mh_parser/scraps/John_8_38-John_8_47.html

<p>Here Christ and the Jews are still at issue; he sets himself to convince and convert them, while they still set themselves to contradict and oppose him.</p>
<p class="tab-1">I. He here traces the difference between his sentiments and theirs to a different rise and origin (<a class="bibleref" title="John.8.38" href="/passage/?search=John.8.38">John 8:38</a>): <i>I speak that which I have seen with my Father</i>, and <i>you</i> do <i>what you have seen with your father</i>. Here are two fathers spoken of, according to the two families into which the sons of men are divided—God and the devil, and without controversy these are contrary the one to the other.</p>
<p class="tab-1">1. Christ’s <i>doctrine</i> was from <i>heaven</i>; it was <i>copied</i> out of the <i>counsels</i> of infinite wisdom, and the kind intentions of eternal love. (1.) <i>I speak that which I have seen</i>. The discoveries Christ has made to us of God and another world are not grounded upon guess and hearsay, but upon ocular inspection; so that he was thoroughly <i>apprized</i> of the nature, and <i>assured</i> of the truth, of all he said. He that is given to be a witness to the people is an eye-witness, and therefore unexceptionable. (2.) It is what I have seen <i>with my Father</i>. The doctrine of Christ is not a plausible hypothesis, supported by probable arguments, but it is an exact counterpart of the incontestable truths lodged in the eternal mind. It was not only what he had <i>heard from</i> his Father, but what he had <i>seen with him</i> when <i>the counsel of peace was between them both</i>. Moses spoke what he heard from God, but he might not see the face of God; Paul had been in the third heaven, but what he had seen there he could not, he must not, utter; for it was Christ’s prerogative to have <i>seen</i> what he <i>spoke</i>, and to <i>speak</i> what he had <i>seen</i>.</p>
<p class="tab-1">2. Their <i>doings</i> were from hell: “<i>You do that which you have seen with your father</i>. You do, by your own works, father yourselves, for it is evident whom you resemble, and therefore easy to find out your origin.” As a child that is trained up with his father learns his father’s words and fashions, and grows like him by an affected imitation as well as by a natural image, so these Jews, by their malicious opposition to Christ and the gospel, made themselves as like the devil as if they had industriously set him before them for their pattern.</p>
<p class="tab-1">II. He takes off and answers their vain-glorious boasts of relation to Abraham and to God as their fathers, and shows the vanity and falsehood of their pretensions.</p>
<p class="tab-1">1. They pleaded relation to Abraham, and he replies to this plea. <i>They said, Abraham is our father</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="John.8.39" href="/passage/?search=John.8.39">John 8:39</a>. In this they intended, (1.) To do honour to themselves, and to make themselves look great. They had forgotten the mortification given them by that acknowledgement prescribed them (<a class="bibleref" title="Deut.26.5" href="/passage/?search=Deut.26.5">Deut. 26:5</a>), <i>A Syrian ready to perish was my father</i>; and the charge exhibited against their degenerate ancestors (whose steps they trod in, and not those of the first founder of the family), <i>Thy father was an Amorite, and thy mother a Hittite</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Ezek.16.3" href="/passage/?search=Ezek.16.3">Ezek. 16:3</a>. As it is common for those families that are sinking and going to decay to boast most of their pedigree, so it is common for those churches that are corrupt and depraved to value themselves upon their antiquity and the eminence of their first planters. <i>Fuimus Troes, fuit Ilium—We have been Trojans, and there once was Troy</i>. (2.) They designed to cast an odium upon Christ as if he reflected upon the patriarch Abraham, in speaking of their father as one they had learned evil from. See how they sought an occasion to quarrel with him. Now Christ overthrows this plea, and exposes the vanity of it by a plain and cogent argument: “Abraham’s children will do the works of Abraham, but you do not do Abraham’s works, therefore you are not Abraham’s children.”</p>
