In this chapter we have, I. The discontent that
was among the disciples about the distribution of the public
charity,
1 And in those days, when the number of the disciples was multiplied, there arose a murmuring of the Grecians against the Hebrews, because their widows were neglected in the daily ministration. 2 Then the twelve called the multitude of the disciples unto them, and said, It is not reason that we should leave the word of God, and serve tables. 3 Wherefore, brethren, look ye out among you seven men of honest report, full of the Holy Ghost and wisdom, whom we may appoint over this business. 4 But we will give ourselves continually to prayer, and to the ministry of the word. 5 And the saying pleased the whole multitude: and they chose Stephen, a man full of faith and of the Holy Ghost, and Philip, and Prochorus, and Nicanor, and Timon, and Parmenas, and Nicolas a proselyte of Antioch: 6 Whom they set before the apostles: and when they had prayed, they laid their hands on them. 7 And the word of God increased; and the number of the disciples multiplied in Jerusalem greatly; and a great company of the priests were obedient to the faith.
Having seen the church's struggles with her enemies, and triumphed with her in her victories, we now come to take a view of the administration of her affairs at home; and here we have,
I. An unhappy disagreement among some of
the church-members, which might have been of ill consequence, but
was prudently accommodated and taken up in time (
1. It does our hearts good to find that the number of the disciples is multiplied, as, no doubt, it vexed the priests and Sadducees to the heart to see it. The opposition that the preaching of the gospel met with, instead of checking its progress, contributed to the success of it; and this infant Christian church, like the infant Jewish church in Egypt, the more it was afflicted, the more it multiplied. The preachers were beaten, threatened, and abused, and yet the people received their doctrine, invited, no doubt, thereto by their wonderful patience and cheerfulness under their trials, which convinced men that they were borne up and carried on by a better spirit than their own.
2. Yet it casts a damp upon us to find that
the multiplying of the disciples proves an occasion of discord.
Hitherto they were all with one accord. This had been often
taken notice of to their honour; but now that they were multiplied,
they began to murmur; as in the old world, when men began to
multiply, they corrupted themselves. Thou hast multiplied the
nation, and not increased their joy,
(1.) The complainants were the Grecians, or Hellenists, against the Hebrews—the Jews that were scattered in Greece, and other parts, who ordinarily spoke the Greek tongue, and read the Old Testament in the Greek version, and not the original Hebrew, many of whom being at Jerusalem at the feast embraced the faith of Christ, and were added to the church, and so continued there. These complained against the Hebrews, the native Jews, that used the original Hebrew of the Old Testament. Some of each of these became Christians, and, it seems, their joint-embracing of the faith of Christ did not prevail, as it ought to have done, to extinguish the little jealousies they had one of another before their conversion, but they retained somewhat of that old leaven; not understanding, or not remembering, that in Christ Jesus there is neither Greek nor Jew, no distinction of Hebrew and Hellenist, but all are alike welcome to Christ, and should be, for his sake, dear to one another.
(2.) The complaint of these Grecians was
that their widows were neglected in the daily
administration, that is in the distribution of the public
charity, and the Hebrew widows had more care taken of them.
Observe, The first contention in the Christian church was about a
money-matter; but it is a pity that the little things of this
world should be makebates among those that profess to be taken
up with the great things of another world. A great deal of
money was gathered for the relief of the poor, but, as often
happens in such cases, it was impossible to please every body in
the laying of it out. The apostles, at whose feet it was
laid, did their best to dispose of it so as to answer the
intentions of the donors, and no doubt designed to do it with the
utmost impartiality, and were far from respecting the Hebrews more
than the Grecians; and yet here they are complained to, and tacitly
complained of, that the Grecian widows were neglected;
though they were as real objects of charity, yet they had not so
much allowed them, or not to so many, or not so duly paid them, as
the Hebrews. Now, [1.] Perhaps this complaint was groundless and
unjust, and there was no cause for it; but those who, upon any
account, lie under disadvantages (as the Grecian Jews did, in
comparison with those that were Hebrews of the Hebrews) are apt to
be jealous that they are slighted when really they are not so; and
it is the common fault of poor people that, instead of being
thankful for what is given them, they are querulous and clamorous,
and apt to find fault that more is not given them, or that more is
given to others than to them; and there are envy and covetousness,
those roots of bitterness, to be found among the poor as well as
among the rich, notwithstanding the humbling providences they are
under, and should accommodate themselves to. But, [2.] We will
suppose there might be some occasion for their complaint.
First, Some suggest that though their other poor were well
provided for, yet their widows were neglected, because the managers
governed themselves by an ancient rule which the Hebrews observed,
that a widow was to be maintained by her husband's children.
See
II. The happy accommodating of this matter, and the expedient pitched upon for the taking away of the cause of this murmuring. The apostles had hitherto the directing of the matter. Applications were made to them, and appeals in cases of grievances. They were obliged to employ persons under them, who did not take all the care they might have taken, nor were so well fortified as they should have been against temptations to partiality; and therefore some persons must be chosen to manage this matter who have more leisure to attend to it than the apostles had, and were better qualified for the trust than those whom the apostles employed were. Now observe,
1. How the method was proposed by the apostles: They called the multitude of the disciples unto them, the heads of the congregations of Christians in Jerusalem, the principal leading men. The twelve themselves would not determine any thing without them, for in multitude of counsellors there is safety; and in an affair of this nature those might be best able to advise who were more conversant in the affairs of this life than the apostles were.
(1.) The apostles urge that they could by
no means admit so great a diversion, as this would be, from their
great work (
(2.) They therefore desire that seven
men might be chosen, well qualified for the purpose, whose
business it should be to serve tables, diakonein
trapezais—to be deacons to the tables,
[1.] The persons must be duly qualified.
The people are to choose, and the apostles to ordain; but the
people have no authority to choose, nor the apostles to ordain, men
utterly unfit for the office: Look out seven men; so many
they thought might suffice for the present, more might be added
afterwards if there were occasion. These must be, First, Of
honest report, men free from scandal, that were looked upon by
their neighbours as men of integrity, and faithful men, well
attested, as men that might be trusted, not under a blemish for any
vice, but, on the contrary, well spoken of for every thing that is
virtuous and praiseworthy; martyroumenous—men
that can produce good testimonials concerning their
conversation. Note, Those that are employed in any office in the
church ought to be men of honest report, of a blameless, nay, of an
admirable character, which is requisite not only to the credit of
their office, but to the due discharge of it. Secondly, They
must be full of the Holy Ghost, must be filled with those
gifts and graces of the Holy Ghost which were necessary to the
right management of this trust. They must not only be honest men,
but they must be men of ability and men of courage; such as were to
be made judges in Israel (
[2.] The people must nominate the persons: "Look you out among yourselves seven men; consider among yourselves who are the fittest for such a trust, and whom you can with the most satisfaction confide in." They might be presumed to know better, or at least were fitter to enquire, what character men had, than the apostles; and therefore they are entrusted with the choice.
[3.] They apostles will ordain them to the service, will give them their charge, that they may know what they have to do and make conscience of doing it, and give them their authority, that the persons concerned may know whom they are to apply to, and submit to, in affairs of that nature: Men, whom we may appoint. In many editions of our English Bibles there has been an error of the press here; for they have read it, whom ye may appoint, as if the power were in the people; whereas it was certainly in the apostles: whom we may appoint over this business, to take care of it, and to see that there be neither waste nor want.
(3.) The apostles engage to addict
themselves wholly to their work as ministers, and the more closely
if they can but get fairly quit of this troublesome office
(
2. How this proposal was agreed to, and
presently put in execution, by the disciples. It was not imposed
upon them by an absolute power, though they might have been bold in
Christ to do this (
(1.) They pitched upon the persons. It is
not probable that they all cast their eye upon the same men.
