mh_parser/scraps/John_8_51-John_8_59.html

<p>In these verses we have,</p>
<p class="tab-1">I. The doctrine of the immortality of believers laid down, <a class="bibleref" title="John.8.51" href="/passage/?search=John.8.51">John 8:51</a>. It is ushered in with the usual solemn preface, <i>Verily, verily, I say unto you</i>, which commands both attention and assent, and this is what he says, <i>If a man keep my sayings, he shall never see death</i>. Here we have, 1. The <i>character</i> of a believer: he is one that <i>keeps the sayings</i> of the Lord Jesus, <b><i>ton logon ton emon</i></b>—<i>my word</i>; that <i>word of mine</i> which I have delivered to you; this we must not only <i>receive</i>, but <i>keep</i>; not only <i>have</i>, but <i>hold</i>. We must keep it in mind and memory, keep it in love and affection, so keep it as in nothing to violate it or go contrary to it, keep it <i>without spot</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="1Tim.6.14" href="/passage/?search=1Tim.6.14">1 Tim. 6:14</a>), keep it as a trust committed to us, keep in it as our way, keep to it as our rule. 2. The <i>privilege</i> of a believer: <i>He shall by no means see death for ever</i>; so it is in the original. Not as if the bodies of believers were secured from the stroke of death. No, even the <i>children of the Most High</i> must <i>die like men</i>, and the followers of Christ have been, more than other men, in deaths often, and <i>killed all the day long</i>; how then is this promise made good that they <i>shall not see death</i>? Answer, (1.) The property of death is so altered to them that they do not see it as death, they do not see the terror of death, it is quite taken off; their sight does not <i>terminate</i> in death, as theirs does who <i>live by sense</i>; no, they look so clearly, so comfortably, through death, and beyond death, and are so taken up with their state on the other side death, that they overlook death, and <i>see it not</i>. (2.) The power of death is so broken that though there is no remedy, but they must see <i>death</i>, yet they shall not see death <i>for ever</i>, shall not be always shut up under its arrests, the day will come when <i>death shall be swallowed up in victory</i>. (3.) They are perfectly delivered from <i>eternal death</i>, shall not be <i>hurt of the second death</i>. That is the death especially meant here, that death which is <i>for ever</i>, which is opposed to everlasting life; this they shall never see, for they shall <i>never come into condemnation</i>; they shall have their everlasting lot where there will be <i>no more death</i>, where they <i>cannot die any more</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Luke.20.36" href="/passage/?search=Luke.20.36">Luke 20:36</a>. Though now they cannot avoid seeing death, and tasting it too, yet they shall shortly be there where it will be <i>seen no more for ever</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Exod.14.13" href="/passage/?search=Exod.14.13">Exod. 14:13</a>.</p>
<p class="tab-1">II. The Jews cavil at this doctrine. Instead of laying hold of this precious promise of immortality, which the nature of man has an ambition of (who is there that does not love life, and dread the sight of death?) they lay hold of this occasion to reproach him that makes them so kind an offer: <i>Now we know that thou hast a devil</i>. Abraham <i>is dead</i>. Observe here,</p>
<p class="tab-1">1. Their <i>railing: “Now we know that thou hast a devil</i>, that thou art a madman; thou ravest, and sayest thou knowest not what.” See how these swine trample underfoot the precious pearls of gospel promises. If now at last they had evidence to prove him <i>mad</i>, why did they say (<a class="bibleref" title="John.8.48" href="/passage/?search=John.8.48">John 8:48</a>), before they had that proof, <i>Thou hast a devil</i>? But this is the method of malice, first to <i>fasten</i> an invidious charge, and then to <i>fish</i> for evidence of it: <i>Now we know that thou hast a devil</i>. If he had not abundantly proved himself a <i>teacher come from God</i>, his promises of immortality to his credulous followers might justly have been ridiculed, and charity itself would have imputed them to a crazed fancy; but his doctrine was evidently divine, his miracles confirmed it, and the Jews’ religion taught them to expect such a prophet, and to believe in him; for them therefore thus to reject him was to abandon that promise to which their <i>twelve tribes hoped to come</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Acts.26.27" href="/passage/?search=Acts.26.27">Acts 26:27</a>.</p>
