In this chapter the apostle prosecutes the
argument at the close of the last, and, I. Warns the Corinthians
against security, by the example of the Jews, who, notwithstanding
their profession and privileges, were terribly punished of God for
their many sins, their history being left upon record for the
admonition of Christians,
1 Moreover, brethren, I would not that ye should be ignorant, how that all our fathers were under the cloud, and all passed through the sea; 2 And were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea; 3 And did all eat the same spiritual meat; 4 And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ. 5 But with many of them God was not well pleased: for they were overthrown in the wilderness.
In order to dissuade the Corinthians from communion with idolaters, and security in any sinful course, he sets before them the example of the Jews, the church under the Old Testament. They enjoyed great privileges, but, having been guilty of heinous provocations, they fell under very grievous punishments. In these verses he reckons up their privileges, which, in the main, were the same with ours.
I. He prefaces this discourse with a note of regard: "Moreover, brethren, I would not that you should be ignorant. I would not have you without the knowledge of this matter; it is a thing worthy both of your knowledge and attention. It is a history very instructive and monitory." Judaism was Christianity under a veil, wrapt up in types and dark hints. The gospel was preached to them, in their legal rites and sacrifices. And the providence of God towards them, and what happened to them notwithstanding these privileges, may and ought to be warnings to us.
II. He specifies some of their privileges.
He begins, 1. With their deliverance from Egypt: "Our
fathers, that is, the ancestors of us Jews, were under the
cloud, and all passed through the sea. They were all under the
divine covering and conduct." The cloud served for both purposes:
it sometimes contracted itself into a cloudy pillar, shining on one
side to show them their way, dark on the other to hide them from
their pursuing enemies; and sometimes spread itself over them as a
mighty sheet, to defend them from the burning sun in the sandy
desert,
6 Now these things were our examples, to the intent we should not lust after evil things, as they also lusted. 7 Neither be ye idolaters, as were some of them; as it is written, The people sat down to eat and drink, and rose up to play. 8 Neither let us commit fornication, as some of them committed, and fell in one day three and twenty thousand. 9 Neither let us tempt Christ, as some of them also tempted, and were destroyed of serpents. 10 Neither murmur ye, as some of them also murmured, and were destroyed of the destroyer. 11 Now all these things happened unto them for ensamples: and they are written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the world are come. 12 Wherefore let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall. 13 There hath no temptation taken you but such as is common to man: but God is faithful, who will not suffer you to be tempted above that ye are able; but will with the temptation also make a way to escape, that ye may be able to bear it. 14 Wherefore, my dearly beloved, flee from idolatry.
The apostle, having recited their privileges, proceeds here to an account of their faults and punishments, their sins and plagues, which are left upon record for an example to us, a warning against the like sins, if we would escape the like punishments. We must not do as they did, lest we suffer as they suffered.
I. Several of their sins are specified as
cautions to us; as, 1. We should shun inordinate desires after
carnal objects: Not lust after evil things, as they lusted,
II. The apostle subjoins to these
particular cautions a more general one (
III. But to this word of caution he adds a
word of comfort,
IV. And upon this argument he grounds another caution against idolatry: Wherefore, my dearly beloved, flee from idolatry. Observe, 1. How he addresses them: My dearly beloved. It is out of tender affection to them that he presses this advice upon them. 2. The matter of his advice: "Flee idolatry; shun it, and all approaches towards it." Idolatry is the most heinous injury and affront to the true God; it is transferring his worship and honour to a rival. 3. The ground of this advice: "Seeing you have such encouragement to trust God, and to be faithful, do you approve yourselves men, be not shaken by any discouragements your heathen enemies may lay before you. God will succour and assist, help you in your trials, and help you out of them; and therefore be not guilty of any idolatrous compliances." Note, We have all the encouragement in the world to flee sin and prove faithful to God. We cannot fall by a temptation if we cleave fast to him.
15 I speak as to wise men; judge ye what I say. 16 The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ? 17 For we being many are one bread, and one body: for we are all partakers of that one bread. 18 Behold Israel after the flesh: are not they which eat of the sacrifices partakers of the altar? 19 What say I then? that the idol is any thing, or that which is offered in sacrifice to idols is any thing? 20 But I say, that the things which the Gentiles sacrifice, they sacrifice to devils, and not to God: and I would not that ye should have fellowship with devils. 21 Ye cannot drink the cup of the Lord, and the cup of devils: ye cannot be partakers of the Lord's table, and of the table of devils. 22 Do we provoke the Lord to jealousy? are we stronger than he?