<p class="tab-1">[1.] The proposition is plain: “<i>If you were Abraham’s children</i>, such children of Abraham as could claim an interest in the covenant made with him and his seed, which would indeed put an honour upon you, then you would <i>do the works of Abraham</i>, for to those only of Abraham’s house who <i>kept the way of the Lord</i>, as Abraham did, would God <i>perform what he had spoken</i>,” <a class="bibleref" title="Gen.18.19" href="/passage/?search=Gen.18.19">Gen. 18:19</a>. Those only are reckoned the seed of Abraham, to whom the promise belongs, who <i>tread in the steps</i> of his faith and obedience, <a class="bibleref" title="Rom.4.12" href="/passage/?search=Rom.4.12">Rom. 4:12</a>. Though the Jews had their genealogies, and kept them exact, yet they could not by them make out their relation to Abraham, so as to take the benefit of the old entail (<i>performam doni—according to the form of the gift</i>), unless they walked in the same spirit; good women’s relation to Sarah is proved only by this—<i>whose daughters you are as long as you do well</i>, and no longer, <a class="bibleref" title="1Pet.3.6" href="/passage/?search=1Pet.3.6">1 Pet. 3:6</a>. Note, Those who would approve themselves Abraham’s seed must not only be of Abraham’s faith, but do Abraham’s works (<a class="bibleref" title="Jas.2.21,Jas.2.22" href="/passage/?search=Jas.2.21,Jas.2.22"><span class="bibleref" title="Jas.2.21">Jas. 2:21</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Jas.2.22">22</span></a>),—must come at God’s call, as he did,—must resign their dearest comforts to him,—must be strangers and sojourners in this world,—must keep up the worship of God in their families, and always walk before God in their uprightness; for these were the works of Abraham.</p>
<p class="tab-1">[2.] The assumption is evident likewise: <i>But you do not do</i> the works of Abraham, for <i>you seek to kill me, a man that has told you the truth, which I have heard of God; this did not Abraham</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="John.8.40" href="/passage/?search=John.8.40">John 8:40</a>.</p>
<p class="tab-1"><i>First</i>, He shows them what their work was, their present work, which they were now about; they <i>sought to kill him</i>; and three things are intimated as an aggravation of their intention:—1. They were so <i>unnatural</i> as to seek the life of <i>a man</i>, a man like themselves, bone of their bone, and flesh of their flesh, who had done them no harm, nor given them any provocation. You <i>imagine mischief against a man</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Ps.62.3" href="/passage/?search=Ps.62.3">Ps. 62:3</a>. 2. They were so <i>ungrateful</i> as to seek the life of one who had <i>told them the truth</i>, had not only done them no injury, but had done them the greatest kindness that could be; had not only not imposed upon them with a lie, but had instructed them in the most necessary and important truths; <i>was he therefore become their enemy</i>? 3. They were so <i>ungodly</i> as to seek the life of one who told them the truth <i>which he had heard from God</i>, who was a messenger sent from God to them, so that their attempt against him was <i>quasi deicidium—an act of malice against God</i>. This was their work, and they persisted in it.</p>
<p class="tab-1"><i>Secondly</i>, He shows them that this did not become the children of Abraham; for <i>this did not Abraham</i>. 1. “He did nothing like this.” He was famous for his humanity, witness his rescue of the captives; and for his piety, witness his obedience to the heavenly vision in many instances, and some tender ones. Abraham believed God; they were obstinate in unbelief: Abraham followed God; they fought against him; so that he would be <i>ignorant of them, and would not acknowledge them</i>, they were so unlike him, <a class="bibleref" title="Isa.63.16" href="/passage/?search=Isa.63.16">Isa. 63:16</a>. See <a class="bibleref" title="Jer.22.15-Jer.22.17" href="/passage/?search=Jer.22.15-Jer.22.17">Jer. 22:15-17</a>. 2. “He would not have done thus if he had lived now, or I had lived then.” <i>Hoc Abraham non fecisset—He would not have done this</i>; so some read it. We should thus reason ourselves out of any way of wickedness; would Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob have done so? We cannot expect to be <i>ever with them</i>, if we be <i>never like them</i>.</p>
<p class="tab-1">[3.] The conclusion follows of course (<a class="bibleref" title="John.8.41" href="/passage/?search=John.8.41">John 8:41</a>): “Whatever your boasts and pretensions be, you are not Abraham’s children, but father yourselves upon another family (<a class="bibleref" title="John.8.41" href="/passage/?search=John.8.41">John 8:41</a>); there is <i>a father whose deeds you do</i>, whose spirit you are of, and whom you resemble.” He does not <i>yet</i> say plainly that he means the devil, till they by their continued cavils forced him so to explain himself, which teaches us to treat even bad men with civility and respect, and not to be forward to say that <i>of</i> them, or <i>to</i> them, which, though <i>true</i>, sounds <i>harsh</i>. He tried whether they would suffer their own consciences to infer from what he said that they were the devil’s children; and it is better to hear it from them now that we are called to <i>repent</i>, that is, to change our father and change our family, by changing our spirit and way, than to hear it from Christ in the great day.</p>
