5 lines
9.7 KiB
HTML
5 lines
9.7 KiB
HTML
|
<p>It was before appointed that the priests should teach the people the statutes God had given concerning the <i>difference between clean and unclean</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Lev.10.10,Lev.10.11" href="/passage/?search=Lev.10.10,Lev.10.11"><span class="bibleref" title="Lev.10.10">Lev. 10:10</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Lev.10.11">11</span></a>. Now here it is provided that they should themselves observe what they were to teach the people. Note, Those whose office it is to instruct must do it by example as well as precept, <a class="bibleref" title="1Tim.4.12" href="/passage/?search=1Tim.4.12">1 Tim. 4:12</a>. The priests were to draw nearer to God than any of the people, and to be more intimately conversant with sacred things, and therefore it was required of them that they should keep at a greater distance than others from every thing that was defiling and might diminish the honour of their priesthood.</p>
|
|||
|
|
<p class="tab-1">I. They must take care not to disparage themselves in their mourning for the dead. All that mourned for the dead were supposed to come near the body, if not to touch it: and the Jews say, “It made a man ceremonially unclean to come within six feet of a dead corpse;” nay, it is declared (<a class="bibleref" title="Num.19.14" href="/passage/?search=Num.19.14">Num. 19:14</a>) that all who come into the tent where the dead body lies shall be unclean seven days. Therefore all the mourners that attended the funeral could not but defile themselves, so as not to be fit to come into the sanctuary for seven days: for this reason it is ordered, 1. That the priests should never put themselves under this incapacity of coming into the sanctuary, unless it were for one of their nearest relations, <a class="bibleref" title="Lev.21.1-Lev.21.3" href="/passage/?search=Lev.21.1-Lev.21.3">Lev. 21:1-3</a>. A priest was permitted to do it for a parent or a child, for a brother or an unmarried sister, and therefore, no doubt (though this is not mentioned) for the wife of his bosom; for Ezekiel, a priest, would have mourned for his wife if he had not been particularly prohibited, <a class="bibleref" title="Ezek.24.17" href="/passage/?search=Ezek.24.17">Ezek. 24:17</a>. By this allowance God put an honour upon natural affection, and favoured it so far as to dispense with the attendance of his servants for seven days, while they indulged themselves in their sorrow for the death of their dear relations; but, beyond this period, weeping must not hinder sowing, nor their affection to their relations take them off from the service of the sanctuary. Nor was it at all allowed for the death of any other, no, not of a <i>chief man among the people</i>, as some read it, <a class="bibleref" title="Lev.21.4" href="/passage/?search=Lev.21.4">Lev. 21:4</a>. They must not defile themselves, no, nor for the high priest himself, unless thus akin to them. Though <i>there is a friend that is nearer than a brother</i>, yet the priests must not pay this respect to the best friend they had, except he were a relation, lest, if it were allowed for one, others should expect it, and so they should be frequently taken off from their work: and it is hereby intimated that there is a particular affection to be reserved for those that are thus near akin to us; and, when any such are removed by death, we ought to be affected with it, and lay it to heart, as the near approach of death to ourselves, and an alarm to us to prepare to follow. 2. That they must not be extravagant in the expressions of their mourning, no, not for their dearest relations, <a class="bibleref" title="Lev.21.5" href="/passage/?search=Lev.21.5">Lev. 21:5</a>. Their mourning must not be either, (1.) Superstitious, according to the manner of the heathen, who cut off their hair, and let out their blood, in honour of the imaginary deities which presided (as they thought) in the congregation of the dead, that they might engage them to be propitious to their departed friends. Even the superstitious rites used of old at funerals are an indication of the ancient belief of the immortality of the soul, and its existence in a separate state: and though the rites themselves were forbidden by the divine law, because they were performed to false gods, yet the decent respect which nature teaches and which the law allows to be paid to the remains of our deceased friends, shows that we are not to look upon them as lost. Nor, (2.) Must it be passionate or immoderate. Note, God’s ministers must be examples to others of patience under affliction, particularly that which touches in a very tender part, the death of their near relations. They are supposed to know more than others of the reasons why we must <i>not sorrow as those that have no hope</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="1Thess.4.13" href="/passage/?search=1Thess.4.13">1 Thess. 4:13</a>), and therefore they ought to be eminently calm and composed, that they may be able to comfort others with the same comforts wherewith they are themselves comforted
|
|||
|
|
<p class="tab-1">II. They must take care not to degrade themselves in their marriage, <a class="bibleref" title="Lev.21.7" href="/passage/?search=Lev.21.7">Lev. 21:7</a>. A priest must not marry a woman of ill fame, that either had been guilty or was suspected to have been guilty of uncleanness. He must not only not marry a harlot, though ever so great a penitent for her former whoredoms, but he must not marry one that was profane, that is, of a light carriage or indecent behaviour. Nay, he must not marry one that was divorced, because there was reason to think it was for some fault she was divorced. The priests were forbidden to undervalue themselves by such marriages as these, which were allowed to others, 1. Lest it should bring a present reproach upon their ministry, harden the profane in their profaneness, and grieve the hearts of serious people: the New Testament gives laws to ministers’ wives (<a class="bibleref" title="1Tim.3.11" href="/passage/?search=1Tim.3.11">1 Tim. 3:11</a>), that they be <i>grave and sober</i>, that <i>the ministry be not blamed</i>. 2. Lest it should entail a reproach upon their families; for the work and honour of the priesthood were to descend as an inheritance to their children after them. Those do not consult the good of their posterity as they ought who do not take care to marry such as are of good report and character. He that would seek <i>a godly seed</i> (as the expression is, <a class="bibleref" title="Mal.2.15" href="/passage/?search=Mal.2.15">Mal. 2:15</a>) must first seek a godly wife, and take heed of a corruption of blood. It is added here (<a class="bibleref" title="Lev.21.8" href="/passage/?search=Lev.21.8">Lev. 21:8</a>), <i>Thou shalt sanctify him</i>, and <i>he shall be holy unto thee</i>. “Not only thou, O Moses, by taking care that these laws be observed, but thou, O Israel, by all endeavours possible to keep up the reputation of the priesthood, which the priests themselves must do nothing to expose or forfeit. <i>He is holy to his God</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="Lev.21.7" href="/passage/?search=Lev.21.7">Lev. 21:7</a>), therefore <i>he shall be holy unto thee</i>.” Note, We must honour those whom our God puts honour upon. Gospel ministers by this rule are to be <i>esteemed very highly in love for their works’ sake</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="1Thess.5.13" href="/passage/?search=1Thess.5.13">1 Thess. 5:13</a>), and every Christian must look upon himself as concerned to be the guardian of their honour.</p>
|
|||
|
|
<p class="tab-1">III. Their children must be afraid of doing any thing to disparage them (<a class="bibleref" title="Lev.21.9" href="/passage/?search=Lev.21.9">Lev. 21:9</a>): <i>If the daughter of any priest play the whore</i>, her crime is great; she not only polluteth but <i>profaneth herself</i>: other women have not that honour to lose that she has, who, as one of a priest’s family, has eaten of the holy things, and is supposed to have been better educated than others. Nay, <i>she profaneth her father</i>; he is reflected upon, and every body will be ready to ask, “Why did not he teach her better?” And the sinners in Zion will insult and say, “Here is your priest’s daughter.” Her punishment there must be peculiar: <i>She shall be burnt with fire</i>, for a terror to all priests’ daughters. Note, The children of ministers ought, of all others, to take heed of doing any thing that is scandalous, because in them it is doubly scandalous, and will be punished accordingly by him whose name is <i>Jealous</i>.</p>
|