boose_magoose/mh_parser
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
141f71db96
mh_parser/matthew_henry/MHC45014.HTM
boose_magoose 7e11f29810 init
2023-11-29 21:23:35 -05:00

1304 lines
69 KiB
HTML
Raw Blame History

<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Matthew Henry's Complete Commentary on the Whole Bible [Romans XIV].</TITLE>
<meta name="aesop" content="information">
<meta name="description" content=
"This site is for those friends and family members who may or may not know Our Lord Jesus Christ, and if not, they may come to know Our Lord through His Prophets."> <meta name="author" content="Brian Duncalfe">
<meta name="keywords" content=
"Prophecy, Rapture,hope,bible map,bible maps, God, tribulation,Second Coming,Christ,large print bible,commentary,complete">
</HEAD>
<body background="../sueback.jpg" bgproperties="fixed" >
<center><h1>Matthew Henry's Complete Commentary
on the Whole Bible</h1>
<h3><a href="http://www.biblesnet.com" target="_blank">Back to Biblesnet.com Home Page</a>
</h3>
</center>
<HR>
<TABLE WIDTH="100%">
<TR>
<TD ALIGN="LEFT" VALIGN="TOP">
[<A HREF="MHC00000.HTM">Table of Contents</A>]<BR>
[<A HREF="MHC45013.HTM">Previous</A>]
[<A HREF="MHC45015.HTM">Next</A>]<BR>
<TD ALIGN="RIGHT" VALIGN="TOP">
Matthew Henry<BR><I>Commentary on the Whole Bible</I> (1721)
</TD></TR></TABLE>
<HR>
<!-- (Begin Body) -->
<CENTER>
<BR><FONT SIZE=+3><B>R O M A N S.</B></FONT>
<BR>
<BR><FONT SIZE=+2>CHAP. XIV.</FONT>
<HR SIZE=1 WIDTH=50>
</CENTER>
<FONT SIZE=-1>
<P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
The apostle having, in the former chapter, directed our conduct one
towards another in civil things, and prescribed the sacred laws of
justice, peaceableness, and order, to be observed by us as members of
the commonwealth, comes in this and part of the following chapter in
like manner to direct our demeanour one towards another in sacred
things, which pertain more immediately to conscience and religion, and
which we observe as members of the church. Particularly, he gives rules
how to manage our different apprehensions about indifferent things, in
the management of which, it seems, there was something amiss among the
Roman Christians, to whom he wrote, which he here labours to redress.
But the rules are general, and of standing use in the church, for the
preservation of that Christian love which he had so earnestly pressed
in the foregoing chapter as the fulfilling of the law. It is certain
that nothing is more threatening, nor more often fatal, to Christian
societies, than the contentions and divisions of their members. By
these wounds the life and soul of religion expire. Now in this chapter
we are furnished with the sovereign balm of Gilead; the blessed apostle
prescribes like a wise physician. "Why then is not the hurt of the
daughter of my people recovered," but because his directions are not
followed? This chapter, rightly understood, made use of, and lived up
to, would set things to rights, and heal us all.</P>
</FONT>
<A NAME="Ro14_1"> </A>
<A NAME="Ro14_2"> </A>
<A NAME="Ro14_3"> </A>
<A NAME="Ro14_4"> </A>
<A NAME="Ro14_5"> </A>
<A NAME="Ro14_6"> </A>
<A NAME="Ro14_7"> </A>
<A NAME="Ro14_8"> </A>
<A NAME="Ro14_9"> </A>
<A NAME="Ro14_10"> </A>
<A NAME="Ro14_11"> </A>
<A NAME="Ro14_12"> </A>
<A NAME="Ro14_13"> </A>
<A NAME="Ro14_14"> </A>
<A NAME="Ro14_15"> </A>
<A NAME="Ro14_16"> </A>
<A NAME="Ro14_17"> </A>
<A NAME="Ro14_18"> </A>
<A NAME="Ro14_19"> </A>
<A NAME="Ro14_20"> </A>
<A NAME="Ro14_21"> </A>
<A NAME="Ro14_22"> </A>
<A NAME="Ro14_23"> </A>
<A NAME="Sec1"> </A>
<TABLE WIDTH="100%" BORDER=0>
<TR><TD><FONT SIZE=+1><I>Exhortations to Candour; The Dominion of Christ.</I></FONT></TD>
<TD ALIGN=RIGHT VALIGN=BOTTOM><FONT SIZE=-1>A.&nbsp;D.</FONT>&nbsp;58.</TD></TR>
<TR><TD COLSPAN=2><HR SIZE=1></TD></TR>
</TABLE>
<P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
<FONT SIZE=+1>1 Him that is weak in the faith receive ye, <I>but</I> not to
doubtful disputations.
&nbsp; 2 For one believeth that he may eat all things: another, who is
weak, eateth herbs.
&nbsp; 3 Let not him that eateth despise him that eateth not; and let
not him which eateth not judge him that eateth: for God hath
received him.
&nbsp; 4 Who art thou that judgest another man's servant? to his own
master he standeth or falleth. Yea, he shall be holden up: for
God is able to make him stand.
&nbsp; 5 One man esteemeth one day above another: another esteemeth
every day <I>alike.</I> Let every man be fully persuaded in his own
mind.
&nbsp; 6 He that regardeth the day, regardeth <I>it</I> unto the Lord; and
he that regardeth not the day, to the Lord he doth not regard
<I>it.</I> He that eateth, eateth to the Lord, for he giveth God
thanks; and he that eateth not, to the Lord he eateth not, and
giveth God thanks.
&nbsp; 7 For none of us liveth to himself, and no man dieth to
himself.
&nbsp; 8 For whether we live, we live unto the Lord; and whether we
die, we die unto the Lord: whether we live therefore, or die, we
are the Lord's.
&nbsp; 9 For to this end Christ both died, and rose, and revived, that
he might be Lord both of the dead and living.
&nbsp; 10 But why dost thou judge thy brother? or why dost thou set at
nought thy brother? for we shall all stand before the judgment
seat of Christ.
&nbsp; 11 For it is written, <I>As</I> I live, saith the Lord, every knee
shall bow to me, and every tongue shall confess to God.
&nbsp; 12 So then every one of us shall give account of himself to
God.
&nbsp; 13 Let us not therefore judge one another any more: but judge
this rather, that no man put a stumblingblock or an occasion to
fall in <I>his</I> brother's way.
&nbsp; 14 I know, and am persuaded by the Lord Jesus, that <I>there is</I>
nothing unclean of itself: but to him that esteemeth any thing to
be unclean, to him <I>it is</I> unclean.
&nbsp; 15 But if thy brother be grieved with <I>thy</I> meat, now walkest
thou not charitably. Destroy not him with thy meat, for whom
Christ died.
&nbsp; 16 Let not then your good be evil spoken of:
&nbsp; 17 For the kingdom of God is not meat and drink; but
righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost.
&nbsp; 18 For he that in these things serveth Christ <I>is</I> acceptable
to God, and approved of men.
&nbsp; 19 Let us therefore follow after the things which make for
peace, and things wherewith one may edify another.
&nbsp; 20 For meat destroy not the work of God. All things indeed
<I>are</I> pure; but <I>it is</I> evil for that man who eateth with
offence.