<p class="tab-1">2. Their <i>reasoning</i>, and the colour they had to <i>run him down</i> thus. In short, they look upon him as guilty of an insufferable piece of arrogance, in making himself greater than <i>Abraham and the prophets: Abraham is dead</i>, and <i>the prophets</i>, they are dead too; very true, by the same token that these Jews were the genuine offspring of those that killed them. Now, (1.) It is true that Abraham and the prophets were great men, great in the favour of God, and great in the esteem of all good men. (2.) It is true that they <i>kept God’s sayings</i>, and were obedient to them; and yet, (3.) It is true that they <i>died</i>; they never pretended to <i>have</i>, much less to <i>give</i>, immortality, but every one in his own order was <i>gathered to his people</i>. It was their honour that they <i>died in faith</i>, but die they must. Why should a good man be afraid to die, when Abraham is dead, and the prophets are dead? They have <i>tracked</i> the way through that darksome valley, which should reconcile us to death and help to take off the terror of it. Now they think Christ talks madly, when he saith, <i>If a man keep my sayings, he shall never taste death. Tasting</i> death means the same thing with <i>seeing</i> it; and well may death be represented as grievous to <i>several</i> of the senses, which is the destruction of them <i>all</i>. Now their arguing goes upon two mistakes:—[1.] They understood Christ of an immortality in this world, and this was a mistake. In the sense that Christ spoke, it was not true that <i>Abraham and the prophets were dead</i>, for God is still the <i>God of Abraham</i> and the <i>God of the holy prophets</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="Rev.22.6" href="/passage/?search=Rev.22.6">Rev. 22:6</a>); now God is not the God of the dead, but of the living; therefore Abraham and the prophets are still alive, and, as Christ meant it, they had not <i>seen</i> nor <i>tasted</i> death. [2.] They thought none could be greater than Abraham and the prophets, whereas they could not but know that the Messiah would be greater than Abraham or any of the prophets; they did virtuously, but he excelled them all; nay, they borrowed their greatness from him. It was the honour of Abraham that he was the Father of the Messiah, and the honour of the prophets that they testified beforehand concerning him: so that he certainly <i>obtained a</i> far <i>more excellent name than they</i>. Therefore, instead of inferring from Christ’s making himself greater than Abraham that he had a <i>devil</i>, they should have inferred from his proving himself so (by doing the works which neither Abraham nor the prophets ever did) that he was the Christ; but their eyes were blinded. They scornfully asked, <i>Whom makest thou thyself</i>? As if he had been guilty of pride and vain-glory; whereas he was so far from making himself greater than he was that he now drew a veil over his own glory, emptied himself, and made himself less than he was, and was the greatest example of humility that ever was.</p>
<p class="tab-1">III. Christ’s reply to this cavil; still he vouchsafes to reason with them, that every mouth may be stopped. No doubt he could have struck them dumb or dead upon the spot, but this was the <i>day of his patience</i>.</p>
<p class="tab-1">1. In his answer he insists not upon his own testimony concerning himself, but waives it as not sufficient nor conclusive (<a class="bibleref" title="John.8.54" href="/passage/?search=John.8.54">John 8:54</a>): <i>If I honour myself, my honour is nothing</i>, <b><i>ean ego doxazo</i></b>—<i>if I glorify myself</i>. Note, Self-honour is no honour; and the affectation of glory is both the forfeiture and the defeasance of it: it is <i>not glory</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="Prov.25.27" href="/passage/?search=Prov.25.27">Prov. 25:27</a>), but so great a reproach that there is no sin which men are more industrious to hide than this; even he that most affects praise would not be thought to do it. Honour of our own creating is a mere chimera, has nothing in it, and therefore is called <i>vain-glory</i>. Self-admirers are self-<i>deceivers</i>. Our Lord Jesus was not one that <i>honoured himself</i>, as they represented him; he was <i>crowned</i> by him who is the fountain of honour, and glorified not himself to be made a high priest, <a class="bibleref" title="Heb.5.4,Heb.5.5" href="/passage/?search=Heb.5.4,Heb.5.5"><span class="bibleref" title="Heb.5.4">Heb. 5:4</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Heb.5.5">5</span></a>.</p>