<p class="tab-1">2. So far were they from owning their unworthiness of relation to Abraham that they pleaded relation to God himself as their Father: “We are <i>not born of fornication</i>, we are not bastards, but legitimate sons; <i>we have one Father, even God</i>.”</p>
<p class="tab-1">(1.) Some understand this literally. They were not the sons of the bondwoman, as the Ishmaelites were; nor begotten in incest, as the Moabites and Ammonites were (<a class="bibleref" title="Deut.23.3" href="/passage/?search=Deut.23.3">Deut. 23:3</a>); nor were they a spurious brood in Abraham’s family, but Hebrews of the Hebrews; and, being born in <i>lawful</i> wedlock, they might call God <i>Father</i>, who instituted that honourable estate in innocency; for a legitimate seed, not tainted with divorces nor the plurality of wives, is called a <i>seed of God</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Mal.2.15" href="/passage/?search=Mal.2.15">Mal. 2:15</a>.</p>
<p class="tab-1">(2.) Others take it figuratively. They begin to be aware now that Christ spoke of a <i>spiritual</i> not a <i>carnal</i> father, of the father of their religion; and so,</p>
<p class="tab-1">[1.] They deny themselves to be a generation of idolaters: “We are <i>not born of fornication</i>, are not the children of idolatrous parents, nor have been bred up in idolatrous worships.” Idolatry is often spoken of as spiritual <i>whoredom</i>, and idolaters as <i>children of whoredoms</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Hos.2.4,Isa.57.3" href="/passage/?search=Hos.2.4,Isa.57.3"><span class="bibleref" title="Hos.2.4">Hos. 2:4</span>; <span class="bibleref" title="Isa.57.3">Isa. 57:3</span></a>. Now, if they meant that they were not the posterity of idolaters, the allegation was false, for no nation was more addicted to idolatry than the Jews before the captivity; if they meant no more than that they themselves were not idolaters, what then? A man may be free from idolatry, and yet perish in another iniquity, and be shut out of Abraham’s covenant. <i>If thou commit no idolatry</i> (apply it to this spiritual fornication), yet if thou kill thou art become a <i>transgressor</i> of the covenant. A rebellious prodigal son will be disinherited, though he be not <i>born of fornication</i>.</p>
<p class="tab-1">[2.] They boast themselves to be true worshippers of the true God. We have not many fathers, as the heathens had, <i>gods many and lords many</i>, and yet were without God, as <i>filius populi—a son of the people</i>, has many fathers and yet none certain; no, <i>the Lord our God is one Lord</i> and <i>one Father</i>, and therefore it is well with us. Note, Those flatter themselves, and put a damning cheat upon their own souls, who imagine that their professing the true religion and worshipping the true God will save them, though they worship not God in spirit and in truth, nor are true to their profession. Now our Saviour gives a full answer to this fallacious plea (<a class="bibleref" title="John.8.42,John.8.43" href="/passage/?search=John.8.42,John.8.43"><span class="bibleref" title="John.8.42">John 8:42</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="John.8.43">43</span></a>), and proves, by two arguments, that they had no right to call God Father.</p>
<p class="tab-1"><i>First</i>, They did not love Christ: <i>If God were your Father, you would love me</i>. He had disproved their relation to Abraham by their going about to kill him (<a class="bibleref" title="John.8.40" href="/passage/?search=John.8.40">John 8:40</a>), but here he disproves their relation to God by their not loving and owning him. A man may pass for a <i>child</i> of Abraham if he do not appear an enemy to Christ by gross sin; but he cannot approve himself a child of God unless he be a faithful friend and follower of Christ. Note, All that have God for their Father have a true love to Jesus Christ, and esteem of his person, a grateful sense of his love, a sincere affection to his cause and kingdom, a complacency in the salvation wrought out by him and in the method and terms of it, and a care to keep his commandments, which is the surest evidence of our love to him. We are here in a state of probation, upon our trial how we will conduct ourselves towards our Maker, and accordingly it will be with us in the state of retribution. God has taken various methods to prove us, and this was one: he sent his Son into the world, with sufficient proofs of his sonship and mission, concluding that all that called him Father would <i>kiss his Son</i>, and bid <i>him</i> welcome who was the first-born among many brethren; see <a class="bibleref" title="1John.5.1" href="/passage/?search=1John.5.1">1 John 5:1</a>. By this our adoption will be proved or disproved—Did we love Christ, or no? <i>If any man do not</i>, he is so far from being a child of God that he is <i>anathema</i>, accursed, <a class="bibleref" title="1Cor.16.22" href="/passage/?search=1Cor.16.22">1 