&nbsp; 21 <I>It is</I> good neither to eat flesh, nor to drink wine, nor
<I>any thing</I> whereby thy brother stumbleth, or is offended, or is
made weak.
&nbsp; 22 Hast thou faith? have <I>it</I> to thyself before God. Happy <I>is</I>
he that condemneth not himself in that thing which he alloweth.
&nbsp; 23 And he that doubteth is damned if he eat, because <I>he
eateth</I> not of faith: for whatsoever <I>is</I> not of faith is sin.
</FONT></P>
<P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
We have in this chapter,</P>
<P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
I. An account of the unhappy contention which had broken out in the
Christian church. Our Master had foretold that offences would come;
and, it seems, so they did, for want of that wisdom and love which
would have prevented discord, and kept up union among them.</P>
<P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
1. There was a difference among them about the distinction of meats and
days; these are the two things specified. There might be other similar
occasions of difference, while these made the most noise, and were most
taken notice of. The case was this: The members of the Christian church
at Rome were some of them originally Gentiles, and others of them Jews.
We find Jews at Rome believing,
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Ac+28:24">Acts xxviii. 24</A>.
Now those that had been Jews were trained up in the observance of the
ceremonial appointments touching meats and days. This, which had been
bred in the bone with them, could hardly be got out of the flesh, even
after they turned Christians; especially with some of them, who were
not easily weaned from what they had long been wedded to. They were not
well instructed touching the cancelling of the ceremonial law by the
death of Christ, and therefore retained the ceremonial institutions,
and practised accordingly; while other Christians that understood
themselves better, and knew their Christian liberty, made no such
difference.
(1.) Concerning meats
(<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Ro+14:2"><I>v.</I> 2</A>):
<I>One believeth that he may eat all things</I>--he is well satisfied
that the ceremonial distinction of meats into clean and unclean is no
longer in force, but that every creature of God is good, and nothing to
be refused; nothing <I>unclean of itself,</I>
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Ro+14:14"><I>v.</I> 14</A>.
This he was assured of, not only from the general tenour and scope of
the gospel, but particularly from the revelation which Peter, the
apostle of the circumcision (and therefore more immediately concerned
in it), had to this purport,
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Ac+10:15,28">Acts x. 15, 28</A>.
This the strong Christian is clear in, and practises accordingly,
eating what is set before him, and asking no question for conscience'
sake,
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=1Co+10:27">1 Cor. x. 27</A>.
On the other hand, <I>another, who is weak,</I> is dissatisfied in this
point, is not clear in his Christian liberty, but rather inclines to
think that the meats forbidden by the law remain still unclean; and
therefore, to keep at a distance from them, he will eat no flesh at
all, but <I>eateth herbs,</I> contenting himself with only the fruits
of the earth. See to what degrees of mortification and self-denial a
tender conscience will submit. None know but those that experience it
how great both the restraining and the constraining power of conscience
is.
(2.) Concerning days,
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Ro+14:5"><I>v.</I> 5</A>.
Those who thought themselves still under some kind of obligation to the
ceremonial law esteemed <I>one day above another</I>--kept up a respect
to the times of the passover, pentecost, new moons, and feasts of
tabernacles; thought those days better than other days, and solemnized
them accordingly with particular observances, binding themselves to
some religious rest and exercise on those days. Those who knew that all
these things were abolished and done away by Christ's coming esteemed
every day alike. We must understand it with an exception of the Lord's
day, which all Christians unanimously observed; but they made no
account, took no notice, of those antiquated festivals of the Jews.
Here the apostle speaks of the distinction of meats and days as a thing
indifferent, when it went no further than the opinion and practice of
some particular persons, who had been trained up all their days to such
observances, and therefore were the more excusable if they with
difficulty parted with them. But in the epistle to the Galatians, where
he deals with those that were originally Gentiles, but were influenced
by some judaizing teachers, not only to believe such a distinction and
to practise accordingly, but to lay a stress upon it as necessary to
salvation, and to make the observance of the Jewish festivals public
and congregational, here the case was altered, and it is charged upon
them as the frustrating of the design of the gospel, falling from
grace,
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Ga+4:9-11">Gal. iv. 9-11</A>.
The Romans did it out of weakness, the Galatians did it out of
wilfulness and wickedness; and therefore the apostle handles them thus
differently. This epistle is supposed to have been written some time
before that to the Galatians. The apostle seems willing to let the
ceremonial law wither by degrees, and to let it have an honourable
burial; now these weak Romans seem to be only following it weeping to
its grave, but those Galatians were raking it out of its ashes.</P>
<P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
2. It was not so much the difference itself that did the mischief as
the mismanagement of the difference, making it a bone of contention.
(1.) Those who were strong, and knew their Christian liberty, and made
use of it, despised the weak, who did not. Whereas they should have
pitied them, and helped them, and afforded them meek and friendly
instruction, they trampled upon them as silly, and humoursome, and
superstitious, for scrupling those things which they knew to be lawful:
so apt are those who have knowledge to be puffed up with it, and to
look disdainfully and scornfully upon their brethren.
(2.) Those who were weak, and durst not use their Christian liberty,
judged and censured the strong, who did, as if they were loose
Christians, carnal professors, that cared not what they did, but walked
at all adventures, and stuck at nothing. They judged them as breakers
of the law, contemners of God's ordinance, and the like. Such censures
as these discovered a great deal of rashness and uncharitableness, and
would doubtless tend much to the alienating of affection. Well, this
was the disease, and we see it remaining in the church to this day; the
like differences, in like manner mismanaged, are still the disturbers
of the church's peace. But,</P>
<P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
II. We have proper directions and suggestions laid down for allaying
this contention, and preventing the ill consequences of it. The
apostle, as a wise physician, prescribes proper remedies for the
disease, which are made up of rules and reasons. Such gentle methods
does he take, with such cords of a man does he draw them together; not
by excommunicating, suspending, and silencing either side, but by
persuading them both to a mutual forbearance: and as a faithful daysman
he lays his hand upon them both, reasoning the case with the strong
that they should not be so scornful, and with the weak that they should
not be so censorious. If the contending parties will but submit to this
fair arbitration, each abate of his rigour, and sacrifice their
differences to their graces, all will be well quickly. Let us observe
the rules he gives, some to the strong and some to the weak, and some
to both, for they are interwoven; and reduce the reasons to their
proper rules.</P>
<P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
1. Those who are weak must be <I>received, but not to doubtful
disputations,</I>
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Ro+14:1"><I>v.</I> 1</A>.
Take this for a general rule; spend your zeal in those things wherein
you and all the people of God are agreed, and do not dispute about
matters that are doubtful. <I>Receive him,</I>
<B><I>proslambavesthe</I></B>--<I>take him to you,</I> bid him welcome,
receive him with the greatest affection and tenderness; <I>porrigite
manum</I> (so the Syriac): <I>lend him your hand,</I> to help him, to
fetch him to you, to encourage him. Receive him into your company, and
converse, and communion, entertain him with readiness and
condescension, and treat him with all possible endearments. Receive
him: not to quarrel with him, and to argue about uncertain points that
are in controversy, which will but confound him, and fill his head with
empty notions, perplex him, and shake his faith. Let not your Christian
friendship and fellowship be disturbed with such vain janglings and
strifes of words.--<I>Not to judge his doubtful thoughts</I> (so the
margin), "not to pump out his weak sentiments concerning those things
which he is in doubt about, that you may censure and condemn him."
