together to visit Daniel, perhaps under pretence of business, at that time which they knew to be his usual hour of devotion; and, if they had not found him so engaged, they would have upbraided him with his faint-heartedness and distrust of his God, but (which they rather wished to do) they <i>found him on his knees praying</i> and <i>making supplication before his God. For his love they are his adversaries</i>; but, like his father David, he <i>gives himself unto prayer</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Ps.109.4" href="/passage/?search=Ps.109.4">Ps. 109:4</a>. 2. Complaint made of it to the king. When they had found occasion against Daniel concerning <i>the law of his God</i> they lost no time, but applied to the king (<a class="bibleref" title="Dan.6.12" href="/passage/?search=Dan.6.12">Dan. 6:12</a>), and having appealed to his whether there was not such a law made, and gained from him a recognition of it, and that it was so ratified that it might not be altered, they proceeded to accuse Daniel, <a class="bibleref" title="Dan.6.13" href="/passage/?search=Dan.6.13">Dan. 6:13</a>. They so describe him, in the information they give, as to exasperate the king and incense him the more against him: “He is <i>of the children of the captivity of Judah</i>; he is of Judah, that despicable people, and now a captive in a despicable state, that can call nothing his own but what he has by the king’s favour, and yet <i>he regards not thee, O king! nor the decree that thou hast signed</i>.” Note, It is no new thing for that which is done faithfully, in the conscience towards God, to be misrepresented as done obstinately and in contempt of the civil powers, that is, for the best saints to be reproached as the worst men. Daniel regarded God, and therefore prayed, and we have reason to think prayed for the king and his government, yet this is construed as not regarding the king. That excellent spirit which Daniel was endued with, and that established reputation which he had gained, could not protect him from these poisonous darts. They do not say, He makes his petition to his God, lest Darius should take notice of that to his praise, but only, <i>He makes his petition</i>, which is the thing the law forbids. 3. The great concern the king was in hereupon. He now perceived that, whatever they pretended, it was not to honour him, but in spite to Daniel, that they had proposed that law, and now he is <i>sorely displeased with himself</i> for gratifying them in it, <a class="bibleref" title="Dan.6.14" href="/passage/?search=Dan.6.14">Dan. 6:14</a>. Note, When men indulge a proud vain-glorious humour, and please themselves with that which feeds it, they know not what vexations they are preparing for themselves; their flatterers may prove their tormentors, and are but <i>spreading a net for their feet</i>. Now, the king <i>sets his heart to deliver Daniel</i>; both by argument and by authority he labours <i>till the going down of the sun</i> to <i>deliver him</i>, that is, to persuade his accusers not to insist upon his prosecution. Note, We often do that, through inconsideration, which afterwards we see cause a thousand times to wish undone again, which is a good reason why we should <i>ponder the path of our feet</i>, for then <i>all our ways will be established</i>. 4. The violence with which the prosecutors demanded judgment, <a class="bibleref" title="Dan.6.15" href="/passage/?search=Dan.6.15">Dan. 6:15</a>. We are not told what Daniel said; the king himself is his advocate, he needs not plead his own cause, but silently commits himself and it to him that judges righteously. But the prosecutors insist upon it that the law must have its course; it is a fundamental maxim in the constitution of the government of the Medes and Persians, which had now become the universal monarchy, that <i>no decree or statute which the king establishes may be changed</i>. The same we find <a class="bibleref" title="Esth.1.19,Esth.8.8" href="/passage/?search=Esth.1.19,Esth.8.8"><span class="bibleref" title="Esth.1.19">Est. 1:19</span>; <span class="bibleref" title="Esth.8.8">8:8</span></a>. The Chaldeans magnified the will of their king, by giving him a power to make and unmake laws at his pleasure, to slay and keep alive whom he would. The Persians magnified the wisdom of their king, by supposing that whatever law he solemnly ratified it was so well made that there could be no occasion to alter it, or dispense with it, as if any human foresight could, in framing a law, guard against all inconveniences. But, if this maxim be duly applied to Daniel’s case (as I am apt to think it is not, but perverted), while it honours the king’s legislative power it hampers his executive power, and incapacitates him to show that mercy which upholds the throne, and to pass acts of indemnity, which are the glories of a reign. Those who allow not the sovereign’s power to dispense with a disabling statute, yet never question his power to pardon an offence against a penal statute. But Darius is denied this power. See what need we have to pray for princes that God would give them wisdom, for they are often embarrassed with great difficulties, even the wisest and best are. 5. The executing of the law upon Daniel. The king himself, with the utmost reluctance, and against his conscience, signs the warrant for his execution; and Daniel, that venerable grave man, who carried such a mixture of majesty and sweetness in his countenance, who had so often looked great upon the bench, and at the council-board, and greater upon his knees, who had power with God and man, and had prevailed, is brought, purely for worshipping his God, as if he had been one of the vilest of malefactors, and <i>thrown into the den of lions</i>, to be devoured by them, <a class="bibleref" title="Dan.6.16" href="/passage/?search=Dan.6.16">Dan. 6:16</a>. One cannot think of it without the utmost compassion to the gracious sufferer and the utmost indignation at the malicious prosecutors. To make sure work, the stone <i>laid upon the mouth of the den</i> is <i>sealed</i>, and the king (an over-easy man) is persuaded to seal it <i>with his own signet</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="Dan.6.17" href="/passage/?search=Dan.6.17">Dan. 6:17</a>), that unhappy signet with which he had confirmed the law that Daniel falls by. But his lords cannot trust him, unless they add their signets too. Thus, when Christ was buried, his adversaries <i>sealed the stone</i> that was rolled to the door of his sepulchre. 6. The encouragement which Darius gave to Daniel to trust in God: <i>Thy God whom thou servest continually, he will deliver thee</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Dan.6.16" href="/passage/?search=Dan.6.16">Dan. 6:16</a>. Here (1.) He justifies Daniel from guilt, owning all his crime to be serving his God continually, and continuing to do so even when it was made a crime. (2.) He leaves it to God to free him from punishment, since he could not prevail to do it: <i>He will deliver thee</i>. He is sure that his God can deliver him, for he believes him to be an almighty God, and he has reason to think he will do it, having heard of his delivering Daniel’s companions in a like case from the fiery furnace, and concluding him to be always faithful to those who approve themselves faithful to him. Note, Those who serve God continually he will continually preserve, and will bear them out in his service.</p>
|