Cor. 16:22</a>. Now our Saviour proves that if they were God’s children they would <i>love him</i>; for, saith he, I proceeded <i>forth and came from God</i>. They will love him; for, 1. He was the <i>Son of God: I proceeded forth from God</i>. <b><i>Exelthon</i></b> this means his divine <b><i>exeleusis</i></b>, or origin from the Father, by the communication of the divine essence, and also the union of the divine <b><i>logos</i></b> to his human nature; so Dr. Whitby. Now this could not but recommend him to the affections of all that were <i>born of God</i>. Christ is called the <i>beloved</i>, because, being the beloved of the Father, he is certainly the beloved of all the saints, <a class="bibleref" title="Eph.1.6" href="/passage/?search=Eph.1.6">Eph. 1:6</a>. 2. He was <i>sent of God</i>, came from him as an ambassador to the world of mankind. He did not <i>come of himself</i>, as the false prophets, who had not either their <i>mission</i> or their <i>message</i> from God, <a class="bibleref" title="Jer.23.21" href="/passage/?search=Jer.23.21">Jer. 23:21</a>. Observe the emphasis he lays upon this: <i>I came from God; neither came I of myself, but he sent me</i>. He had both his credentials and his instructions from God; he came to <i>gather together in one the children of God</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="John.11.51" href="/passage/?search=John.11.51">John 11:51</a>), to bring <i>many sons to glory</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Heb.2.10" href="/passage/?search=Heb.2.10">Heb. 2:10</a>. And would not all God’s children embrace with both arms a messenger sent from their Father on <i>such</i> errands? But these Jews made it appear that they were nothing akin to God, by their want of affection to Jesus Christ.</p>
<p class="tab-1"><i>Secondly</i>, They did not understand him. It was a sign they did not belong to God’s family that they did not understand the language and dialect of the family: <i>You do not understand my speech</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="John.8.43" href="/passage/?search=John.8.43">John 8:43</a>), <b><i>ten lalian ten emen</i></b>. Christ’s speech was divine and heavenly, but intelligible enough to those that were acquainted with the voice of Christ in the Old Testament. Those that had made the word of the Creator familiar to them needed no other key to the dialect of the Redeemer; and yet these Jews make strange of the doctrine of Christ, and find knots in it, and I know not what stumbling stones. Could a Galilean be known by his speech? An Ephraimite by his <i>sibboleth</i>? And would any have the confidence to call God Father to whom the Son of God was a barbarian, even when he spoke the will of God in the words of the Spirit of God? Note, Those who are not acquainted with the divine speech have reason to fear that they are strangers to the divine nature. Christ spoke the words of God (<a class="bibleref" title="John.3.34" href="/passage/?search=John.3.34">John 3:34</a>) in the dialect of the kingdom of God; and yet they, who pretended to belong to the kingdom, understood not the idioms and properties of it, but like strangers, and rude ones too, ridiculed it. And the reason why they did not understand Christ’s speech made the matter much worse: <i>Even because you cannot hear my word</i>, that is, “You cannot persuade yourselves to hear it attentively, impartially, and without prejudice, as it should be heard.” The meaning of this <i>cannot</i> is an obstinate <i>will not</i>; as the Jews could not hear Stephen (<a class="bibleref" title="Acts.7.57" href="/passage/?search=Acts.7.57">Acts 7:57</a>) nor Paul, <a class="bibleref" title="Acts.23.22" href="/passage/?search=Acts.23.22">Acts 23:22</a>. Note, The rooted antipathy of men’s corrupt hearts to the doctrine of Christ is the true reason of their ignorance of it, and of their errors and mistakes about it. They do not like it nor love it, and therefore they will not understand it; like Peter, who pretended he <i>knew not what the damsel said</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="Matt.26.70" href="/passage/?search=Matt.26.70">Matt. 26:70</a>), when in truth he knew not what to say to it. <i>You cannot hear my words</i>, for you have <i>stopped your ears</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="Ps.58.4,Ps.58.5" href="/passage/?search=Ps.58.4,Ps.58.5"><span class="bibleref" title="Ps.58.4">Ps. 58:4</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Ps.58.5">5</span></a>), and God, in a way of righteous judgment, <i>has made your ears heavy</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Isa.6.10" href="/passage/?search=Isa.6.10">Isa. 6:10</a>.</p>