Receive him, not to expose him, but to instruct and strengthen him. See
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=1Co+1:10,Php+3:15,16">1 Cor. i. 10; Phil. iii. 15, 16</A>.</P>
<P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
2. Those who are strong must by no means despise the weak; nor those
who are weak judge the strong,
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Ro+14:3"><I>v.</I> 3</A>.
This is levelled directly against the fault of each party. It is seldom
that any such contention exists but there is a fault on both sides, and
both must mend. He argues against both these jointly: we must not
despise nor judge our brethren. Why so?</P>
<P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
(1.) Because God hath received them; and we reflect upon him if we
reject those whom he hath received. God never cast off any one that had
true grace, though he was but weak in it; never broke the bruised reed.
Strong believers and weak believers, those that eat and those that eat
not, if they be true believers, are accepted of God. It will be good
for us to put this question to ourselves, when we are tempted to behave
scornfully towards our brethren, to disdain and censure them: "Hast not
God owned them; and, if he has, dare I disown them?" "Nay, God doth not
only receive him, but <I>hold him up,</I>
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Ro+14:4"><I>v.</I> 4</A>.
You think that he who eateth will fall by his presumption, or that he
who eateth not will sink under the weight of his own fears and
scruples; but if they have true faith, and an eye to God, the one in
the intelligent use of his Christian liberty and the other in the
conscientious forbearance of it, they shall be held up--the one in his
integrity, and the other in his comfort. This hope is built upon the
power of God, for <I>God is able to make him stand;</I> and, being
able, no doubt he is willing to exert that power for the preservation
of those that are his own." In reference to spiritual difficulties and
dangers (our own and others), much of our hope and comfort are grounded
upon the divine power,
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=1Pe+1:5,Jude+1:24">1 Pet. i. 5; Jude 24</A>.</P>
<P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
(2.) Because they are servants to their own master
(<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Ro+14:4"><I>v.</I> 4</A>):
<I>Who art thou that judgest another man's servant?</I> We reckon it a
piece of ill manners to meddle with other people's servants, and to
find fault with them and censure them. Weak and strong Christians are
indeed our brethren, but they are not our servants. This rash judging
is reproved,
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Jam+3:1">Jam. iii. 1</A>,
under the notion of being many masters. We make ourselves our
brethren's masters, and do in effect usurp the throne of God, when we
take upon us thus to judge them, especially to judge their thoughts and
intentions, which are out of our view, to judge their persons and
state, concerning which it is hard to conclude by those few indications
which fall within our cognizance. God sees not as man sees; and he is
their master, and not we. In judging and censuring our brethren, we
meddle with that which does not belong to us: we have work enough to do
at home; and, if we must needs be judging, let us exercise our faculty
upon our own hearts and ways.--<I> To his own master he stands or
falls;</I> that is, his doom will be according to his master's
sentence, and not according to ours. How well for us is it that we are
not to stand nor fall by the judgment one of another, but by the
righteous and unerring judgment of God, which is according to truth!
"While thy brother's cause is before thy judgment, it is <I>coram non
judice--before one who is not the judge;</I> the court of heaven is the
proper court for trial, where, and where only, the sentence is
definitive and conclusive; and to this, if his heart be upright, he may
comfortably appeal from thy rash censure."</P>
<P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
(3.) Because both the one and the other, if they be true believers, and
are right in the main, have an eye to God, and do approve themselves to
God in what they do,
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Ro+14:6"><I>v.</I> 6</A>.
He <I>that regards the day</I>--that makes conscience of the observance
of the Jewish fasts and festivals, not imposing it upon others, nor
laying a stress upon it, but willing to be as he thinks on the surer
side, as thinking there is no harm in resting from worldly labours, and
worshipping God on those days--it is well. We have reason to think,
because in other things he conducts himself like a good Christian, that
in this also his eye is single, and that <I>he regardeth it unto the
Lord;</I> and God will accept of his honest intention, though he be
under a mistake about the observance of days; for the sincerity and
uprightness of the heart were never rejected for the weakness and
infirmity of the head: so good a master do we serve. On the other
hand, he <I>that regards not the day</I>--that does not make a
difference between one day and another, does not call one day holy and
another profane, one day lucky and another unlucky, but esteems every
day alike--he does not do it out of a spirit of opposition,
contradiction, or contempt of his brother. If he be a good Christian,
he does not, he dares not, do it from such a principle; and therefore
we charitably conclude that to the <I>Lord he does not regard it.</I>
he makes no such difference of days only because he knows God hath made
none; and therefore intends his honour in endeavouring to dedicate ever
day to him. So for the other instance: <I>He that eateth</I> whatever
is set before him, though it be blood, though it be swine's flesh, if
it be food convenient for him, he <I>eateth to the Lord.</I> He
understands the liberty that God has granted him, and uses it to the
glory of God, with an eye to his wisdom and goodness in enlarging our
allowance now under the gospel, and taking off the yoke of legal
restraints; and he <I>giveth God thanks</I> for the variety of food he
has, and the liberty he has to eat it, and that in those things his
conscience is not fettered. On the other hand, <I>he that eatest
not</I> those meats which were forbidden by the ceremonial law, <I>to
the Lord he eateth not.</I> It is for God's sake, because he is afraid
of offending God by eating that which he is sure was once prohibited;
and he <I>giveth God thanks too</I> that there is enough besides. If he
conscientiously deny himself that which he takes to be forbidden fruit,
yet he blesses God that of other trees in the garden he may freely eat.
Thus, while both have an eye to God in what they do, and approve
themselves to him in their integrity, why should either of them be
judged or despised? Observe, Whether we eat flesh, or eat herbs, it is
a thankful regard to God, the author and giver of all our mercies, that
sanctifies and sweetens it. Bishop Sanderson, in his 34th sermon, upon
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=1Ti+4:4">1 Tim. iv. 4</A>,
justly makes this observation: It appears by this that <I>saying
grace</I> (as we commonly call it, perhaps from
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=1Co+10:30">1 Cor. x. 30</A>)
before and after meat was the common known practice of the church,
among Christians of all sorts, weak and strong: an ancient,
commendable, apostolical, Christian practice, derived down from
Christ's example through all the ages of the church,
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Mt+14:19,15:36,Lu+9:16,Joh+6:11,Mt+26:26,27,Ac+27:35">Matt. xiv. 19; xv. 36;
Luke ix. 16; John vi. 11; Matt. xxvi. 26, 27; Acts xxvii. 35</A>.