Everyone had his friend, whom he thought well of. But the majority
of votes fell upon the persons here named; and the rest both of the
candidates and the electors acquiesced, and made no disturbance, as
the members of societies in such cases ought to do. An apostle, who
was an extraordinary officer, was chosen by lot, which is more
immediately the act of God; but the overseers of the poor were
chosen by the suffrage of the people, in which yet a regard is to
be had to the providence of God, who has all men's hearts and
tongues in his hand. We have a list of the persons chosen. Some
think they were such as were before of the seventy disciples; but
this is not likely, for they were ordained by Christ himself, long
since, to preach the gospel; and there was not more reason
that they should leave the word of God to serve tables than that
the apostles should. It is therefore more probable that they were
of those that were converted since the pouring out of the Spirit;
for it was promised to all that would be baptized that they should
receive the gift of the Holy Ghost; and the gift, according
to that promise, is that fulness of the Holy Ghost which was
required in those that were to be chosen to this service. We may
further conjecture, concerning these seven, [1.] That they were
such as had sold their estates, and brought the money into the
common stock; for cæteris paribus—other things being equal,
those were fittest to be entrusted with the distribution of it who
had been most generous in the contribution to it. [2.] That these
seven were all of the Grecian or Hellenist Jews, for they have all
Greek names, and this would be most likely to silence the
murmurings of the Grecians (which occasioned this institution),
to have the trust lodged in those that were foreigners, like
themselves, who would be sure not to neglect them. Nicolas,
it is plain, was one of them, for he was a proselyte of
Antioch; and some think the manner of expression intimates that
they were all proselytes of Jerusalem, as he was of Antioch. The
first named is Stephen, the glory of these septemviri, a
man full of faith and of the Holy Ghost; he had a strong faith
in the doctrine of Christ, and was full of it above most; full
of fidelity, full of courage (so some), for he was full of
the Holy Ghost, of his gifts and graces. He was an
extraordinary man, and excelled in every thing that was good; his
name signifies a crown. Phillip is put next, because he,
having used this office of a deacon well, thereby obtained a
good degree, and was afterwards ordained to the office of an
evangelist, a companion and assistant to the apostles, for so he is
expressly called,
(2.) The apostles appointed them to this
work of serving tables for the present,
III. The advancement of the church
hereupon. When things were thus put into good order in the church
(grievances were redressed and discontents silenced) then religion
got ground,
8 And Stephen, full of faith and power, did great wonders and miracles among the people. 9 Then there arose certain of the synagogue, which is called the synagogue of the Libertines, and Cyrenians, and Alexandrians, and of them of Cilicia and of Asia, disputing with Stephen. 10 And they were not able to resist the wisdom and the spirit by which he spake. 11 Then they suborned men, which said, We have heard him speak blasphemous words against Moses, and against God. 12 And they stirred up the people, and the elders, and the scribes, and came upon him, and caught him, and brought him to the council, 13 And set up false witnesses, which said, This man ceaseth not to speak blasphemous words against this holy place, and the law: 14 For we have heard him say, that this Jesus of Nazareth shall destroy this place, and shall change the customs which Moses delivered us. 15 And all that sat in the council, looking stedfastly on him, saw his face as it had been the face of an angel.
Stephen, no doubt was diligent and faithful in the discharge of his office as distributor of the church's charity, and laid out himself to put that affair in a good method, which he did to universal satisfaction; and though it appears here that he was a man of uncommon gifts, and fitted for a higher station, yet, being called to that office, he did not think it below him to do the duty of it. And, being faithful in a little, he was entrusted with more; and, though we do not find him propagating the gospel by preaching and baptizing, yet we find him here called out to very honourable services, and owned in them.
