7 lines
7.1 KiB
HTML
7 lines
7.1 KiB
HTML
<p>Solomon observes (<a class="bibleref" title="Prov.28.2" href="/passage/?search=Prov.28.2">Prov. 28:2</a>) that <i>for the transgression of a land many were the princes thereof</i> (so it was here in Israel), <i>but by a man of understanding the state thereof shall be prolonged</i>—so it was with Judah at the same time under Asa. When men forsake God they are out of the way of rest and establishment. Zimri, and Tibni, and Omri, are here striving for the crown. Proud aspiring men ruin one another, and involve others in the ruin. These confusions end in the settlement of Omri; we must therefore take him along with us through this part of the story.</p>
|
||
<p class="tab-1">I. How he was chosen, as the Roman emperors often were, by the army in the field, now encamped before Gibbethon. Notice was soon brought thither that Zimri had slain their king (<a class="bibleref" title="1Kgs.16.16" href="/passage/?search=1Kgs.16.16">1 Kgs. 16:16</a>) and set up himself in Tirzah, the royal city, whereupon they chose Omri king in the camp, that they might without delay avenge the death of Elah upon Zimri. Though he was idle and intemperate, yet he was their king, and they would not tamely submit to his murderer, nor let the treason go unpunished. They did not attempt to avenge the death of Nadab upon Baasha, perhaps because the house of Baasha had ruled with more gentleness than the house of Jeroboam; but Zimri shall feel the resentments of the provoked army. The siege of Gibbethon is quitted (Philistines are sure to gain when Israelites quarrel) and Zimri is prosecuted.</p>
|
||
<p class="tab-1">II. How he conquered Zimri, who is said to have reigned seven days (<a class="bibleref" title="1Kgs.16.15" href="/passage/?search=1Kgs.16.15">1 Kgs. 16:15</a>), so long before Omri was proclaimed king and himself proclaimed traitor; but we may suppose it was a longer time before he died, for he continued long enough to show his inclination to the way of Jeroboam, and to make himself obnoxious to the justice of God by supporting his idolatry, <a class="bibleref" title="1Kgs.16.19" href="/passage/?search=1Kgs.16.19">1 Kgs. 16:19</a>. Tirzah was a beautiful city, but not fortified, so that Omri soon made himself master of it (<a class="bibleref" title="1Kgs.16.17" href="/passage/?search=1Kgs.16.17">1 Kgs. 16:17</a>), forced Zimri into the palace, which being unable to defend, and yet unwilling to surrender, he burnt, and himself in it, <a class="bibleref" title="1Kgs.16.18" href="/passage/?search=1Kgs.16.18">1 Kgs. 16:18</a>. Unwilling that his rival should ever enjoy that sumptuous palace, he burnt it; and fearing that if he fell into the hands of the army, either alive or dead, he should be ignominiously treated, he burnt himself in it. See what desperate practices men’s wickedness sometimes brings them to, and how it hurries them into their own ruin; see the disposition of incendiaries, who set palaces and kingdoms on fire, though they are themselves in danger of perishing in the flame.</p>
|
||
<p class="tab-1">III. How he struggled with Tibni, and at length got clear of him: <i>Half of the people followed this Tibni</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="1Kgs.16.21" href="/passage/?search=1Kgs.16.21">1 Kgs. 16:21</a>), probably those who were in Zimri’s interest, with whom others joined, who would not have a king chosen in the camp (lest he should rule by the sword and a standing army), but in a convention of the states. The contest between these two lasted some years, and, it is likely, cost a great deal of blood on both sides, for it was in the twenty-seventh year of Asa that Omri was first elected (<a class="bibleref" title="1Kgs.16.15" href="/passage/?search=1Kgs.16.15">1 Kgs. 16:15</a>) and thence the twelve years of his reign are to be dated; but it was not till the thirty-first year of Asa that he began to reign without a rival; then Tibni died, it is likely in battle, <i>and Omri reigned</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="1Kgs.16.22" href="/passage/?search=1Kgs.16.22">1 Kgs. 16:22</a>. Sir Walter Raleigh, in his History of the World (2.19.6), enquires here why it was that in all these confusions and revolutions of the kingdom of Israel they never thought of returning to the house of David, and uniting themselves again to Judah, <i>for then it was better with them than now</i>; and he thinks the reason was because the kings of Judah assumed a more absolute, arbitrary, and despotic power than the kings of Israel. It was the heaviness of the yoke that they complained of when they first revolted from the house of David, and the dread of that made them ever after averse to it, and attached to kings of their own, who ruled more by law and the rules of a limited monarchy.</p>
|
||
<p class="tab-1">IV. How he reigned when he was at length settled on the throne. 1. He made himself famous by building Samaria, which, ever after, was the royal city of the kings of Israel (the palace at Tirzah being burnt), and in process of time grew so considerable that it gave name to the middle part of Canaan (which lay between Galilee on the north and Judea on the south) and to the inhabitants of that country, who were called <i>Samaritans</i>. He bought the ground for <i>two talents of silver</i>, somewhat more than 700<i>l</i>. of our money, for a talent was 353<i>l</i>. 11<i>s</i>. 10 1/2<i>d</i>. Perhaps Shemer, who sold him the ground, let him have it considerably the cheaper upon condition that the city should be called after his name, for otherwise it would have borne the name of the purchaser; it was called <i>Samaria</i>, or <i>Shemeren</i> (as it is in the Hebrew), from Shemer, the former owner, <a class="bibleref" title="1Kgs.16.24" href="/passage/?search=1Kgs.16.24">1 Kgs. 16:24</a>. The kings of Israel changed their royal seats, Shechem first, then Tirzah, now Samaria; but the kings of Judah were constant to Jerusalem, the city of God. Those that cleave to the Lord fix, but those that leave him ever wander. 2. He made himself infamous by his wickedness; for <i>he did worse than all that were before him</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="1Kgs.16.25" href="/passage/?search=1Kgs.16.25">1 Kgs. 16:25</a>. Though he was brought to the throne with much difficulty, and Providence had remarkably favoured him in his advancement, yet he was more profane, or more superstitious, and a greater persecutor, than either of the houses of Jeroboam or Baasha. He went further than they had done in <i>establishing iniquity by a law</i>, and forcing his subjects to comply with him in it; for we read of the statutes of Omri, the keeping of which made <i>Israel a desolation</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Mic.6.16" href="/passage/?search=Mic.6.16">Mic. 6:16</a>. Jeroboam caused Israel to sin by temptation, example, and allurement; but Omri did it by compulsion.</p>
|
||
<p class="tab-1">V. How he ended his reign, <a class="bibleref" title="1Kgs.16.27" href="/passage/?search=1Kgs.16.27">1 Kgs. 16:27</a>. He was in some repute for the might which he showed. Many a bad man has been a stout man. He died in his bed, as did Jeroboam and Baasha themselves; but, like them, left it to his posterity to fill up the measure, and then pay off the scores, of his iniquity.</p>
|