Blessing the creatures in the name of God before we use them, and
blessing the name of God for them after, are both included; for
<B><I>eulogein</I></B> and <B><I>eucharistein</I></B> are used
promiscuously. To clear this argument against rash judging and
despising, he shows how essential it is to true Christianity to have a
regard to God and not to ourselves, which therefore, unless the
contrary do manifestly appear, we must presume concerning those that in
minor things differ from us. Observe his description of true
Christians, taken from their end and aim
(<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Ro+14:7,8"><I>v.</I> 7, 8</A>),
and the ground of it,
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Ro+14:9"><I>v.</I> 9</A>.</P>
<P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
[1.] Our end and aim: not self, but the Lord. As the particular end
specifies the action, so the general scope and tendency specify the
state. If we would know what way we walk in, we must enquire what end
we walk towards. <I>First,</I> Not to self. We have learned to deny
ourselves; this was our first lesson: <I>None of us liveth to
himself.</I> This is a thing in which all the people of God are one,
however they differ in other things; though some are weak and others
are strong, yet both agree in this, not to live to themselves. Not one
that hath given up his name to Christ is allowedly a self-seeker; it is
contrary to the foundation of true Christianity. We neither <I>live to
ourselves nor die to ourselves.</I> We are not our own masters, nor our
own proprietors--we are not at our own disposal. The business of our
lives is not to please ourselves, but to please God. The business of
our deaths, to which we are every day exposed and delivered, is not to
make ourselves talked of; we run not such hazards out of vain-glory,
while we are dying daily. When we come to die actually, neither is that
to ourselves; it is not barely that we would be unclothed, and eased of
the burden of the flesh, but it is to the Lord, that we may depart and
be with Christ, may be present with the Lord. <I>Secondly,</I> But
<I>to the Lord</I>
(<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Ro+14:8"><I>v.</I> 8</A>),
to the Lord Christ, to whom all power and judgment are committed, and
in whose name we are taught, as Christians, to do every thing we do
(<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Col+3:17">Col. iii. 17</A>),
with an eye to the will of Christ as our rule, to the glory of Christ
as our end,
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Php+1:21">Phil. i. 21</A>.
Christ is the gain we aim at, living and dying. We live to glorify him
in all the actions and affairs of life; we die, whether a natural or a
violent death, to glorify him, and to go to be glorified with him.
Christ is the centre, in which all the lines of life and death do meet.
This is true Christianity, which makes Christ all in all. So that,
<I>whether we live or die, we are the Lord's,</I> devoted to him,
depending on him, designed and designing for him. Though some
Christians are weak and others strong,--though of different sizes,
capacities, apprehensions, and practices, in minor things, yet they are
all the Lord's--all eying, and serving, and approving themselves to
Christ, and are accordingly owned and accepted of him. Is it for us
then to judge or despise them, as if we were their masters, and they
were to make it their business to please us, and to stand or fall by
our dooms?</P>
<P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
[2.] The ground of this,
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Ro+14:9"><I>v.</I> 9</A>.
It is grounded upon Christ's absolute sovereignty and dominion, which
were the fruit and end of his death and resurrection. <I>To this end he
both died, and rose, and revived</I> (he, having risen, entered upon a
heavenly life, the glory which he had before) <I>that he might be Lord
both of dead and living</I>--that he might be universal monarch, Lord
of all
(<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Ac+10:36">Acts x. 36</A>),
all the animate and inanimate creatures; for he is head over all things
to the church. He is Lord of those that are living to rule them, of
those that are dead to receive them and raise them up. This was that
<I>name above every name</I> which God gave him as the reward of his
humiliation,
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Php+2:8,9">Phil. ii. 8, 9</A>.
It was after he had died and risen that he said, <I>All power is given
unto me</I>
(<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Mt+28:18">Matt. xxviii. 18</A>),
and presently he exerts that power in issuing out commissions,
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Ro+14:19,20"><I>v.</I> 19, 20</A>.
Now if Christ paid so dearly for his dominion over souls and
consciences, and has such a just and undisputed right to exercise that
dominion, we must not so much as seem to invade it, nor intrench upon
it, by judging the consciences of our brethren, and arraigning them at
our bar. When we are ready to reproach and reflect upon the name and
memory of those that are dead and gone, and to pass a censure upon them
(which some the rather do, because such judgments of the dead are more
likely to pass uncontrolled and uncontradicted), we must consider that
Christ is Lord of the dead, as well as of the living. If they are dead,
they have already given up their account, and let that suffice. And
this leads to another reason against judging and despising,</P>
<P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
(4.) Because both the one and the other must shortly give an account,
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Ro+14:10-12"><I>v.</I> 10-12</A>.
A believing regard to the judgment of the great day would silence all
these rash judgings: <I>Why dost thou</I> that art weak <I>judge thy
brother</I> that is strong? And <I>why dost thou</I> that art strong
<I>set at nought thy brother</I> that is weak? Why is all this
clashing, and contradicting, and censuring, among Christians? <I>We
shall all stand before the judgment-seat of Christ,</I>
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=2Co+5:10">2 Cor. v. 10</A>.
Christ will be the judge, and he has both authority and ability to
determine men's eternal state according to their works, and before him
we shall stand as persons to be tried, and to give up an account,
expecting our final doom from him, which will be eternally conclusive.
To illustrate this
(<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Ro+14:11"><I>v.</I> 11</A>),
he quotes a passage out of the Old Testament, which speaks of Christ's
universal sovereignty and dominion, and that established with an oath:
<I>As I live</I> (saith the Lord), <I>every knee shall bow to me.</I>
It is quoted from
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Isa+45:23">Isa. xlv. 23</A>.
There it is, <I>I have sworn by myself;</I> here it is, <I>As I
live.</I> So that whenever God saith <I>As I live,</I> it is to be
interpreted as swearing by himself; for it is God's prerogative to have
life in himself: there is a further ratification of it there, <I>The
word is gone out of my mouth.</I> It is a prophecy, in general, of
Christ's dominion; and here very fully applied to the judgment of the
great day, which will be the highest and most illustrious exercise of
that dominion. Here is a proof of Christ's Godhead: he is the Lord and
he is God, equal with the Father. Divine honour is due to him, and must
be paid. It is paid to God through him as Mediator. God will judge the
world by him,
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Ac+17:31">Acts xvii. 31</A>.
The bowing of the knee to him, and the confession made with the tongue,
are but outward expressions of inward adoration and praise. <I>Every
knee</I> and <I>every tongue,</I> either freely or by force.</P>
<P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
[1.] All his friends do it freely, are made willing in the day of his
power. Grace is the soul's cheerful, entire, and avowed subjection to
Jesus Christ. <I>First,</I> Bowing to him--the understanding bowed to
his truths, the will to his laws, the whole man to his authority; and
this expressed by the bowing of the knee, the posture of adoration and
prayer. It is proclaimed before our Joseph, <I>Bow the knee,</I>
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Ge+41:43">Gen. xli. 43</A>.
Though bodily exercise alone profits little, yet, as it is guided by
inward fear and reverence, it is accepted. <I>Secondly,</I> Confessing
to him--acknowledging his glory, grace, and greatness--acknowledging
our own meanness and vileness, confessing our sins to him; so some
understand it.</P>
<P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
[2.] All his foes shall be constrained to do it, whether they will or
no. When he shall come in the clouds, and every eye shall see him,
then, and not till then, will all those promises which speak of his
victories over his enemies and their subjection to him have their full
and complete accomplishment; then his foes shall be his footstool, and
all his enemies shall lick the dust. Hence he concludes
(<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Ro+14:12"><I>v.</I> 12</A>),
<I>Every one of us shall give account of himself to God.</I> We must
not give account for others, nor they for us; but every one for
himself. We must give account how we have spent our time, how we have
improved our opportunities, what we have done and how we have done it.