<p class="tab-1">III. Having thus disproved their relation both to Abraham and to God, he comes next to tell them plainly whose children they were: <i>You are of your father the devil</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="John.8.44" href="/passage/?search=John.8.44">John 8:44</a>. If they were not God’s children, they were the devil’s, for God and Satan divide the world of mankind; the devil is <i>therefore</i> said to <i>work in the children of disobedience</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Eph.2.2" href="/passage/?search=Eph.2.2">Eph. 2:2</a>. All wicked people are the devil’s children, <i>children of Belial</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="2Cor.6.15" href="/passage/?search=2Cor.6.15">2 Cor. 6:15</a>), the serpent’s seed (<a class="bibleref" title="Gen.3.15" href="/passage/?search=Gen.3.15">Gen. 3:15</a>), children of the wicked one, <a class="bibleref" title="Matt.13.38" href="/passage/?search=Matt.13.38">Matt. 13:38</a>. They partake of his nature, bear his image, obey his commands, and follow his example. Idolaters <i>said to a stock, Thou art our father</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Jer.2.27" href="/passage/?search=Jer.2.27">Jer. 2:27</a>.</p>
<p class="tab-1">This is a high charge, and sounds very harsh and horrid, that any of the children of men, especially the church’s children, should be called <i>children of the devil</i>, and therefore our Saviour fully proves it.</p>
<p class="tab-1">1. By a general argument: <i>The lusts of your father you will do</i>, <b><i>thelete poiein</i></b>. (1.) “You <i>do</i> the devil’s lusts, the lusts which he would have you to fulfil; you gratify and please him, and comply with his temptation, and are <i>led captive by him at his will</i>: nay, you do those lusts which the devil himself fulfils.” Fleshly lusts and worldly lusts the devil tempts men to; but, being a spirit, he cannot fulfil them himself. The peculiar lusts of the devil are <i>spiritual wickedness</i>; the lusts of the intellectual powers, and their corrupt reasonings; pride and envy, and wrath and malice; enmity to that which is good, and enticing others to that which is evil; these are lusts which the devil fulfils, and those who are under the dominion of these lusts resemble the devil, as the child does the parent. The more there is of contemplation, and contrivance, and secret complacency, in sin, the more it resembles the <i>lusts of the devil</i>. (2.) You <i>will do</i> the devil’s lusts. The more there is of the <i>will</i> in these lusts, the more there is of the devil in them. When sin is committed <i>of choice</i> and not by surprise, with <i>pleasure</i> and not with reluctancy, when it is persisted in with a daring presumption and a desperate resolution, like theirs that said, <i>We have loved strangers and after them we will go</i>, then the sinner <i>will</i> do the devil’s lusts. “The lusts of your father you <i>delight to do</i>;” so Dr. Hammond; they are rolled under the tongue as a sweet morsel.</p>
<p class="tab-1">2. By two particular instances, wherein they manifestly resembled the devil—<i>murder</i> and <i>lying</i>. The devil is an enemy to life, because God is the God of life and life is the happiness of man; and an enemy to truth, because God is the God of truth and truth is the bond of human society.</p>
<p class="tab-1">(1.) He was <i>a murderer from the beginning</i>, not from his own beginning, for he was created an angel of light, and had a first estate which was pure and good, but from the beginning of his apostasy, which was soon after the creation of man. He was <b><i>anthropoktonos</i></b>—<i>homicida, a man-slayer</i>. [1.] He was a <i>hater of man</i>, and so in affection an disposition a murderer of him. He has his name, <i>Satan</i>, from <i>sitnah—hatred</i>. He maligned God’s image upon man, envied his happiness, and earnestly desired his ruin, was an avowed enemy to the whole race. [2.] He was man’s tempter to <i>that</i> sin which brought death into the world, and so he was effectually the murderer of all mankind, which in Adam had but <i>one neck</i>. He was a murderer of souls, <i>deceived</i> them into sin, and by it <i>slew them</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="Rom.7.11" href="/passage/?search=Rom.7.11">Rom. 7:11</a>), poisoned man with the forbidden fruit, and, to aggravate the matter, made him his own murderer. Thus he was not only <i>at</i> the beginning, but <i>from</i> the beginning, which intimates that thus he <i>has been</i> ever since; as he began, so he continues, the murderer of men by his temptations. The great tempter is the great destroyer. The Jews called the devil <i>the angel of death</i>. [3.] He was the first wheel in the first murder that ever was committed by Cain, who was of that wicked one, and slew his brother, <a class="bibleref" title="1John.3.12" href="/passage/?search=1John.3.12">1 John 3:12</a>. If the devil had not been very strong in Cain, he could not have done such an unnatural thing as to kill his own brother. Cain killing his brother by the instigation of