<p class="tab-1">2. He refers himself to <i>his</i> Father, God; and to <i>their</i> father, Abraham.</p>
<p class="tab-1">(1.) To his Father, <i>God: It is my Father that honoureth me</i>. By this he means, [1.] That he <i>derived</i> from his Father all the honour he now claimed; he had commanded them to believe in him, to follow him, and to keep his word, all which put an honour upon him; but it was the Father that <i>laid help</i> upon him, that <i>lodged</i> all <i>fulness</i> in him, that sanctified him, and sealed him, and sent him into the world to receive all the honours due to the Messiah, and this justified him in all these demands of respect. [2.] That he <i>depended</i> upon his Father for all the honour he further <i>looked for</i>. He courted not the applauses of the age, but despised them; for his eye and heart were upon the glory which the Father had promised him, and <i>which he had with the Father before the world was</i>. He aimed at an advancement with which the Father was to <i>exalt him, a name</i> he was to <i>give him</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Phil.2.8,Phil.2.9" href="/passage/?search=Phil.2.8,Phil.2.9"><span class="bibleref" title="Phil.2.8">Phil. 2:8</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Phil.2.9">9</span></a>. Note, Christ and all that are his depend upon God for their honour; and he that is sure of honour where he is known cares not though he be slighted where he is in disguise. Appealing thus often to his Father, and his Father’s testimony of him, which yet the Jews did not admit nor give credit to,</p>
<p class="tab-1"><i>First</i>, He here takes occasion to show the reason of <i>their</i> incredulity, notwithstanding <i>this</i> testimony—and this was their <i>unacquaintedness</i> with God; as if he had said, “But why should I talk to you of my Father’s honouring me, when he is one you know nothing of? You <i>say of him that he is your God, yet you have not known him</i>.” Here observe,</p>
<p class="tab-1"><i>a</i>. The profession they made of relation to God: “<i>You say that he is your God</i>, the God you have chosen, and are in covenant with; you say that you are Israel; but all are not so indeed that are of Israel,” <a class="bibleref" title="Rom.9.6" href="/passage/?search=Rom.9.6">Rom. 9:6</a>. Note, Many pretend to have an interest in God, and say that he is <i>theirs</i>, who yet have no just cause to say so. Those who called themselves the <i>temple of the Lord</i>, having <i>profaned the excellency of Jacob</i>, did but trust in lying words. What will it avail us to say, He is <i>our God</i>, if we be not in sincerity <i>his people</i>, nor such as he will own? Christ mentions here their profession of relation to God, as that which was an aggravation of their unbelief. All people will honour those whom their God honours; but these Jews, who said that the Lord was their God, studied how to put the utmost disgrace upon one upon whom their God put honour. Note, The Profession we make of a covenant relation to God, and an interest in him, if it be not improved <i>by us</i> will be improved <i>against us</i>.</p>
<p class="tab-1"><i>b</i>. Their ignorance of him, and estrangement from him, notwithstanding this profession: <i>Yet you have not known him</i>. (<i>a</i>.) <i>You know him not at all</i>. These Pharisees were so taken up with the study of their traditions concerning things foreign and trifling that they never minded the most needful and useful knowledge; like the false prophets of old, who <i>caused people to forget God’s name by their dreams</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Jer.23.27" href="/passage/?search=Jer.23.27">Jer. 23:27</a>. Or, (<i>b</i>.) <i>You know him not aright</i>, but mistake concerning him; and this is as bad as not knowing him at all, or worse. Men may be able to dispute subtly concerning God, and yet may think him such a one as themselves, and <i>not know him</i>. You say that he is <i>yours</i>, and it is natural to us to desire to know <i>our own</i>, yet you <i>know him not</i>. Note, There are many who <i>claim-kindred</i> to God who yet have no acquaintance with him. It is only the name of God which they have learned to talk of, and