And therefore, <I>First,</I> We have little to do to judge others, for
they are not accountable to us, nor are we accountable for them
(<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Ga+2:6">Gal. ii. 6</A>):
<I>Whatsoever they were, it maketh no matter to me, God accepteth no
man's person.</I> Whatever they are, and whatever they do, they must
give account to their own master, and not to us; if we can in any thing
be helpers of their joy, it is well; but we have not dominion over
their faith. And, <I>Secondly,</I> We have the more to do to judge
ourselves. We have an account of our own to make up, and that is enough
for us; let every <I>man prove his own work</I>
(<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Ga+6:4">Gal. vi. 4</A>),
state his own accounts, search his own heart and life; let this take up
his thoughts, and he that is strict in judging himself and abasing
himself will not be apt to judge and despise his brother. Let all these
differences be referred to the arbitration of Christ at the great
day.</P>
<P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
(5.) Because the stress of Christianity is not to be laid upon these
things, nor are they at all essential to religion, either on the one
side or on the other. This is his reason
(<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Ro+14:17,18"><I>v.</I> 17, 18</A>),
which is reducible to this branch of exhortation. Why should you spend
your zeal either for or against those things which are so minute and
inconsiderable in religion? Some make it a reason why, in case of
offence likely to be taken, we should refrain the use of our Christian
liberty; but it seems directed in general against that heat about those
things which he observed on both sides. <I>The kingdom of God is not
meat,</I> &c. Observe here,</P>
<P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
[1.] The nature of true Christianity, what it is: it is here called,
<I>The kingdom of God;</I> it is a religion intended to rule us, a
kingdom: it stands in a true and hearty subjection to God's power and
dominion. The gospel dispensation is in a special manner called <I>the
kingdom of God,</I> in distinction from the legal dispensation,
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Mt+3:2,4:17">Matt. iii. 2; iv. 17</A>.
<I>First,</I> It is <I>not meat and drink:</I> it does not consist
either in using or in abstaining from such and such meats and drinks.
Christianity gives no rule in that case, either in one way or another.
The Jewish religion consisted much in meats and drinks
(<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Heb+9:10">Heb. ix. 10</A>),
abstaining from some meats religiously
(<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Le+11:2">Lev. xi. 2</A>),
eating other meats religiously, as in several of the sacrifices, part
of which were to be eaten before the Lord: but all those appointments
are now abolished and are no more,
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Col+2:21,22">Col. ii. 21, 22</A>.
The matter is left at large. Every <I>creature of God is good,</I>
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=1Ti+4:4">1 Tim. iv. 4</A>.
So, as to other things, it is neither circumcision nor uncircumcision
(<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Ga+5:6,6:15,1Co+7:19">Gal. v. 6; vi. 15; 1 Cor. vii. 19</A>),
it is not being of this party and persuasion, of this or the other
opinion in minor things, that will recommend us to God. It will not be
asked at the great day, "Who ate flesh, and who ate herbs?" "Who kept
holy days, and who did not?" Nor will it be asked, "Who was conformist
and who was non-conformist?" But it will be asked, "Who feared God and
worked righteousness, and who did not?" Nothing more destructive to
true Christianity than placing it in modes, and forms, and
circumstantials, which eat out the essentials. <I>Secondly, It is
righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost.</I> These are some
of the essentials of Christianity, things in which all the people of
God are agreed, in the pursuit of which we must spend our zeal, and
which we must mind with an excelling care. Righteousness, peace, and
joy, are very comprehensive words; and each of them includes much, both
of the foundation and the superstructure of religion. Might I limit the
sense of them, it should be thus:--As to God, our great concern is
<I>righteousness</I>--to appear before him justified by the merit of
Christ's death, sanctified by the Spirit of his grace; for the
righteous Lord loveth righteousness. As to our brethren, it is
<I>peace</I>--to live in peace and love, and charity with them,
following peace with all men: Christ came into the world to be the
great peace-maker. As to ourselves, it is <I>joy in the Holy
Ghost</I>--that spiritual joy which is wrought by the blessed Spirit in
the hearts of believers, which respects God as their reconciled Father
and heaven as their expected home. Next to our compliance with God, the
life of religion consists in our complacency in him; to delight
ourselves always in the Lord. Surely we serve a good Master, who makes
peace and joy so essential to our religion. Then and then only we may
expect peace and joy in the Holy Ghost when the foundation is laid in
righteousness,
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Isa+32:17">Isa. xxxii. 17</A>.
<I>Thirdly,</I> It is in these things to <I>serve Christ</I>
(<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Ro+14:18"><I>v.</I> 18</A>),
to do all this out of respect to Christ himself as our Master, to his
will as our rule and to his glory as our end. That which puts an
acceptableness upon all our good duties is a regard to Christ in the
doing of them. We are to serve his interests and designs in the world,
which are in the first place to reconcile us one to another. What is
Christianity but the serving of Christ? And we may well afford to serve
him who for us and for our salvation took upon him the form of a
servant.</P>
<P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
[2.] The advantages of it. He that duly observeth these things,
<I>First,</I> Is acceptable to God. God is well pleased with such a
one, though he be not in every thing just of our length. He has the
love and favour of God; his person, his performances, are accepted of
God, and we need no more to make us happy. If God now accepts thy
works, thou mayest eat thy bread with joy. Those are most pleasing to
God that are best pleased with him; and they are those that abound most
in peace and joy in the Holy Ghost. <I>Secondly,</I> He is approved of
men--of all wise and good men, and the opinion of others is not to be
regarded. The persons and things which are acceptable to God should be
approved of us. Should not we be pleased with that which God is pleased
with? What is it to be sanctified, but to be of God's mind? Observe,
The approbation of men is not to be slighted; for we must provide
things honest in the sight of all men, and study those things that are
lovely and of good report: but the acceptance of God is to be desired
and aimed at in the first place, because, sooner or later, God will
bring all the world to be of his mind.</P>
<P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
3. Another rule here given is this, that in these doubtful things every
one not only may, but must, walk according to the light that God hath
given him. This is laid down
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Ro+14:5"><I>v.</I> 5</A>,
<I>Let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind;</I> that is,
"Practise according to your own judgment in these things, and leave
others to do so too. Do not censure the practice of others; let them
enjoy their own opinion; if they be persuaded in their own mind that
they ought to do so and so, do not condemn them, but, if your sober
sentiments be otherwise, do not make their practice a rule to you, any
more than you must prescribe yours as a rule to them. Take heed of
acting contrary to the dictates of a doubting conscience. First be
persuaded that what you do is lawful, before you venture to do it." In
doubtful things, it is good keeping on the sure side of the hedge. If a
weak Christian doubts whether it be lawful to eat flesh, while he
remains under that doubt he had best forbear, till he be fully
persuaded in his own mind. We must not pin our faith upon any one's
sleeve, nor make the practice of others our rule; but follow the
dictates of our own understanding. To this purport he argues,
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Ro+14:14,23"><I>v.</I> 14 and 23</A>,
which two verses explain this, and give us a rule not to act against
the dictates,</P>
<P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
(1.) Of a mistaken conscience,
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Ro+14:14"><I>v.</I> 14</A>.