the devil, the devil is called the <i>murderer</i>, which does not speak Cain’s personal guilt the less, but the devil’s the more, whose torments, we have reason to think, will be the greater, when the time comes, for all that wickedness into which he has drawn men. See what reason we have to <i>stand</i> upon our guard <i>against the wiles of the devil</i>, and never to hearken to him (for he is a murderer, and certainly aims to do us mischief, even when he <i>speaks fair</i>), and to wonder that he who is the murderer of the children of men should yet be, by their own consent, so much their master. Now herein these Jews were followers of him, and were murderers, like him; murderers of souls, which they led blindfold into the ditch, and made the <i>children of hell</i>; sworn enemies of Christ, and now ready to be his betrayers and murderers, for the same reason that Cain killed Abel. These Jews were that <i>seed of the serpent</i> that were to <i>bruise the heel</i> of the <i>seed of the woman; Now you seek to kill me</i>.</p>
<p class="tab-1">(2.) He was <i>a liar</i>. A lie is opposed to truth (<a class="bibleref" title="1John.2.21" href="/passage/?search=1John.2.21">1 John 2:21</a>), and accordingly the devil is here described to be,</p>
<p class="tab-1">[1.] An enemy to truth, and therefore to Christ. <i>First</i>, He is a <i>deserter</i>, from the truth; he <i>abode not in the truth</i>, did not continue in the purity and rectitude of his nature wherein he was created, but left his first state; when he degenerated from goodness, he departed from truth, for his apostasy was founded in a lie. The angels were the <i>hosts of the Lord</i>; those that fell were not <i>true</i> to their commander and sovereign, they were not to be <i>trusted</i>, being charged with folly and defection, <a class="bibleref" title="Job.4.18" href="/passage/?search=Job.4.18">Job 4:18</a>. By <i>the truth</i> here we may understand the revealed will of God concerning the salvation of man by Jesus Christ, the truth which Christ was now preaching, and which the Jews opposed; herein they did <i>like their father the devil</i>, who, <i>seeing</i> the honour put upon the human nature in the <i>first Adam</i>, and <i>foreseeing</i> the much greater honour intended in the <i>second Adam</i>, would not be reconciled to that counsel of God, nor <i>stand in the truth</i> concerning it, but, from a spirit of pride and envy, set himself to resist it, and to thwart the designs of it; and so did these Jews here, as his children and agents. <i>Secondly</i>, He is <i>destitute</i> of the truth: <i>There is no truth in him</i>. His interest in the world is supported by lies and falsehoods, and there is no truth, nothing you can confide in, in him, nor in any thing he says or does. The notions he propagates concerning good and evil are false and erroneous, his proofs are lying wonders, his temptations are all cheats; he has great knowledge of the truth, but having no affection to it, but on the contrary being a sworn enemy to it, he is said to have <i>no truth in him</i>.</p>
<p class="tab-1">[2.] He is a friend and patron of lying: <i>When he speaketh a lie he speaketh of his own</i>. Three things are here said of the devil with reference to the sin of lying:—<i>First</i>, That he is <i>a liar</i>; his oracles were lying oracles, his prophets lying prophets, and the images in which he was worshipped <i>teachers of lies</i>. He tempted our first parents with a downright lie. All his temptations are carried on by lies, calling <i>evil good and good evil</i>, and promising impunity in sin; he knows them to be lies, and suggests them with an intention to deceive, and so to destroy. When he now <i>contradicted</i> the gospel, in the scribes and Pharisees, it was by lies; and when afterwards he <i>corrupted it</i>, in the <i>man of sin</i>, it was by strong delusions, and a great complicated lie. <i>Secondly</i>, That when he <i>speaks a lie</i> he <i>speaks of his own</i>, <b><i>ek ton idion</i></b>. It is the proper <i>idiom</i> of his language; of <i>his own</i>, not of God; his Creator never put it into him. When men speak a lie they borrow it from the devil, <i>Satan fills their hearts to lie</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="Acts.5.3" href="/passage/?search=Acts.5.3">Acts 5:3</a>); but when the devil speaks a lie the <i>model</i> of it is of his own framing, the motives to it are from himself, which bespeaks the desperate depth of wickedness into which those apostate spirits are sunk; as in their first defection they had no tempter, so their sinfulness is still their own. <i>Thirdly</i>, That he is the <i>father of it</i>, <b><i>autou</i></b>. 1. He is the father of every <i>lie</i>; not only of the lies which he himself suggests, but of those which others speak; he is the author and founder of all lies. When men speak lies, they speak from him, and as his mouth; they come originally from him, and bear his image. 