to hector with; but for the nature of God, his attributes and perfections, and relations to his creatures, they know nothing of the matter; we <i>speak this to their shame</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="1Cor.15.34" href="/passage/?search=1Cor.15.34">1 Cor. 15:34</a>. Multitudes satisfy themselves, but deceive themselves, with a titular relation to an <i>unknown God</i>. This Christ charges upon the Jews here, [<i>a</i>.] To show how vain and groundless their pretensions of relation to God were. “You say that he is yours, but you give yourselves the lie, for it is plain that you do not know him;” and we reckon that a cheat is effectually convicted if it be found that he is ignorant of the persons he pretends alliance to. [<i>b</i>.] To show the true reason why they were not wrought upon by Christ’s doctrine and miracles. They knew not God; and therefore perceived not the image of God, nor the voice of God in Christ. Note, The reason why men receive not the <i>gospel of Christ</i> is because they have not the <i>knowledge of God</i>. Men <i>submit not to the righteousness of Christ</i> because they are <i>ignorant of God’s righteousness</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Rom.10.3" href="/passage/?search=Rom.10.3">Rom. 10:3</a>. They that know not God, and obey not the gospel of Christ, are put together, <a class="bibleref" title="2Thess.1.8" href="/passage/?search=2Thess.1.8">2 Thess. 1:8</a>.</p>
<p class="tab-1"><i>Secondly</i>, He gives them the reason of <i>his</i> assurance that his Father would <i>honour</i> him and <i>own him: But I know him</i>; and again, <i>I know him</i>; which bespeaks, not only his <i>acquaintance</i> with him, having lain in his bosom, but his <i>confidence</i> in him, to stand by him, and bear him out in his whole undertaking; as was prophesied concerning him (<a class="bibleref" title="Isa.50.7,Isa.50.8" href="/passage/?search=Isa.50.7,Isa.50.8"><span class="bibleref" title="Isa.50.7">Isa. 50:7</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Isa.50.8">8</span></a>), <i>I know</i> that I shall not be ashamed, for he is near that justifies; and as Paul, “<i>I know whom I have believed</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="2Tim.1.12" href="/passage/?search=2Tim.1.12">2 Tim. 1:12</a>), I know him to be faithful, and powerful, and heartily engaged in the cause which I know to be his <i>own</i>.” Observe, 1. How he <i>professes</i> his knowledge of his Father, with the greatest certainty, as one that was neither afraid nor ashamed to own it: <i>If I should say I know him not, I should be a liar like unto you</i>. He would not deny his relation to God, to humour the Jews, and to avoid their reproaches, and prevent further trouble; nor would he retract what he had said, nor confess himself either deceived or a deceiver; if he should, he would be found a false witness against God and himself. Note, Those who disown their religion and relation to God, as Peter, are liars, as much as hypocrites are, who pretend to know him, when they do not. See <a class="bibleref" title="1Tim.6.13,1Tim.6.14" href="/passage/?search=1Tim.6.13,1Tim.6.14"><span class="bibleref" title="1Tim.6.13">1 Tim. 6:13</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="1Tim.6.14">14</span></a>. Mr. Clark observes well, upon this, that it is a great sin to deny God’s grace in us. 2. How he <i>proves</i> his knowledge of his Father: <i>I know him and keep his sayings</i>, or <i>his word</i>. Christ, as man, was obedient to the moral law, and, as Redeemer, to the mediatorial law; and in both he kept <i>his Father’s</i> word, and <i>his own word</i> with the Father. Christ requires of us (<a class="bibleref" title="John.8.51" href="/passage/?search=John.8.51">John 8:51</a>) that we <i>keep his sayings</i>; and he has set before us a copy of obedience, a copy without a blot: he <i>kept his Father’s sayings</i>; well might he who <i>learned obedience</i> teach it; see <a class="bibleref" title="Heb.5.8,Heb.5.9" href="/passage/?search=Heb.5.8,Heb.5.9"><span class="bibleref" title="Heb.5.8">Heb. 5:8</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Heb.5.9">9</span></a>. Christ by this evinced that he knew the Father. Note, The best proof of our acquaintance with God is our obedience to him. Those only know God aright that keep his word; it is a ruled case, <a class="bibleref" title="1John.2.3" href="/passage/?search=1John.2.3">1 John 2:3</a>. <i>Hereby we know that we know him</i> (and do not only fancy it), <i>if we keep his commandments</i>.</p>
