mh_parser/scraps/Jer_13_1-Jer_13_11.html
2023-12-17 15:08:46 -05:00

6 lines
9.0 KiB
HTML
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

<p>Here is, I. A sign, the marring of a girdle, which the prophet had worn for some time, by hiding it in a hole of a rock near the river Euphrates. It was usual with the prophets to teach by signs, that a stupid unthinking people might be brought to consider, and believe, and be affected with what was thus set before them. 1. He was to wear a linen girdle for some time, <a class="bibleref" title="Jer.13.1,Jer.13.2" href="/passage/?search=Jer.13.1,Jer.13.2"><span class="bibleref" title="Jer.13.1">Jer. 13:1</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Jer.13.2">2</span></a>. Some think he wore it under his clothes, because it was linen, and it is said to <i>cleave to his loins</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Jer.13.11" href="/passage/?search=Jer.13.11">Jer. 13:11</a>. It should rather seem to be worn upon his clothes, for it was worn for a name and a praise, and probably was a fine sash, such as officers wear and such as are commonly worn at this day in the eastern nations. He must <i>not put it in water</i>, but wear it as it was, that it might be the stronger, and less likely to rot: linen wastes almost as much with washing as with wearing. Being not wet, it was the more stiff and less apt to bend, yet he must make a shift to wear it. Probably it was very fine linen which will wear long without washing. The prophet, like John Baptist, was none of those that wore soft clothing, and therefore it would be the more strange to see him with a linen girdle on, who probably used to wear a leathern one. 2. After he had worn this linen girdle for some time, he must go, and <i>hide it in a hole of a rock</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="Jer.13.4" href="/passage/?search=Jer.13.4">Jer. 13:4</a>) by the waters side, where, when the water was high, it would be wet, and when it fell would grow dry again, and by that means would soon rot, sooner than if it were always wet or always dry. 3. After many days, he must look for it, and he should find it quite spoiled, gone all to rags and good for nothing, <a class="bibleref" title="Jer.13.7" href="/passage/?search=Jer.13.7">Jer. 13:7</a>. It has been of old a question among interpreters whether this was really done, so as to be seen and observed by the people, or only in a dream or vision, so as to go no further than the prophets own mind. It seems hard to imagine that the prophet should be sent on two such long journeys as to the river Euphrates, each of which would take him up some weeks time, when he could so ill be spared at home. For this reason most incline to think the journey, at least, was only in vision, like that of Ezekiel, from the captivity in Chaldea to Jerusalem (<a class="bibleref" title="Ezek.8.3" href="/passage/?search=Ezek.8.3">Ezek. 8:3</a>) and thence back to Chaldea (<a class="bibleref" title="Ezek.11.24" href="/passage/?search=Ezek.11.24">11:24</a>); and the explanation of this sign is given only to the prophet himself (<a class="bibleref" title="Jer.13.8" href="/passage/?search=Jer.13.8">Jer. 13:8</a>), not to the people, the sign not being public. But there being, it is probable, at that time, great conveniences of travelling between Jerusalem and Babylon, and some part of Euphrates being not so far off but that it was made the utmost border of the land of promise (<a class="bibleref" title="Josh.1.4" href="/passage/?search=Josh.1.4">Josh. 1:4</a>), I see no inconvenience in supposing the prophet to have made two journeys thither; for it is expressly said, <i>He did as the Lord commanded him</i>; and thus gave a signal proof of his obsequiousness to his God, to shame the stubbornness of a disobedient people: the toil of his journey would be very proper to signify both the pains they took to corrupt themselves with their idolatries and the sad fatigue of their captivity; and Euphrates being the river of Babylon, which was to be the place of their bondage, was a material circumstance in this sign.</p>
<p class="tab-1">II. The thing signified by this sign. The prophet was willing to be at any cost and pains to affect this people with the word of the Lord. Ministers must spend, and be spent, for the good of souls. We have the explanation of this sign, <a class="bibleref" title="Jer.13.9-Jer.13.11" href="/passage/?search=Jer.13.9-Jer.13.11">Jer. 13:9-11</a>.</p>
<p class="tab-1">1. The people of Israel had been to God as this girdle in two respects:—(1.) He had taken them into covenant and communion with himself: <i>As the girdle cleaves</i> very closely <i>to the loins of a man</i> and surrounds him, <i>so have I caused to cleave to me the houses of Israel and Judah</i>. They were a people near to God (<a class="bibleref" title="Ps.148.14" href="/passage/?search=Ps.148.14">Ps. 148:14</a>); they were his own, a peculiar people to him, a kingdom of priests that had access to him above other nations. He <i>caused them to cleave</i> to him by the law he gave them, the prophets he sent among them, and the favours which in his providence he showed them. He required their stated attendance in the courts of his house, and the frequent ratification of their covenant with him by sacrifices. Thus they were made so as to cleave to him that one would think they could never have been parted. (2.) He had herein designed his own honour. When he took them to be <i>to him for a people</i>, it was that they might be to him <i>for a name, and for a praise, and for a glory</i>, as a girdle is an ornament to a man, and particularly the <i>curious girdle of the ephod</i> was to the high-priest <i>for glory and for beauty</i>. Note, Those whom God takes to be to him for a people he intends to be to him for a praise. [1.] It is their duty to honour him, by observing his institutions and aiming therein at his glory, and thus adorning their profession. [2.] It is their happiness that he reckons himself honoured in them and by them. He is pleased with them, and glories in his relation to them, while they behave themselves as become his people. He was pleased to take it among the titles of his honour to be <i>the God of Israel</i>, even a <i>God to Israel</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="1Chr.17.24" href="/passage/?search=1Chr.17.24">1 Chron. 17:24</a>. In vain do we pretend to be to God for a people if we be not to him for a praise.</p>
<p class="tab-1">2. They had by their idolatries and other iniquities loosed themselves from him, thrown themselves at a distance, robbed him of the honour they owed him, buried themselves in the earth, and foreign earth too, mingled among the nations, and were so spoiled and corrupted that they were <i>good for nothing</i>: they could no more be to God, as they were designed, <i>for a name and a praise</i>, for they would not hear either their duty to do it or their privilege to value it: <i>They refused to hear the words of God</i>, by which they might have been kept still cleaving closely to him. <i>They walked in the imagination of their heart</i>, wherever their fancy led them; and denied themselves no gratification they had a mind to, particularly in their worship. They would not <i>cleave to God</i>, but <i>walked after other gods, to serve them</i>, and <i>to worship them</i>; they doted upon the gods of the heathen nations that lay towards Euphrates, so that they were quite spoiled for the service of their own God, and were as <i>this girdle</i>, this rotten girdle, a disgrace to their profession and not an ornament. A thousand pities it was that such a girdle should be so spoiled, that such a people should so wretchedly degenerate.</p>
<p class="tab-1">3. God would by his judgments separate them from him, send them into captivity, deface all their beauty and ruin their excellency, so that they should be like a fine girdle gone to rags, a worthless, useless, despicable people. God will after this manner <i>mar the pride of Judah, and the great pride of Jerusalem</i>. He would strip them of all that which was the matter of their pride, of which they boasted and in which they trusted; it should not only be sullied and stained, but quite destroyed, like this linen girdle. Observe, He speaks of <i>the pride of Judah</i> (the country people were proud of their holy land, their good land), but of <i>the great pride of Jerusalem</i>; there the temple was, and the royal palace, and therefore those citizens were more proud than the inhabitants of other cities. God takes notice of the degrees of mens pride, the pride of some and the great pride of others; and he will mar it, he will stain it. Pride will have a fall, for God resists the proud. He will either mar the pride that is in us (that is, mortify it by his grace, make us ashamed of it, and, like Hezekiah, humble us for the pride of our hearts, the great pride, and cure us of it, great as it is; and this marring of the pride will be making of the soul; happy for us if the humbling providences our hearts be humbled) or else he will mar the thing we are proud of. Parts, gifts, learning, power, external privileges, if we are proud of these, it is just with God to blast them; even the temple, when it became Jerusalems pride, was marred and laid in ashes. It is the honour of God to <i>took upon every one that is proud and abase him</i>.</p>