If a thing be indifferent, so that it is not in itself a sin not to do
it, if we really think it a sin to do it it is to us a sin, though not
to others, because we act against our consciences, though mistaken and
misinformed. He specifies the case in hand, concerning the difference
of meats. Observe,</P>
<P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
[1.] His own clearness in this matter. "<I>I know and am
persuaded</I>--I am fully persuaded, I am acquainted with my Christian
liberty, and am satisfied in it, without any doubt or scruple, that
there <I>is nothing unclean of itself,</I> that is, no kind of meat
that lies under any ceremonial uncleanness, nor is forbidden to be
eaten, if it be food proper for human bodies." Several kinds of meat
were forbidden to the Jews, that in that, as in other things, they
might be a peculiar and separate people,
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Le+11:44,De+14:2,3">Lev. xi. 44; Deut. xiv. 2, 3</A>.
Sin had brought a curse upon the whole creation: <I>Cursed is the
ground for thy sake;</I> the use of the creatures and dominion over
them were forfeited, so that to man they were all unclean
(<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Tit+1:15">Tit. i. 15</A>),
in token of which God in the ceremonial law prohibited the use of some,
to show what he might have done concerning all; but now that Christ has
removed the curse the matter is set at large again, and that
prohibition is taken away. Therefore Paul says that he was persuaded by
the Lord Jesus, not only as the author of that persuasion, but as the
ground of it; it was built upon the efficacy of Christ's death, which
removed the curse, took off the forfeiture, and restored our right to
the creature in general, and consequently put a period to that
particular distinguishing prohibition. So that now there is nothing
unclean of itself, every creature of God is good; nothing
<I>common:</I> so the margin, <B><I>ouden koinon;</I></B> nothing which
is common to others to eat, from the use of which the professors of
religion are restrained: nothing profane; in this sense the Jews used
the word <I>common.</I> It is explained by the word
<B><I>akatharton,</I></B>
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Ac+10:14">Acts x. 14</A>,
nothing <I>common</I> or <I>unclean.</I> It was not only from the
revelation made to Peter in this matter, but from the tenour and
tendency of the whole gospel, and from the manifest design of Christ's
death in general, that Paul learned to count nothing common or unclean.
This was Paul's own clearness, and he practised accordingly.</P>
<P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
[2.] But here is a caution he gives to those who had not that clearness
in this matter which he had: <I>To him that esteemeth any thing to be
unclean,</I> though it be his error, yet <I>to him it is unclean.</I>
This particular case, thus determined, gives a general rule, That he
who does a thing which he verily believes to be unlawful, however the
thing be in itself, to him it is a sin. This arises from that
unchangeable law of our creation, which is, that our wills, in all
their choices, motions, and directions, should follow the dictates of
our understandings. This is the order of nature, which order is broken
if the understanding (though misguided) tell us that such a thing is a
sin, and yet we will do it. This is a <I>will</I> to do evil; for, if
it appears to us to be sin, there is the same pravity and corruption of
the will in the doing of it as if really it were a sin; and therefore
we ought not to do it. Not that it is in the power of any man's
conscience to alter the nature of the action in itself, but only as to
himself. It must be understood likewise with this proviso, though men's
judgments and opinions may make that which is good in itself to become
evil to them, yet they cannot make that which is evil in itself to
become good, either in itself or to them. If a man were verily
persuaded (it is Dr. Sanderson's instance, sermon on
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Ro+14:23"><I>ch.</I> xiv. 23</A>)
that it were evil to ask his father's blessing, that mispersuasion
would make it become evil to him: but, if he should be as verily
persuaded that it were good to curse his father, this would not make it
become good. The Pharisees taught people to plead conscience, when they
made <I>corban</I> an excuse for denying relief to their parents,
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Mt+15:5,6">Matt. xv. 5, 6</A>.
But this would not serve any more than Paul's erroneous conscience
would justify his rage against Christianity
(<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Ac+26:9">Acts xxvi. 9</A>),
or theirs,
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Joh+16:2">John xvi. 2</A>.</P>
<P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
(2.) Nor must we act against the dictates of a doubting conscience. In
those indifferent things which we are sure it is no sin not to do, and
yet are not clear that it is lawful to do them, we must not do them
while we continue under those doubts; for he <I>that doubteth is damned
if he eat</I>
(<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Ro+14:23"><I>v.</I> 23</A>),
that is, it turns into sin to him; he is <I>damned,</I>
<B><I>katakekritai</I></B>--<I>he is condemned</I> of his own
conscience, because he <I>eateth not of faith,</I> because he does that
which he is not fully persuaded he may lawfully do. He is not clear
that it is lawful for him to eat swine's flesh (suppose), and yet is
drawn, notwithstanding his doubts, to eat it, because he sees others do
it, because he would gratify his appetite with it, or because he would
not be reproached for his singularity. Here his own heart cannot but
condemn him as a transgressor. Our rule is, to walk as far as we have
attained, not further,
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Php+3:15,16">Phil. iii. 15, 16</A>.--
<I>For whatsoever is not of faith is sin.</I> Taking it in general, it
is the same with that of the apostle
(<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Heb+11:6">Heb. xi. 6</A>),
<I>Without faith it is impossible to please God.</I> Whatever we do in
religion, it will not turn to any good account, except we do it from a
principle of faith, with a believing regard to the will of Christ as
our rule, to the glory of Christ as our end, and to the righteousness
of Christ as our plea. Here it seems to be taken more strictly;
whatever is not of faith (that is, whatever is done while we are not
clearly persuaded of the lawfulness of it), is a sin against
conscience. He that will venture to do that which his own conscience
suggests to him to be unlawful, when it is not so in itself, will by a
like temptation be brought to do that which his conscience tells him is
unlawful when it is really so. The spirit of a man is the candle of the
Lord, and it is a dangerous thing to debauch and put a force upon
conscience, though it be under a mistake. This seems to be the meaning
of that aphorism, which sounds somewhat darkly
(<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Ro+14:22"><I>v.</I> 22</A>),
<I>Happy is he that condemns not himself in that thing which he
allows.</I> Many a one allows himself in practice to do that which yet
in his judgment and conscience he condemns himself for--allows it for
the sake of the pleasure, profit, or credit of it--allows it in
conformity to the custom; and yet whilst he does it, and pleas for it,
his own heart gives him the lie, and his conscience condemns him for
it. Now, happy is the man who so orders his conversation as not in any
action to expose himself to the challenges and reproaches of his own
conscience--that does not make his own heart his adversary, as he must
needs do who does that which he is not clear he may lawfully do. He is
happy that has peace and quietness within, for the testimony of
conscience will be a special cordial in troublesome times. Though men
condemn us, it is well enough if our own hearts condemn us not,
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=1Jo+3:21">1 John iii. 21</A>.</P>
<P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
4. Another rule here prescribed is to those who are clear in these
matters, and know their Christian liberty, yet to take heed of using it
so as to give offence to a weak brother. This is laid down
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Ro+14:13"><I>v.</I> 13</A>,
<I>Let us not judge one another any more.</I> "Let it suffice that you
have hitherto continued in this uncharitable practice, and do so no
more." The better to insinuate the exhortation, he puts himself in; Let
us not; as if he had said, "It is what I have resolved against,
therefore do you leave it: but <I>judge this rather,</I> instead of
censuring the practice of others, let us look to our own, that no
<I>man put a stumbling-block, or an occasion to fall, in his brother's
way,</I>"--<B><I>proskomma, e skandalon.</I></B> We must take heed of
saying or doing any thing which may occasion our brother to stumble or
fall; the one signifies a less, the other a greater degree of mischief
and offence--that which may be an occasion,</P>
<P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
(1.) Of grief to our brother, "One that is weak, and thinks it unlawful
to eat such and such meats, will be greatly troubled to see thee eat
them, out of a concern for the honour of the law which he thinks
forbids them, and for the good of thy soul which he thinks is wronged
by them, especially when thou dost it wilfully and with a seeming
presumption, and not with that tenderness and that care to give
satisfaction to thy weak brother which would become thee." Christians
should take heed of grieving one another, and of saddening the hearts
of Christ's little ones. See
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Mt+18:6,10">Matt. xviii. 6, 10</A>.</P>
<P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
(2.) Of guilt to our brother. The former is a <I>stumbling-block,</I>
that gives our brother a great shake, and is a hindrance and
discouragement to him; but this is an <I>occasion to fall.</I> "If thy
weak brother, purely by thy example and influence, without any
satisfaction received concerning his Christian liberty, be drawn to act
against his conscience and to walk contrary to the light he has, and so
to contract guilt upon his soul, though the thing were lawful to thee,
yet not being so to him (he having not yet <I>thereto attained</I>),
thou art to be blamed for giving the occasion." See this case
explained,
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=1Co+8:9-11">1 Cor. viii. 9-11</A>.