2. He is the father of <i>every liar</i>; so it may be understood. God made men with a disposition to truth. It is congruous to reason and natural light, to the order of our faculties and the laws of society, that we should speak truth; but the devil, the author of sin, the spirit that works in the children of disobedience, has so corrupted the nature of man that the wicked are said to be <i>estranged from the womb, speaking lies</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="Ps.58.3" href="/passage/?search=Ps.58.3">Ps. 58:3</a>); he has taught them <i>with their tongues to use deceit</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Rom.3.13" href="/passage/?search=Rom.3.13">Rom. 3:13</a>. He is the father of liars, who begat them, who trained them up in the <i>way of lying</i>, whom they resemble and obey, and with whom all <i>liars</i> shall have their portion for ever.</p>
<p class="tab-1">IV. Christ, having thus proved all murderers and all liars to be the devil’s children, leaves it to the consciences of his hearers to say, <i>Thou art the man</i>. But he comes in the <a class="bibleref" title="John.8.45-John.8.58" href="/passage/?search=John.8.45-John.8.58">John 8:45-58</a> to assist them in the application of it to themselves; he does not call them <i>liars</i>, but shows them that they were <i>no friends to truth</i>, and therein resembled him who <i>abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him</i>. Two things he charges upon them:—</p>
<p class="tab-1">1. That they would not <i>believe the word of truth</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="John.8.45" href="/passage/?search=John.8.45">John 8:45</a>), <b><i>hoti ten aletheian lego, ou pisteuete moi</i></b>.</p>
<p class="tab-1">(1.) Two ways it may be taken;-- [1.] “Though I tell you the truth, yet you will not believe me (<b><i>hoti</i></b>), <i>that I do so</i>.” Though he gave abundant proof of his commission from God, and his affection to the children of men, yet they would not believe that he told them the truth. Now was <i>truth fallen in the street</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Isa.59.14,Isa.59.15" href="/passage/?search=Isa.59.14,Isa.59.15"><span class="bibleref" title="Isa.59.14">Isa. 59:14</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Isa.59.15">15</span></a>. The greatest truths with some gained not the least credit; for they <i>rebelled against the light</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Job.24.13" href="/passage/?search=Job.24.13">Job 24:13</a>. Or, [2.] <i>Because I tell you the truth</i> (so we read it) therefore <i>you believe me not</i>. They would not receive him, nor entertain him as a prophet, because he told them some unpleasing truths which they did not care to hear, told them the truth concerning themselves and their own case, showed them their faces in a glass that would not flatter them; therefore they would not believe a word he said. Miserable is the case of those to whom the light of divine truth is become a torment.</p>
<p class="tab-1">(2.) Now, to show them the unreasonableness of their infidelity, he condescends to put the matter to this fair issue, <a class="bibleref" title="John.8.46" href="/passage/?search=John.8.46">John 8:46</a>. He and they being contrary, either he was in an error or they were. Now take it either way.</p>
<p class="tab-1">[1.] If <i>he</i> were in an error, why did they not convince him? The falsehood of <i>pretended</i> prophets was discovered either by the <i>ill tendency</i> of their doctrines (<a class="bibleref" title="Deut.13.2" href="/passage/?search=Deut.13.2">Deut. 13:2</a>), or by the <i>ill tenour</i> of their conversation: <i>You shall know them by their fruits</i>; but (saith Christ) <i>which of you</i>, you of the sanhedrim, that take upon you to judge of prophets, <i>which of you convinceth me of sin</i>? They accused him of some of the worst of crimes—gluttony, drunkenness, blasphemy, sabbath-breaking, confederacy with Satan, and what not. But their accusations were malicious groundless calumnies, and such as every one that knew him knew to be <i>utterly false</i>. When they had done their utmost by trick and artifice, subornation and perjury, to prove some crime upon him, the very judge that condemned him owned he <i>found no fault in him</i>. The <i>sin</i> he here challenges them to convict him of is, <i>First</i>, An inconsistent doctrine. They had heard his testimony; could they show any thing in it absurd or unworthy to be believed, any contradiction either of himself or of the scriptures, or any corruption of truth or manners insinuated by his doctrine? <a class="bibleref" title="John.18.20" href="/passage/?search=John.18.20">John 18:20</a>. Or, <i>Secondly</i>, An incongruous conversation: “Which of you can justly charge me with any thing, in word or deed, unbecoming a prophet?” See