In this passage the apostle urges the general caution against idolatry, in the particular case of eating the heathen sacrifices as such, and out of any religious respect to the idol to whom they were sacrificed.
I. He prefaces his argument with an appeal
to their own reason and judgment: "I speak to wise men, judge
you what I say,
II. He lays down his argument from the
Lord's supper: The cup which we bless, is it not the communion
of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the
communion of the body of Christ? Is not this sacred rite an
instrument of communion with God? Do we not therein profess to be
in friendship, and to have fellowship, with him? Is it not a token
whereby we professedly hold communion with Christ, whose body was
broken, and blood shed, to procure remission of our sins, and the
favour of God? And can we be in alliance with Christ, or friendship
with God, without being devoted to him? In short, the Lord's supper
is a feast on the sacrificed body and blood of our Lord, epulum
ex oblatis. And to eat of the feast is to partake of the
sacrifice, and so to be his guests to whom the sacrifice was
offered, and this in token of friendship with him. Thus to partake
of the Lord's table is to profess ourselves his guests and covenant
people. This is the very purpose and intention of this symbolical
eating and drinking; it is holding communion with God, and
partaking of those privileges, and professing ourselves under those
obligations, which result from the death and sacrifice of Christ;
and this in conjunction with all true Christians, with whom we have
communion also in this ordinance. Because the bread is one, we,
being many, are one body, for we are made partakers of one
bread, or loaf (
III. He confirms this from the Jewish worship and customs: Behold Israel after the flesh: are not those who eat of the sacrifices partakers of the altar, that is, of the sacrifice offered upon it? Those who were admitted to eat of the offerings were reckoned to partake of the sacrifice itself, as made for them, and to be sanctified thereby; and therefore surely to worship God, and be in alliance or covenant with him, even the God of Israel, to whom the sacrifice was made: this was a symbol or token of holding communion with him.
IV. He applies this to the argument against
feasting with idolaters on their sacrifices, and to prove those
that do so idolaters. This he does, 1. By following the principle
on which they would argue it to be lawful, namely, that an idol was
nothing. Many of them were nothing at all, none of them had any
divinity in them. What was sacrificed to idols was nothing, no way
changed from what it was before, but was every whit as fit for
food, considered in itself. They indeed seem to argue that, because
an idol was nothing, what was offered was no sacrifice, but common
and ordinary food, of which they might therefore eat with as little
scruple. Now the apostle allows that the food was not changed as to
its nature, was as fit to be eaten as common food, where it was set
before any who knew not of its having been offered to an idol. But,
2. He proves that the eating of it as a part of a heathen sacrifice
was, (1.) A partaking with them in their idolatry. It was having
fellowship with devils, because what the Gentiles sacrificed
they sacrificed to devils; and to feast with them upon these
sacrifices was to partake in the sacrifice, and therefore to
worship the god to whom it was made, and have fellowship or
communion with him just as he who eats the Lord's supper is
supposed to partake in the Christian sacrifice; or as those who ate
the Jewish sacrifices partook of what was offered on their altar.
But heathens sacrificed to devils: "Therefore do not feast on their
sacrifices. Doing it is a token of your having fellowship with the
demons to whom they are offered. I would not have you be in
communion with devils." (2.) It was a virtual renouncing of
Christianity: You cannot drink the cup of the Lord, and the cup
of devils: you cannot be partakers of the Lord's table, and the
table of devils,
V. He warns them, upon the whole, against
such idolatry, by signifying to them that God is a jealous God
(
23 All things are lawful for me, but all things are not expedient: all things are lawful for me, but all things edify not. 24 Let no man seek his own, but every man another's wealth. 25 Whatsoever is sold in the shambles, that eat, asking no question for conscience sake: 26 For the earth is the Lord's, and the fulness thereof. 27 If any of them that believe not bid you to a feast, and ye be disposed to go; whatsoever is set before you, eat, asking no question for conscience sake. 28 But if any man say unto you, This is offered in sacrifice unto idols, eat not for his sake that showed it, and for conscience sake: for the earth is the Lord's, and the fulness thereof: 29 Conscience, I say, not thine own, but of the other: for why is my liberty judged of another man's conscience? 30 For if I by grace be a partaker, why am I evil spoken of for that for which I give thanks? 31 Whether therefore ye eat, or drink, or whatsoever ye do, do all to the glory of God. 32 Give none offence, neither to the Jews, nor to the Gentiles, nor to the church of God: 33 Even as I please all men in all things, not seeking mine own profit, but the profit of many, that they may be saved.