<p class="tab-1">(2.) Christ refers them to <i>their</i> father, whom they boasted so much of a relation to, and that was Abraham, and this closes the discourse.</p>
<p class="tab-1">[1.] Christ asserts Abraham’s prospect of him, and respect to him: <i>Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day, and he saw it, and was glad</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="John.8.56" href="/passage/?search=John.8.56">John 8:56</a>. And by this he proves that he was not at all out of the way when he <i>made himself greater than Abraham</i>. Two things he here speaks of as instances of that patriarch’s respect to the promised Messiah:—</p>
<p class="tab-1"><i>First</i>, The ambition he had to <i>see his day: He rejoiced</i>, <b><i>egalliasto</i></b>—<i>he leaped at it</i>. The word, though it commonly signifies <i>rejoicing</i>, must here signify a transport of <i>desire</i> rather than of <i>joy</i>, for otherwise the latter part of <a class="bibleref" title="John.8.56" href="/passage/?search=John.8.56">John 8:56</a> would be a tautology; he <i>saw it, and was glad</i>. He <i>reached out</i>, or <i>stretched himself forth</i>, that he might <i>see my day</i>; as Zaccheus, that ran before, and climbed the tree, <i>to see Jesus</i>. The notices he had received of the Messiah to come had raised in him an expectation of something <i>great</i>, which he earnestly longed to know more of. The dark intimation of that which is considerable puts men upon enquiry, and makes them earnestly ask <i>Who</i>? and <i>What</i>? and <i>Where</i>? and <i>When</i>? and <i>How</i>? And thus the prophets of the Old Testament, having a general idea of a grace that should <i>come, searched diligently</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="1Pet.1.10" href="/passage/?search=1Pet.1.10">1 Pet. 1:10</a>), and Abraham was as industrious herein as any of them. God told him of a land that he would give his posterity, and of the wealth and honour he designed them (<a class="bibleref" title="Gen.15.14" href="/passage/?search=Gen.15.14">Gen. 15:14</a>); but he never <i>leaped</i> thus to see that day, as he did to see the day of the Son of man. He could not look with so much indifferency upon the promised <i>seed</i> as he did upon the promised land; <i>in that</i> he was, but <i>to the other</i> he could not be, contentedly a stranger. Note, Those who rightly know any thing of Christ cannot but be earnestly desirous to know more of him. Those who discern the dawning of the light of the Sun of righteousness cannot but wish to see his rising. The mystery of redemption is that which <i>angels desire to look into</i>, much more should we, who are more immediately concerned in it. Abraham desired to see Christ’s day, though it was at a great distance; but this degenerate seed of his discerned not his day, nor bade it welcome when it came. The appearing of Christ, which gracious souls love and long for, carnal hearts dread and loathe.</p>
<p class="tab-1"><i>Secondly</i>, The satisfaction he had in what he did see of it: <i>He saw it, and was glad</i>. Observe here,</p>
<p class="tab-1"><i>a</i>. How God gratified the pious desire of Abraham; he longed to see Christ’s day, and he <i>saw it</i>. Though he saw it not so plainly, and fully, and distinctly as we now see it under the gospel, yet he saw something of it, more <i>afterwards</i> than he did at first. Note, To him that has, and to him that asks, shall be given; to him that uses and improves what he has, and that desires and prays for more of the knowledge of Christ, God will give more. But how did Abraham see Christ’s day? (<i>a</i>.) Some understand it of the sight he had of it in the other world. The separate soul of Abraham, when the veil of flesh was rent, saw the mysteries of the kingdom of God in heaven. Calvin mentions this sense of it, and does not much disallow it. Note, The longings of gracious souls after Jesus Christ will be fully satisfied when they come to heaven, and not till then. But, (<i>b</i>.) It is more commonly understood of some sight he had of <i>Christ’s day</i> in this world. They that <i>received not the promises</i>, yet <i>saw them afar off</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Heb.11.13" href="/passage/?search=Heb.11.13">Heb. 11:13</a>. Balaam saw Christ, but not <i>now</i>, not <i>nigh</i>. There is room to conjecture that Abraham had some vision of Christ and his day, for his own private satisfaction, which is not, nor must be, recorded in his story, like that of Daniel’s, which must be <i>shut up, and sealed unto the time of the end</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Dan.12.4" href="/passage/?search=Dan.12.4">Dan. 12:4</a>. Christ knew what Abraham saw better than Moses did. But there are divers things recorded in which Abraham saw more of that which he longed to see than he did when the promise was first made to him. He saw in Melchizedek one <i>made like unto the Son of God</i>, and a priest for ever; he saw an appearance of Jehovah, attended with two angels, in the plains of Mamre. In the prevalency of his intercession for Sodom he saw a specimen of Christ’s intercession; in the casting out of Ishmael, and the establishment of the covenant with Isaac, he saw a figure of the gospel day, which is Christ’s day; for these things were an allegory. In offering Isaac, and the ram instead of Isaac, he saw a double type of the great sacrifice; and his calling the place <i>Jehovah-jireh—It shall be seen</i>, intimates that he saw something more in it than others did, which time would produce; and in making his servant <i>put his hand under his thigh</i>, when he swore, he had a regard to the Messiah.</p>
<p class="tab-1"><i>b</i>. How <i>Abraham</i> entertained these discoveries of Christ’s day, and bade them welcome: <i>He saw, and was glad</i>. He was glad of what he <i>saw</i> of God’s favour to himself, and glad of what he <i>foresaw</i> of the mercy God had in store for the world. Perhaps this refers to Abraham’s laughing when God assured him of a son by Sarah (<a class="bibleref" title="Gen.17.16,Gen.17.17" href="/passage/?search=Gen.17.16,Gen.17.17"><span class="bibleref" title="Gen.17.16">Gen. 17:16</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Gen.17.17">17</span></a>), for that was not a laughter of distrust as Sarah’s but of joy; in that promise he saw Christ’s day, and it <i>filled him with joy unspeakable</i>. Thus he embraced the promises. Note, A believing sight of Christ and his day will put gladness into the heart. No joy like the joy of faith; we are never acquainted with true pleasure till we are acquainted with Christ.</p>
<p class="tab-1">[2.] The Jews cavil at this, and reproach him for it (<a class="bibleref" title="John.8.57" href="/passage/?search=John.8.57">John 8:57</a>): <i>Thou art not yet fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham</i>? Here, <i>First</i>, They suppose that if Abraham saw him and his day he also had seen Abraham, which yet was not a necessary <i>innuendo</i>, but this turn of his words would best serve to expose him; yet it was true that Christ had seen Abraham, and had talked with him as a man talks with his friend. <i>Secondly</i>, They suppose it a very absurd thing for him to pretend to have seen Abraham, who was <i>dead</i> so many ages before he was born. The state of the dead is an <i>invisible</i> state; but here they ran upon the old mistake, understanding that corporally which Christ spoke spiritually. Now this gave them occasion to <i>despise his youth</i>, and to upbraid him with it, as if he were <i>but of yesterday, and knew</i> nothing: <i>Thou art not yet fifty years old</i>. They might as well have said, <i>Thou art not forty</i>; for he was now but thirty-two or thirty-three years old. As to this, Irenaeus, one of the first fathers, with this passage supports the tradition which he says he had from some that had conversed with St. John, that our Saviour lived to be fifty years old, which he contends for, <i>Advers. Haeres</i>. lib. 2, cap. 39, 40. See what little credit is to be given to tradition; and, as to this here, the Jews spoke <i>at random</i>; some year they would mention, and therefore pitched upon one that they thought he was far enough short of; he did not look to be forty, but they were sure he could not be fifty, much less contemporary with Abraham. Old age is reckoned to begin at fifty (<a class="bibleref" title="Num.4.47" href="/passage/?search=Num.4.47">Num. 4:47</a>), so that they meant no more than this, “Thou art not to be reckoned an old man; many of us are much thy seniors, and yet pretend not to have seen Abraham.” Some think that his countenance was so altered, with grief and watching, that, together with the gravity of his aspect, it made him look like a man of fifty years old: <i>his visage was so marred</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Isa.52.14" href="/passage/?search=Isa.52.14">Isa. 52:14</a>.</p>
