mh_parser/scraps/Lev_12_1-Lev_12_5.html
2023-12-17 15:08:46 -05:00

2 lines
2.9 KiB
HTML
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

<p>The law here pronounces women lying-in ceremonially unclean. The Jews say, “The law extended even to an abortion, if the child was so formed as that the sex was distinguishable.” 1. There was some time of strict separation immediately after the birth, which continued seven days for a son and fourteen for a daughter, <a class="bibleref" title="Lev.12.2,Lev.12.5" href="/passage/?search=Lev.12.2,Lev.12.5"><span class="bibleref" title="Lev.12.2">Lev. 12:2</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Lev.12.5">5</span></a>. During these days she was separated from her husband and friends, and those that necessarily attended her were ceremonially unclean, which was one reason why the males were not circumcised till the eighth day, because they participated in the mothers pollution during the days of her separation. 2. There was also a longer time appointed for their purifying; thirty-three days more (forty in all) if the birth were a male, and double that time if a female, <a class="bibleref" title="Lev.12.4,Lev.12.5" href="/passage/?search=Lev.12.4,Lev.12.5"><span class="bibleref" title="Lev.12.4">Lev. 12:4</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Lev.12.5">5</span></a>. During this time they were only separated from the sanctuary and forbidden to eat of the passover, or peace-offerings, or, if a priests wife, to eat of any thing that was holy to the Lord. Why the time of both those was double for a female to what it was for a male I can assign no reason but the will of the Law-maker; in Christ Jesus no difference is made of male and female, <a class="bibleref" title="Gal.3.28,Col.3.11" href="/passage/?search=Gal.3.28,Col.3.11"><span class="bibleref" title="Gal.3.28">Gal. 3:28</span>; <span class="bibleref" title="Col.3.11">Col. 3:11</span></a>. But this ceremonial uncleanness which the law laid women in child-bed under was to signify the pollution of sin which we are all conceived and born in, <a class="bibleref" title="Ps.51.5" href="/passage/?search=Ps.51.5">Ps. 51:5</a>. For, if the root be impure, so is the branch, <i>Who can bring a clean thing out of an unclean</i>? If sin had not entered, nothing but purity and honour had attended all the productions of that great blessing, <i>Be fruitful and multiply</i>; but now that the nature of man is degenerated the propagation of that nature is laid under these marks of disgrace, because of the sin and corruption that are propagated with it, and in remembrance of the curse upon the woman that was first in the transgression. That <i>in sorrow</i> (to which it is here further added <i>in shame</i>) she should <i>bring forth children</i>. And the exclusion of the woman for so many days from the sanctuary, and all participation of the holy things, signified that our original corruption (that sinning sin which we brought into the world with us) would have excluded us for ever from the enjoyment of God and his favours if he had not graciously provided for our purifying.</p>