In this passage the apostle shows in what instances, notwithstanding, Christians might lawfully eat what had been sacrificed to idols. They must not eat it out of religious respect to the idol, nor go into his temple, and hold a feast there, upon what they knew was an idol-sacrifice; nor perhaps out of the temple, if they knew it was a feast held upon a sacrifice, but there were cases wherein they might without sin eat what had been offered. Some such the apostle here enumerates.—But,
I. He gives a caution against abusing our liberty in lawful things. That may be lawful which is not expedient, which will not edify. A Christian must not barely consider what is lawful, but what is expedient, and for the use of edification. A private Christian should do so even in his private conduct. He must not seek his own only, but his neighbour's wealth. He must be concerned not to hurt his neighbour, nay, he must be concerned to promote his welfare; and must consider how to act so that he may help others, and not hinder them in their holiness, comfort, or salvation. Those who allow themselves in every thing not plainly sinful in itself will often run into what is evil by accident, and do much mischief to others. Every thing lawful in itself to be done is not therefore lawfully done. Circumstances may make that a sin which in itself is none. These must be weighed, and the expediency of an action, and its tendency to edification, must be considered before it be done. Note, The welfare of others, as well as our own convenience, must be consulted in many things we do, if we would do them well.
II. He tells them that what was sold in
the shambles they might eat without asking questions. The
priest's share of heathen sacrifices was thus frequently offered
for sale, after it had been offered in the temple. Now the apostle
tells them they need not be so scrupulous as to ask the butcher in
the market whether the meat he sold had been offered to an idol? It
was there sold as common food, and as such might be bought and
used; for the earth is the Lord's, and the fulness thereof
(
III. He adds that if they were invited by
any heathen acquaintances to a feast, they might go, and eat
what was set before them, without asking questions (
IV. Yet, even at such an entertainment, he adds, if any should say it was a thing that had been offered to idols, they should refrain: Eat not, for his sake that showed it, and for conscience' sake. Whether it were the master of the feast or any of the guests, whether it were spoken in the hearing of all or whispered in the ear, they should refrain for his sake who suggested this to them, whether he were an infidel or an infirm Christian; and for conscience' sake, out of regard to conscience, that they might show a regard to it in themselves, and keep up a regard to it in others. This he backs with the same reason as the former: For the earth is the Lord's. There is food enough provided by our common Lord, of which we maya eat without scruple. The same doctrine may be variously improved, as here: "The earth is the Lord's, therefore you may eat any thing without scruple that is set before you as common food; and yet, because the earth is the Lord's, eat nothing that will give offence, lay a stumbling-block before others, and encourage some in idolatry, or tempt others to eat when they are not clear in their own mind that it is lawful, and so sin, and wound their own consciences." Note, Christians should be very cautious of doing what may thus prejudice the consciences of others, and weaken their authority with them, which is by all means to be kept up.
V. He urges them to refrain where they will
give offence, while yet he allows it lawful to eat what was set
before them as common food, though it had been offered in
sacrifice. "Another man's conscience is no measure to our conduct.
What he thinks unlawful is not thereby made unlawful to me, but may
be a matter of liberty still; and as long as I own God as a giver
of my food, and render him thanks for it, it is very unjust to
reproach me for using it." This must be understood abstracted from
the scandal given by eating in the circumstance mentioned. Though
some understand it to mean, "Why should I, by using the liberty I
have, give occasion to those who are scandalized to speak evil of
me?" According to that advice of the apostle (
VI. The apostle takes occasion from this
discourse to lay down a rule for Christians' conduct, and apply it
to this particular case (
VII. He presses all upon them by his own
example: Even as I please all men (or study to do it) in
all things (that I lawfully can), not seeking my own profit,
but that of many, that they may be saved,