To the same purport
(<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Ro+14:21"><I>v.</I> 21</A>)
he recommends it to our care not to give offence to any one by the use
of lawful things: <I>It is good neither to eat flesh nor to drink
wine;</I> these are things lawful indeed and comfortable, but not
necessary to the support of human life, and therefore we may, and must,
deny ourselves in them, rather than give offence. <I>It is
good</I>--pleasing to God, profitable to our brother, and no harm to
ourselves. Daniel and his fellows were in better liking with pulse and
water than those were who ate the portion of the king's meat. It is a
generous piece of self-denial, for which we have Paul's example
(<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=1Co+8:13">1 Cor. viii. 13</A>),
<I>If meat make my brother to offend;</I> he does not say, <I>I will
eat no meat,</I> that is to destroy himself; but <I>I will eat no
flesh,</I> that is to deny himself, <I>while the world stands.</I> This
is to be extended to all such indifferent things whereby thy brother
stumbleth, or is offended, is involved either in sin or in trouble: or
<I>is made weak</I>--his graces weakened, his comforts weakened, his
resolutions weakened. <I>Is made weak,</I> that is, takes occasion to
show his weakness by his censures and scruples. We must not weaken
those that are weak; that is to quench the smoking flax and to break
the bruised reed. Observe the motives to enforce this caution.</P>
<P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
[1.] Consider the royal law of Christian love and charity, which is
hereby broken
(<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Ro+14:15"><I>v.</I> 15</A>):
<I>If thy brother be grieved with thy meat</I>--be troubled to see thee
eat those things which the law of Moses did forbid, which yet thou
mayest lawfully do; possibly thou art ready to say, "Now he talks
foolishly and weakly, and it is no great matter what he says." We are
apt, in such a case, to lay all the blame on that side. But the reproof
is here given to the stronger and more knowing Christian: <I>Now
walkest thou not charitably.</I> Thus the apostle takes part with the
weakest, and condemns the defect in love on the one side more than the
defect in knowledge on the other side; agreeably to his principles
elsewhere, that the way of love is the <I>more excellent way,</I>
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=1Co+12:31">1 Cor. xii. 31</A>.
Knowledge puffeth up, but charity edifieth,
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=1Co+8:1-3">1 Cor. viii. 1-3</A>.
<I>Now walkest thou not charitably.</I> Charity to the souls of our
brethren is the best charity. True love would make us tender of their
peace and purity, and beget a regard to their consciences as well as to
our own. Christ deals gently with those that have true grace, though
they are weak in it.</P>
<P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
[2.] Consider the design of Christ's death: <I>Destroy not him with thy
meat for whom Christ died,</I>
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Ro+14:15"><I>v.</I> 15</A>.
<I>First,</I> Drawing a soul to sin threatens the destruction of that
soul. By shaking his faith, provoking his passion, and tempting him to
act against the light of his own conscience, thou dost, as much as in
thee lies, destroy him, giving him an occasion to return to Judaism.
<B><I>Me apollye.</I></B> It denotes an utter destruction. The
beginning of sin is as the letting forth of water; we are not sure that
it will stop any where on this side of eternal destruction.
<I>Secondly,</I> The consideration of the love of Christ in dying for
souls should make us very tender of the happiness and salvation of
souls, and careful not to do any thing which may obstruct and hinder
them. Did Christ quit a life for souls, such a life, and shall not we
quit a morsel of meat for them? Shall we despise those whom Christ
valued at so high a rate? Did he think it worth while to deny himself
so much for them as to die for them, and shall not we think it worth
while to deny ourselves so little for them as abstaining from flesh
comes to?--<I>with thy meat.</I> Thou pleadest that it is thy own meat,
and thou mayest do what thou wilt with it; but remember that, though
the meat is thine, the brother offended by it is Christ's, and a part
of his purchase. While thou destroyest thy brother thou art helping
forward the devil's design, for he is the great destroyer; and, as much
as in thee lies, thou art crossing the design of Christ, for he is the
great Saviour, and dost not only offend thy brother, but offend Christ;
for the work of salvation is that which his heart is upon. But are any
destroyed for whom Christ died? If we understand it of the sufficiency
and general intendment of Christ's death, which was to save all upon
gospel terms, no doubt but multitudes are. If of the particular
determination of the efficacy of his death to the elect, then, though
none that were given to Christ shall perish
(<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Joh+6:39">John vi. 39</A>),
yet thou mayest, as much as is in thy power, destroy such. No thanks to
thee if they be not destroyed; by doing that which has a tendency to
it, thou dost manifest a great opposition to Christ. Nay, and thou
mayest utterly destroy some whose profession may be so justifiable that
thou art bound to believe, in a judgment of charity, that Christ died
for them. Compare this with
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=1Co+8:10,11">1 Cor. viii. 10, 11</A>.</P>
<P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
[3.] Consider the work of God
(<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Ro+14:20"><I>v.</I> 20</A>):
"<I>For meat destroy not the work of God</I>--the work of grace,
particularly the work of faith in thy brother's soul." The works of
peace and comfort are destroyed by such an offence given; take heed of
it therefore; do not undo that which God hath done. You should work
together with God, do not countermine his work. <I>First,</I> The work
of grace and peace is the work of God; it is wrought by him, it is
wrought for him; it is a good work of his beginning,
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Php+1:6">Phil. i. 6</A>.
Observe, The same for whom Christ died
(<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Ro+14:15"><I>v.</I> 15</A>)
are here called the work of God; besides the work that is wrought for
us there is a work to be wrought in us, in order to our salvation.