I. He proved the truth of the gospel, by
working miracles in Christ's name,
II. He pleaded the cause of Christianity
against those that opposed it, and argued against it (
1. We are here told who were his opponents,
2. We are here told how he carried the
point in this dispute (
III. At length, he sealed it with his blood; so we shall find he did in the next chapter; here we have some steps taken by his enemies towards it. When they could not answer his arguments as a disputant, they prosecuted him as a criminal, and suborned witnesses against him, to swear blasphemy upon him. "On such terms (saith Mr. Baxter here) do we dispute with malignant men. And it is next to a miracle of providence that no greater number of religious persons have been murdered in the world, by the way of perjury and pretence of law, when so many thousands hate them who make no conscience of false oaths." They suborned men, that is, instructed them what to say, and then hired them to swear it. They were the more enraged against him because he had proved them to be in the wrong, and shown them the right way; for which they ought to have given him their best thanks. Was he therefore become their enemy, because he told them the truth, and proved it to be so? Now let us observe here,
1. How with all possible art and industry
they incensed both the government and the mob against him, that, if
they could not prevail by the one, they might by the other
(
2. How they got him to the bar: They came upon him, when he little thought of it, and caught him and brought him to the council. They came upon him in a body, and flew upon him as a lion upon his prey; so the word signifies. By their rude and violent treatment of him, they would represent him, both to the people, and to the government, as a dangerous man, that would either flee from justice if he were not watched, or fight with it if he were not put under a force. Having caught him, they brought him triumphantly into the council, and, as it should seem, so hastily that he had none of his friends with him. They had found, when they brought many together, that they emboldened one another, and strengthened one another's hands; and therefore they will try how to deal with them singly.
3. How they were prepared with evidence
ready to produce against him. They were resolved that they would
not be run a-ground, as they were when they brought our Saviour
upon his trial, and then had to seek for witnesses. These were got
ready beforehand, and were instructed to make oath that they had
heard him speak blasphemous words against Moses and against
God (
(1.) What was the general charge exhibited against him—that he spoke blasphemous words; and, to aggravate the matter, "He ceases not to speak blasphemous words; it is his common talk, his discourse in all companies; wheresoever he comes, he makes it his business to instil his notions into all he converses with." It intimates likewise something of contumacy and contempt of admonition. "He has been warned against it, and yet ceases not to talk at this rate." Blasphemy is justly reckoned a heinous crime (to speak contemptibly and reproachfully of God our Maker), and therefore Stephen's persecutors would be thought to have a deep concern upon them for the honour of God's name, and to do this in a jealousy for that. As it was with the confessors and martyrs of the Old Testament, so it was with those of the New—their brethren that hated them, and cast them out, said, Let the Lord be glorified; and pretended they did him service in it. He is said to have spoken blasphemous words against Moses and against God. Thus far they were right, that those who blaspheme Moses (if they meant the writings of Moses, which were given by inspiration of God) blaspheme God himself. Those that speak reproachfully of the scriptures, and ridicule them, reflect upon God himself, and do despite to him. His great intention is to magnify the law and make it honourable; those therefore that vilify the law, and make it contemptible, blaspheme his name; for he has magnified his word above all his name. But did Stephen blaspheme Moses? By no means, he was far from it. Christ, and the preachers of his gospel, never said any thing that looked like blaspheming Moses; they always quoted his writings with respect, appealed to them, and said no other things than what Moses said should come; very unjustly therefore is Stephen indicted for blaspheming Moses. But,
(2.) Let us see how this charge is
supported and made out; why, truly, when the thing was to be
proved, all they can charge him with is that he hath spoken
blasphemous words against this holy place and the law; and this
must be deemed and taken as blasphemy against Moses and against God
himself. Thus does the charge dwindle when it comes to the
evidence. [1.] He is charged with blaspheming this holy
place. Some understand this of the city of Jerusalem, which was
the holy city, and which they had a mighty jealousy for. But it is
rather meant of the temple, that holy house. Christ was condemned
as a blasphemer for words which were thought to reflect upon the
temple, which they seemed concerned for the honour of, even when
they by their wickedness had profaned it. [2.] He is charged with
blaspheming the law, of which they made their boast,
and in which they put their trust, when through breaking the law
they dishonoured God,
IV. We are here told how God owned him when
he was brought before the council, and made it to appear that he
stood by him (