<p class="tab-1">[3.] Our Saviour gives an effectual answer to this cavil, by a solemn assertion of his own seniority even to Abraham himself (<a class="bibleref" title="John.8.58" href="/passage/?search=John.8.58">John 8:58</a>): “<i>Verily, verily, I say unto you</i>; I do not only say it in private to my own disciples, who will be sure to say as I say, but <i>to you</i> my enemies and persecutors; I say it to your faces, take it how you will: <i>Before Abraham was, I am</i>;” <b><i>prin Abraam genesthai, ego eimi</i></b>, <i>Before Abraham was made or born, I am</i>. The change of the word is observable, and bespeaks Abraham a creature, and himself the Creator; well therefore might he make himself <i>greater</i> than Abraham. <i>Before Abraham he was, First</i>, As God. <i>I am</i>, is the name of God (<a class="bibleref" title="Exod.3.14" href="/passage/?search=Exod.3.14">Exod. 3:14</a>); it denotes his self-existence; he does not say, <i>I was</i>, but <i>I am</i>, for he is the first and the last, immutably the same (<a class="bibleref" title="Rev.1.8" href="/passage/?search=Rev.1.8">Rev. 1:8</a>); thus he was not only before Abraham, but before <i>all worlds</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="John.1.1,Prov.8.23" href="/passage/?search=John.1.1,Prov.8.23"><span class="bibleref" title="John.1.1">John 1:1</span>; <span class="bibleref" title="Prov.8.23">Prov. 8:23</span></a>. <i>Secondly</i>, As Mediator. He was the appointed Messiah, long before Abraham; the <i>Lamb slain from the foundation of the world</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="Rev.13.8" href="/passage/?search=Rev.13.8">Rev. 13:8</a>), the channel of conveyance of light, life, and love from God to man. This supposes his divine nature, that he is the same in himself from eternity (<a class="bibleref" title="Heb.13.8" href="/passage/?search=Heb.13.8">Heb. 13:8</a>), and that he is the same to man ever since the fall; he was made of God wisdom, righteousness, sanctification, and redemption, to Adam, and Abel, and Enoch, and Noah, and Shem, and all the patriarchs that lived and died by faith in him before Abraham was born. Abraham was the root of the Jewish nation, the rock out of which they were hewn. If Christ was before Abraham, his doctrine and religion were no novelty, but were, in the substance of them, prior to Judaism, and ought to take place of it.</p>
<p class="tab-1">[4.] This great word ended the dispute <i>abruptly</i>, and put a period to it: they could bear to hear no more from him, and he needed to say no more to them, having witnessed this good confession, which was sufficient to support all his claims. One would think that Christ’s discourse, in which shone so much both of grace and glory, should have captivated them all; but their inveterate prejudice against the holy spiritual doctrine and law of Christ, which were so contrary to their pride and worldliness, baffled all the methods of conviction. Now was fulfilled that prophecy (<a class="bibleref" title="Mal.3.1,Mal.3.2" href="/passage/?search=Mal.3.1,Mal.3.2"><span class="bibleref" title="Mal.3.1">Mal. 3:1</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Mal.3.2">2</span></a>), that when the messenger of the covenant should <i>come to his temple</i> they <i>would not abide the day of his coming</i>, because he would be <i>like a refiner’s fire</i>. Observe here,</p>
<p class="tab-1"><i>First</i>, How they were <i>enraged</i> at Christ for what he said: <i>They took up stones to cast at him</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="John.8.59" href="/passage/?search=John.8.59">John 8:59</a>. Perhaps they looked upon him as a blasphemer, and such were indeed to be stoned (<a class="bibleref" title="Lev.24.16" href="/passage/?search=Lev.24.16">Lev. 24:16</a>); but they must be first legally tried and convicted. Farewell justice and order if every man pretend to execute a law at his pleasure. Besides, they had said but just now that he was a distracted crack-brained man, and if so it was against all reason and equity to punish him as a malefactor for what he said. <i>They took up stones</i>. Dr. Lightfoot will tell you how they came to have stones so ready in the temple; they had workmen at this time repairing the temple, or making some additions, and the pieces of stone which they hewed off served for this purpose. See here the desperate power of sin and Satan in and over the children of disobedience. Who would think that ever there should be such wickedness as this in men, such an open and daring rebellion against one that undeniably proved himself to be the Son of God? Thus every one has a stone to throw at his holy religion, <a class="bibleref" title="Acts.28.22" href="/passage/?search=Acts.28.22">Acts 28:22</a>.</p>
<p class="tab-1"><i>Secondly</i>, How he made his <i>escape</i> out of their hands. 1. He <i>absconded</i>; Jesus <i>hid himself</i>; <b><i>ekrybe</i></b>—<i>he was hid</i>, either by the crowd of those that wished well to him, to shelter him (he that ought to have been upon a throne, high and lifted up, is content to be <i>lost in a crowd</i>); or perhaps he concealed himself behind some of the walls or pillars of the temple (<i>in the secret of his tabernacle he shall hide me</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Ps.27.5" href="/passage/?search=Ps.27.5">Ps. 27:5</a>); or by a divine power, casting a mist before their eyes, he made himself invisible to them. <i>When the wicked rise a man is hidden</i>, a wise and good man, <a class="bibleref" title="Prov.28.12,Prov.28.28" href="/passage/?search=Prov.28.12,Prov.28.28"><span class="bibleref" title="Prov.28.12">Prov. 28:12</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Prov.28.28">28</span></a>. Not that Christ was afraid or ashamed to stand by what he had said, but his <i>hour was not yet come</i>, and he would countenance the flight of his ministers and people in times of persecution, when they are called to it. The Lord hid Jeremiah and Baruch, <a class="bibleref" title="Jer.36.26" href="/passage/?search=Jer.36.26">Jer. 36:26</a>. 2. He <i>departed</i>, he <i>went out of the temple</i>, going <i>through the midst of them</i>, undiscovered, and <i>so passed by</i>. This was not a cowardly inglorious flight, nor such as argued either guilt or fear. It was foretold concerning him that he should not fail nor be discouraged, <a class="bibleref" title="Isa.42.4" href="/passage/?search=Isa.42.4">Isa. 42:4</a>. But, (1.) It was an instance of his power over his enemies, and that they could do no more against him than he gave them leave to do; by which it appears that when afterwards he was taken in their pits he <i>offered himself</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="John.10.18" href="/passage/?search=John.10.18">John 10:18</a>. They now thought they had made sure of him and yet he <i>passed through the midst</i> of them, either their eyes being blinded or their hands tied, and thus he left them to fume, like a lion <i>disappointed of his prey</i>. (2.) It was an instance of his prudent provision for his own safety, when he knew that his work was not done, nor his testimony finished; thus he gave an example to his own rule, <i>When they persecute you in one city flee to another</i>; nay, if occasion be, to a <i>wilderness</i>, for so Elijah did (<a class="bibleref" title="1Kgs.19.3,1Kgs.19.4" href="/passage/?search=1Kgs.19.3,1Kgs.19.4"><span class="bibleref" title="1Kgs.19.3">1 Kgs. 19:3</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="1Kgs.19.4">4</span></a>), and the woman, the church, <a class="bibleref" title="Rev.12.6" href="/passage/?search=Rev.12.6">Rev. 12:6</a>. When they took up loose stones to throw at Christ, he could have commanded the fixed stones, which did <i>cry out of the wall</i> against them, to avenge his cause, or the earth to open and swallow them up; but he chose to accommodate himself to the state he was in, to make the example imitable by the prudence of his followers, without a miracle. (3.) It was a righteous deserting of those who (worse than the Gadarenes, who <i>prayed him to depart</i>) stoned him from among them. Christ will not long stay with those who bid him be gone. Christ did again visit the temple after this; as one <i>loth to depart</i>, he <i>bade oft farewell</i>; but at last he abandoned it for ever, and left it <i>desolate</i>. Christ now <i>went through</i> the midst of the Jews, and none of them courted his stay, nor stirred up himself to take hold of him, but were even content to let him go. Note, God never forsakes any till they have first provoked him to withdraw, and will have none of him. Calvin observes that these chief priests, when they had driven Christ out of the temple, valued themselves on the possession they kept of it: “But,” says he, “those deceive themselves who are proud of a church or temple which Christ has forsaken.” <i>Longe fallun