Every saint is God's workmanship, his husbandry, his building,
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Eph+2:10,1Co+3:9">Eph. ii. 10; 1 Cor. iii. 9</A>.
<I>Secondly,</I> We must be very careful to do nothing which tends to
the destruction of this work, either in ourselves or others. We must
deny ourselves in our appetites, inclinations, and in the use of
Christian liberty, rather than obstruct and prejudice our own or
others' grace and peace. Many do for meat and drink destroy the work of
God in themselves (nothing more destructive to eh soul than pampering
and pleasing the flesh, and fulfilling the lusts of it), so likewise in
others, by wilful offence given. Think what thou destroyest--<I>the
work of God,</I> whose work is honourable and glorious; think for what
thou destroyest it--<I>for meat,</I> which was but for the belly, and
the belly for it.</P>
<P> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
[4.] Consider the evil of giving offence, and what an abuse it is of
our Christian liberty. He grants that <I>all things indeed are
pure.</I> We may lawfully eat flesh, even those meats which were
prohibited by the ceremonial law; but, if we abuse this liberty, it
turns into sin to us: <I>It is evil to him that eats with offence.</I>
Lawful things may be done unlawfully.--<I>Eats with offence,</I> either
carelessly or designedly giving offence to his brethren. It is
observable that the apostle directs his reproof most against those who
gave the offence; not as if those were not to be blamed who causelessly
and weakly took the offence from their ignorance of Christian liberty,
and the want of that charity which is not easily provoked and which
thinketh no evil (he several times tacitly reflects upon them), but he
directs his speech to the strong, because they were better able to bear
the reproof, and to begin the reformation. For the further pressing of
this rule, we may here observe two directions which have relation to
it:--<I>First, Let not then your good be evil spoken of</I>
(<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Ro+14:16"><I>v.</I> 16</A>)--
take heed of doing any thing which may give occasion to others to speak
evil, either of the Christian religion in general, or of your Christian
liberty in particular. The gospel is your good; the liberties and
franchises, the privileges and immunities, granted by it, are your
good; your knowledge and strength of grace to discern and use your
liberty in things disputed are your good, a good which the weak brother
hath not. Now let not this be evil spoken of. It is true we cannot
hinder loose and ungoverned tongues from speaking evil of us, and of
the best things we have; but we must not (if we can help it) give them
any occasion to do it. Let not the reproach arise from any default of
ours; as
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=1Ti+4:12">1 Tim. iv. 12</A>,
<I>Let no man despise thee,</I> that is, do not make thyself
despicable. So here, Do not use your knowledge and strength in such a
manner as to give occasion to people to call it presumption and loose
walking, and disobedience to God's law. We must deny ourselves in many
cases for the preservation of our credit and reputation, forbearing to
do that which we rightly know we may lawfully do, when our doing it may
be a prejudice to our good name; as, when it is suspicious and has the
appearance of evil, or when it becomes scandalous among good people, or
has any way a brand upon it. In such a case we must rather cross
ourselves than shame ourselves. Though it be but a little folly, it may
be like a dead fly, very prejudicial to one that is in reputation for
wisdom and honour,
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Ec+10:1">Eccl. x. 1</A>.
We may apply it more generally. We should manage all our good duties in
such a manner that they may not be evil spoken of. That which for the
matter of it is good and unexceptionable may sometimes, by
mismanagement, be rendered liable to a great deal of censure and
reproach. Good praying, preaching, and discourse, may often, for want
of prudence in ordering the time, the expression, and other
circumstances to edification, be evil spoken of. It is indeed their
sin who do speak evil of that which is good for the sake of any such
circumstantial errors, but it is our folly if we give any occasion to
do so. As we tender the reputation of the good we profess and practise,
let us so order it that it may not be evil spoken of. <I>Secondly, Hast
thou faith? Have it to thyself before God,</I>
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Ro+14:22"><I>v.</I> 22</A>.
It is not meant of justifying faith (that must not be hid, but
manifested by our works), but of a knowledge and persuasion of our
Christian liberty in things disputed. "Hast thou clearness in such a
particular? Art thou satisfied that thou mayest eat all meats, and
observe all days (except the Lord's day) alike? <I>Have it to
thyself,</I> that is, enjoy the comfort of it in thy own bosom, and do
not trouble others by the imprudent use of it, when it might give
offence, and cause thy weak brother to stumble and fall." In these
indifferent things, though we must never contradict our persuasion, yet
we may sometimes conceal it, when the avowing of it will do more hurt
than good. <I>Have it to thyself</I>--a rule to thyself (not to be
imposed upon others, or made a rule to them), or a rejoicing to
thyself. Clearness in doubtful matters contributes very much to our
comfortable walking, as it frees us from those scruples, jealousies,
and suspicions, which those who have not such clearness are entangled
in endlessly. Compare
<A HREF="http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?version=KJV&passage=Ga+6:4">Gal. vi. 4</A>,
<I>Let every man prove his own work,</I> that is, bring it to the
touchstone of the word and try it by that so exactly as to be well
satisfied in what he does; and then he <I>shall have rejoicing in
himself alone, and not in another.</I> Paul had faith in these things:
<I>I am persuaded that there is nothing unclean of itself;</I> but he
had it to himself, so as not to use his liberty to the offence of
others. How happy were it for the church if those that have a clearness
in disputable things would be satisfied to have it to themselves before
God, and not impose those things upon others, and make them terms of
communions, than which nothing is more opposite to Christian liberty,
nor more destructive both to the peace of churches and the peace of
consciences. That healing method is not the less excellent for being
common: in things necessary let there be unity, things unnecessary let
there be liberty, and in both let there be charity, then all will be
well quickly.--<I>Have it to thyself before God.</I> The end of such
knowledge is that, being satisfied in our liberty, we may have a
conscience void of offence towards God, and let that content us. That
is the true comfort which we have before God. Those are right indeed
that are so in God's sight.</P>
<!-- (End Body) -->
<HR>
<TABLE WIDTH="100%">
<TR>
<TD ALIGN="LEFT" VALIGN="TOP">
[<A HREF="MHC00000.HTM">Table of Contents</A>]<BR>
[<A HREF="MHC45013.HTM">Previous</A>]
[<A HREF="MHC45015.HTM">Next</A>]<BR>
<TD ALIGN="RIGHT" VALIGN="TOP">
Matthew Henry<BR><I>Commentary on the Whole Bible</I> (1721)
</TABLE>
<HR>
<TABLE WIDTH="100%">
<TR>
<TD ALIGN="CENTER" VALIGN="BOTTOM">
<!--Matthew_Henry's_Commentary_on_the_Whole_Bible:_Romans_XIV.--><a href="http://www.biblesnet.com" target="_blank"><b>Back to Bibles Net . Com - Online Christian Library </b></a><br>
<a href="http://biblesnet.com/download.html" target="_blank"><br>
<b>Matthew Henry's Complete Commentary - Free Download</b></a><br>
<br>
<A HREF="http://biblesnet.com/contactus.html" target="_blank"><strong>Contact Us </strong></A><br>
</TD></TR></TABLE>
<HR>
</BODY>
</HTML>
Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink