We may observe in this chapter, I. Our freedom
from the law further urged as an argument to press upon us
sanctification,
1 Know ye not, brethren, (for I speak to them that know the law,) how that the law hath dominion over a man as long as he liveth? 2 For the woman which hath a husband is bound by the law to her husband so long as he liveth; but if the husband be dead, she is loosed from the law of her husband. 3 So then if, while her husband liveth, she be married to another man, she shall be called an adulteress: but if her husband be dead, she is free from that law; so that she is no adulteress, though she be married to another man. 4 Wherefore, my brethren, ye also are become dead to the law by the body of Christ; that ye should be married to another, even to him who is raised from the dead, that we should bring forth fruit unto God. 5 For when we were in the flesh, the motions of sins, which were by the law, did work in our members to bring forth fruit unto death. 6 But now we are delivered from the law, that being dead wherein we were held; that we should serve in newness of spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter.
Among other arguments used in the foregoing
chapter to persuade us against sin, and to holiness, this was one
(
I. Our first marriage was to the law,
which, according to the law of marriage, was to continue only
during the life of the law. The law of marriage is binding till the
death of one of the parties, no matter which, and no longer. The
death of either discharges both. For this he appeals to themselves,
as persons knowing the law (
II. Our second marriage is to Christ: and how comes this about? Why,
1. We are freed, by death, from our
obligation to the law as a covenant, as the wife is from her
obligation to her husband,
2. We are married to Christ. The day of our
believing is the day of our espousals to the Lord Jesus. We enter
upon a life of dependence on him and duty to him: Married to
another, even to him who is raised from the dead, a periphrasis
of Christ and very pertinent here; for as our dying to sin and the
law is in conformity to the death of Christ, and the crucifying of
his body, so our devotedness to Christ in newness of life is in
conformity to the resurrection of Christ. We are married to the
raised exalted Jesus, a very honourable marriage. Compare
7 What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet. 8 But sin, taking occasion by the commandment, wrought in me all manner of concupiscence. For without the law sin was dead. 9 For I was alive without the law once: but when the commandment came, sin revived, and I died. 10 And the commandment, which was ordained to life, I found to be unto death. 11 For sin, taking occasion by the commandment, deceived me, and by it slew me. 12 Wherefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good. 13 Was then that which is good made death unto me? God forbid. But sin, that it might appear sin, working death in me by that which is good; that sin by the commandment might become exceeding sinful. 14a For we know that the law is spiritual:—
To what he had said in the former paragraph, the apostle here raises an objection, which he answers very fully: What shall we say then? Is the law sin? When he had been speaking of the dominion of sin, he had said so much of the influence of the law as a covenant upon that dominion that it might easily be misinterpreted as a reflection upon the law, to prevent which he shows from his own experience the great excellency and usefulness of the law, not as a covenant, but as a guide; and further discovers how sin took occasion by the commandment. Observe in particular,
I. The great excellency of the law in
itself. Far be it from Paul to reflect upon the law; no, he speaks
honourably of it. 1. It is holy, just, and good,
II. The great advantage that he had found
by the law. 1. It was discovering: I had not known sin but by
the law,
III. The ill use that his corrupt nature
made of the law notwithstanding. 1. Sin, taking occasion by the
commandment, wrought in me all manner of concupiscence,
14b—But I am carnal, sold under sin. 15 For that which I do I allow not: for what I would, that do I not; but what I hate, that do I. 16 If then I do that which I would not, I consent unto the law that it is good. 17 Now then it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me. 18 For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not. 19 For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do. 20 Now if I do that I would not, it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me. 21 I find then a law, that, when I would do good, evil is present with me. 22 For I delight in the law of God after the inward man: 23 But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members. 24 O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death? 25 I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin.
Here is a description of the conflict between grace and corruption in the heart, between the law of God and the law of sin. And it is applicable two ways:—1. To the struggles that are in a convinced soul, but yet unregenerate, in the person of whom it is supposed, by some, that Paul speaks. 2. To the struggles that are in a renewed sanctified soul, but yet in a state of imperfection; as other apprehend. And a great controversy there is of which of these we are to understand the apostle here. So far does the evil prevail here, when he speaks of one sold under sin, doing it, not performing that which is good, that it seems difficult to apply it to the regenerate, who are described to walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit; and yet so far does the good prevail in hating sin, consenting to the law, delighting in it, serving the law of God with the mind, that it is more difficult to apply it to the unregenerate that are dead in trespasses and sins.
I. Apply it to the struggles that are felt
in a convinced soul, that is yet in a state of sin, knows his
Lord's will, but does it not, approves the things that are more
excellent, being instructed out of the law, and yet lives in the
constant breach of it,
II. It seems rather to be understood of the
struggles that are maintained between grace and corruption in
sanctified souls. That there are remainders of indwelling
corruption, even where there is a living principle of grace, is
past dispute; that this corruption is daily breaking forth in sins
of infirmity (such as are consistent with a state of grace) is no
less certain. If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves,
1. What he complains of—the remainder of
indwelling corruptions, which he here speaks of, to show that the
law is insufficient to justify even a regenerate man, that the best
man in the world hath enough in him to condemn him, if God should
deal with him according to the law, which is not the fault of the
law, but of our own corrupt nature, which cannot fulfil the law.
The repetition of the same things over and over again in this
discourse shows how much Paul's heart was affected with what he
wrote, and how deep his sentiments were. Observe the particulars of
this complaint. (1.) I am carnal, sold under sin,
2. What he comforts himself with. The case was sad, but there were some allays. Three things comforted him:—
(1.) That his conscience witnessed for him
that he had a good principle ruling and prevailing in him,
notwithstanding. It is well when all does not go one way in the
soul. The rule of this good principle which he had was the law of
God, to which he here speaks of having a threefold regard, which is
certainly to be found in all that are sanctified, and no others.
[1.] I consent unto the law that it is good,
(2.) That the fault lay in that corruption
of his nature which he did really bewail and strive against: It
is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me. This he
mentions twice (
(3.) His great comfort lay in Jesus Christ
(