mh_parser/vol_split/62 - 1John/0 - Introduction.xml
2023-12-17 21:11:28 -05:00

75 lines
5.4 KiB
XML
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters

This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

<div2 id="iJo.i" n="i" next="iJo.ii" prev="iJo" progress="89.38%" title="Introduction">
<div class="Center" id="iJo.i-p0.1"><h2 id="iJo.i-p0.2">First John</h2>
<p id="iJo.i-p1">Completed by <span class="smallcaps" id="iJo.i-p1.1">John Reynolds, of
Shrewsbury</span>.</p>
</div>
<hr/>
<pb id="iJo.i-Page_1059" n="1059"/>
<div class="Center" id="iJo.i-p1.3">
<p id="iJo.i-p2"><b>AN</b></p>
<h3 id="iJo.i-p2.1">EXPOSITION,</h3>
<h4 id="iJo.i-p2.2">W I T H   P R A C T I C A L   O B S E
R V A T I O N S,</h4>
<h5 id="iJo.i-p2.3">OF THE FIRST EPISTLE GENERAL OF</h5>
<h2 id="iJo.i-p2.4">J O H N.</h2>
<hr style="width:2in"/>
</div>
<p class="indent" id="iJo.i-p3"><span class="smallcaps" id="iJo.i-p3.1">Though</span> the
continued tradition of the church attests that this epistle came
from John the apostle, yet we may observe some other evidence that
will confirm (or with some perhaps even outweigh) the certainty of
that tradition. It should seem that the penman was one of the
apostolical college by the sensible palpable assurance he had of
the truth of the Mediator's person in his human nature: <i>That
which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we
have looked upon, and our hands have handled, of the Word of
life,</i> <scripRef id="iJo.i-p3.2" osisRef="Bible:1John.1.1" parsed="|1John|1|1|0|0" passage="1Jo 1:1"><i>v.</i> 1</scripRef>. Here
he takes notice of the evidence the Lord gave to Thomas of his
resurrection, by calling him to feel the prints of the nails and of
the spear, which is recorded by John. And he must have been one of
the disciples present when the Lord came on the same day in which
he arose from the dead, and showed them his hands and his side,
<scripRef id="iJo.i-p3.3" osisRef="Bible:John.20.20" parsed="|John|20|20|0|0" passage="Joh 20:20">John xx. 20</scripRef>. But, that we
may be assured which apostle this was, there is scarcely a critic
or competent judge of diction, or style of argument and spirit, but
will adjudge this epistle to the writer of that gospel that bears
the name of the apostle John. They wonderfully agree in the titles
and characters of the Redeemer: <i>The Word, the Life, the Light;
his name was the Word of God.</i> Compare <scripRef id="iJo.i-p3.4" osisRef="Bible:1John.1.1 Bible:1John.5.7 Bible:John.1.1 Bible:Rev.19.13" parsed="|1John|1|1|0|0;|1John|5|7|0|0;|John|1|1|0|0;|Rev|19|13|0|0" passage="1Jo 1:1,5:7;Joh 1:1;Re 19:13"><i>ch.</i> i. 1 and v. 7 with John
i. 1 and Rev. xix. 13</scripRef>. They agree in the commendation of
God's love to us (<scripRef id="iJo.i-p3.5" osisRef="Bible:1John.3.1 Bible:1John.4.9 Bible:John.3.16" parsed="|1John|3|1|0|0;|1John|4|9|0|0;|John|3|16|0|0" passage="1Jo 3:1,4:9;Joh 3:16"><i>ch.</i> iii. 1 and <i>ch.</i> iv. 9; John
iii. 16</scripRef>), and in speaking of our regeneration, or being
born of God, <scripRef id="iJo.i-p3.6" osisRef="Bible:1John.3.9 Bible:1John.4.7 Bible:1John.5.1 Bible:John.3.5-John.3.6" parsed="|1John|3|9|0|0;|1John|4|7|0|0;|1John|5|1|0|0;|John|3|5|3|6" passage="1Jo 3:9,4:7,5:1;Joh 3:5,6"><i>ch.</i> iii. 9; iv. 7; and v. 1;
John iii. 5, 6</scripRef>. Lastly (to add no more instances, which
may be easily seen in comparing this epistle with that gospel),
they agree in the allusion to, or application of, that passage in
that gospel which relates (and which alone relates) the issuing of
water and blood out of the Redeemer's opened side: <i>This is he
that came by water and blood,</i> <scripRef id="iJo.i-p3.7" osisRef="Bible:1John.5.6" parsed="|1John|5|6|0|0" passage="1Jo 5:6"><i>ch.</i> v. 6</scripRef>. Thus the epistle plainly
appears to flow from the same pen as that gospel did. Now I know
not that the text, or the intrinsic history of any of the gospels,
gives us such assurance of its writer or penman as that ascribed to
John plainly does. There (viz. <scripRef id="iJo.i-p3.8" osisRef="Bible:John.21.24" parsed="|John|21|24|0|0" passage="Joh 21:24"><i>ch.</i> xxi. 24</scripRef>) the sacred historian
thus notifies himself: <i>This is the disciple that testifieth of
these things and wrote these things; and we know that his testimony
is true.</i> Now who is this disciple, but he concerning whom Peter
asked, <i>What shall this man do?</i> And concerning whom the Lord
answered, <i>If I will that he tarry till I come, what is that to
thee?</i> (<scripRef id="iJo.i-p3.9" osisRef="Bible:John.5.22" parsed="|John|5|22|0|0" passage="Joh 5:22"><i>v.</i> 22</scripRef>).
And who (<scripRef id="iJo.i-p3.10" osisRef="Bible:John.5.20" parsed="|John|5|20|0|0" passage="Joh 5:20"><i>v.</i> 20</scripRef>) is
described by these three characters:—1. <i>That he is the
disciple whom Jesus loved,</i> the Lord's peculiar friend. 2.
<i>That he also leaned on his breast at supper.</i> 3. That he said
unto him, <i>Lord, who is he that betrayeth thee?</i> As sure then
as it is that that disciple was John, so sure may the church be
that that gospel and this epistle came from the beloved John.</p>
<p class="indent" id="iJo.i-p4">The epistle is styled <i>general,</i> as
being not inscribed to any particular church; it is, as a circular
letter (or visitation charge), sent to divers churches (some say of
Parthia), in order to confirm them in their stedfast adherence to
the Lord Christ, and the sacred doctrines concerning his person and
office, against seducers; and to instigate them to adorn that
doctrine by love to God and man, and particularly to each other, as
being descended from God, united by the same head, and travelling
towards the same eternal life.</p>
</div2>