the wonderful condescension of our Lord Jesus, that he demanded not credit any further than the allowed motives of credibility supported his demands. See <a class="bibleref" title="Jer.2.5,Jer.2.31,Mic.6.3" href="/passage/?search=Jer.2.5,Jer.2.31,Mic.6.3"><span class="bibleref" title="Jer.2.5">Jer. 2:5</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Jer.2.31">31</span>; <span class="bibleref" title="Mic.6.3">Mic. 6:3</span></a>. Ministers may hence learn, 1. To <i>walk</i> so <i>circumspectly</i> as that it may not be in the power of their most strict observers to convince them of sin, <i>that the ministry be not blamed</i>. The only way not to be convicted of sin is not to sin. 2. To be willing to <i>admit a scrutiny</i>; though we are confident in many things that we are in the right, yet we should be willing to have it tried whether we be not in the wrong. See <a class="bibleref" title="Job.6.24" href="/passage/?search=Job.6.24">Job 6:24</a>.</p>
<p class="tab-1">[2.] If <i>they</i> were in an error, why were they not convinced by him? “<i>If I say the truth, why do you not believe me</i>? If you cannot convince me of error, you must own that I <i>say the truth</i>, and why do you not then <i>give me credit</i>? Why will you not deal with me upon trust?” Note, If men would but enquire into the reason of their infidelity, and examine why they do not believe that which they cannot gainsay, they would find themselves reduced to such absurdities as they could not but be ashamed of; for it will be found that the reason why we believe not in Jesus Christ is because we are not willing to part with our sins, and deny ourselves, and serve God faithfully; that we are not of the Christian religion, because we would not indeed be of any, and unbelief of our Redeemer resolves itself into a downright rebellion against our Creator.</p>
<p class="tab-1">2. Another thing charged upon them is that they would not hear the words of God (<a class="bibleref" title="John.8.47" href="/passage/?search=John.8.47">John 8:47</a>), which further shows how groundless their claim of relation to God was. Here is,</p>
<p class="tab-1">(1.) A doctrine laid down: <i>He that is of God heareth God’s words</i>; that is, [1.] He is <i>willing</i> and <i>ready</i> to hear them, is sincerely desirous to know what the mind of God is, and cheerfully embraces whatever he knows to be so. God’s words have such an authority over, and such an agreeableness with all that are born of God, that they meet them, as the child Samuel did, with, <i>Speak, Lord, for thy servant heareth</i>. Let the word of the Lord come. [2.] He <i>apprehends</i> and <i>discerns</i> them, he so hears them as to perceive the <i>voice of God</i> in them, which the natural man does not, <a class="bibleref" title="1Cor.2.14" href="/passage/?search=1Cor.2.14">1 Cor. 2:14</a>. He that is of God is <i>soon aware</i> of the discoveries he makes of himself of the <i>nearness of his name</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="Ps.75.1" href="/passage/?search=Ps.75.1">Ps. 75:1</a>), as they of the family know the master’s tread, and the master’s knock, and <i>open to him immediately</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="Luke.12.36" href="/passage/?search=Luke.12.36">Luke 12:36</a>), as the sheep know the voice of their shepherd from that of a stranger, <a class="bibleref" title="John.10.4,John.10.5,Song.2.8" href="/passage/?search=John.10.4,John.10.5,Song.2.8"><span class="bibleref" title="John.10.4">John 10:4</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="John.10.5">5</span>; <span class="bibleref" title="Song.2.8">Song 2:8</span></a>.</p>
<p class="tab-1">(2.) The application of this doctrine, for the conviction of these unbelieving Jews: <i>You therefore hear them not</i>; that is, “You heed not, you understand not, you believe not, the words of God, nor care to hear them, <i>because you are not of God</i>. Your being thus deaf and dead to the words of God is a plain evidence that you are <i>not of God</i>.” It is in his word that God manifests himself and is present among us; we are therefore reckoned to be well or ill affected to his word; see <a class="bibleref" title="2Cor.4.4,1John.4.6" href="/passage/?search=2Cor.4.4,1John.4.6"><span class="bibleref" title="2Cor.4.4">2 Cor. 4:4</span>; <span class="bibleref" title="1John.4.6">1 John 4:6</span></a>. Or, their not being of God was the reason why they did not profitably <i>hear the words of God</i>, which Christ spoke; they did not understand and believe him, not because the things themselves were obscure or wanted evidence, but because the hearers were <i>not of God</i>, were not born again. If the word of the kingdom do not bring forth fruit, the blame is to be laid upon the soil, not upon the seed, as appears by the parable of the sower, <a class="bibleref" title="Matt.13.3" href="/passage/?search=Matt.13.3">Matt. 13:3</a>.</p>