mh_parser/scraps/Judg_11_29-Judg_11_40.html

8 lines
17 KiB
HTML
Raw Normal View History

2023-12-17 20:08:46 +00:00
<p>We have here Jephthah triumphing in a glorious victory, but, as an alloy to his joy, troubled and distressed by an unadvised vow.</p>
<p class="tab-1">I. Jephthahs victory was clear, and shines very brightly, both to his honour and to the honour of God, his in pleading and Gods in owning a righteous cause. 1. God gave him an excellent spirit, and he improved it bravely, <a class="bibleref" title="Judg.11.29" href="/passage/?search=Judg.11.29">Jdg. 11:29</a>. When it appeared by the peoples unanimous choice of him for their leader that he had so clear a call to engage, and by the obstinate deafness of the king of Ammon to the proposals of accommodation that he had so just a cause to engage in, then the Spirit of the Lord came upon him, and very much advanced his natural faculties, enduing him with power from on high, and making him more bold and more wise than ever he had been, and more fired with a holy zeal against the enemies of his people. Hereby God confirmed him in his office, and assured him of success in his undertaking. Thus animated, he loses no time, but with an undaunted resolution takes the field. Particular notice is taken of the way by which he advanced towards the enemys camp, probably because the choice of it was an instance of that extraordinary discretion with which the Spirit of the Lord had furnished him; for those who sincerely walk after the Spirit shall be led forth the right way. 2. God gave him eminent success, and he bravely improved that too (<a class="bibleref" title="Judg.11.32" href="/passage/?search=Judg.11.32">Jdg. 11:32</a>): <i>The Lord delivered the Ammonites into his hand</i>, and so gave judgment upon the appeal in favour of the righteous cause, and made those feel the force of war that would not yield to the force of reason; for he <i>sits in the throne, judging right</i>. Jephthah lost not the advantages given him, but pursued and completed his victory. Having routed their forces in the field, he pursued them to their cities, where he put to the sword all he found in arms, so as utterly to disable them from giving Israel any molestation, <a class="bibleref" title="Judg.11.33" href="/passage/?search=Judg.11.33">Jdg. 11:33</a>. But it does not appear that he utterly destroyed the people, as Joshua had destroyed the devoted nations, nor that he offered to make himself master of the country, though their pretensions to the land of Israel might have given him colour to do so: only he took care that they should be effectually subdued. Though others attempting wrong to us will justify us in the defence of our own right, yet it will not authorize us to do them wrong.</p>
<p class="tab-1">II. Jephthahs vow is dark, and much in the clouds. When he was going out from his own house upon this hazardous undertaking, in prayer to God for his presence with him he makes a secret but solemn vow or religious promise to God, that, if God would graciously bring him back a conqueror, whosoever or whatsoever should first come out of his house to meet him it should be devoted to God, and offered up for a burnt-offering. At his return, tidings of his victory coming home before him, his own and only daughter meets him with the seasonable expressions of joy. This puts him into a great confusion; but there was no remedy: after she had taken some time to lament her own infelicity, she cheerfully submitted to the performance of his vow. Now,</p>
<p class="tab-1">1. There are several good lessons to be learnt out of this story. (1.) That there may be remainders of distrust and doubting even in the hearts of true and great believers. Jephthah had reason enough to be confident of success, especially when he found <i>the Spirit of the Lord come upon him</i>, and yet, now that it comes to the settling, he seems to hesitate (<a class="bibleref" title="Judg.11.30" href="/passage/?search=Judg.11.30">Jdg. 11:30</a>): <i>If thou wilt without fail deliver them into my hand</i>, then I will do so and so. And perhaps the snare into which his vow brought him was designed to correct the weakness of his faith, and a fond conceit he had that he could not promise himself a victory unless he proffered something considerable to be given to God in lieu of it. (2.) That yet it is very good, when we are in the pursuit or expectation of any mercy, to make vows to God of some instance of acceptable service to him, not as a purchase of the favour we desire, but as an expression of our gratitude to him and the deep sense we have of our obligations to render according to the benefit done to us. The matter of such a singular vow (<a class="bibleref" title="Lev.27.2" href="/passage/?search=Lev.27.2">Lev. 27:2</a>) must be something that has a plain and direct tendency either to the advancement of Gods glory, and the interests of his kingdom among men, or to the furtherance of ourselves in his service, and in that which is antecedently our duty. (3.) That we have great need to be very cautious and well advised in the making of such vows, lest, by indulging a present emotion even of pious zeal, we entangle our own consciences, involve ourselves in perplexities, and are forced at last to <i>say before the angel that it was an error</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Eccl.5.2-Eccl.5.6" href="/passage/?search=Eccl.5.2-Eccl.5.6">Eccl. 5:2-6</a>. <i>It is a snare to a man</i> hastily to <i>devour that which is holy</i>, without due consideration <i>quid valeant humeri, quid ferre recusent—what we are able or unable to effect</i>, and without inserting the needful provisos and limitations which might prevent the entanglement, and then after vows to make the enquiry which should have been made before, <a class="bibleref" title="Prov.20.25" href="/passage/?search=Prov.20.25">Prov. 20:25</a>. Let Jephthahs harm be our warning in this matter. See <a class="bibleref" title="Deut.23.22" href="/passage/?search=Deut.23.22">Deut. 23:22</a>. (4.) That what we have solemnly vowed to God we must conscientiously perform, if it be possible and lawful, though it be ever so difficult and grievous to us. Jephthahs sense of the powerful obligation of his vow must always be ours (<a class="bibleref" title="Judg.11.35" href="/passage/?search=Judg.11.35">Jdg. 11:35</a>): “<i>I have opened my mouth unto the Lord</i> in a solemn vow, <i>and I cannot go back</i>,” that is, “I cannot recall the vow myself, it is too late, nor can any power on earth dispense with it, or give me up my bond.” The thing was my own, and <i>in my own power</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="Acts.5.4" href="/passage/?search=Acts.5.4">Acts 5:4</a>), but now it is not. <i>Vow and pay</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Ps.76.11" href="/passage/?search=Ps.76.11">Ps. 76:11</a>. We deceive ourselves if we think to mock God. If we apply this to the consent we have solemnly given, in our sacramental vows, to the covenant of grace made with poor sinners in Christ, what a powerful argument will it be against the sins we have by those vows bound ourselves out from, what a strong inducement to the duties we have hereby bound ourselves up to, and what a ready answer to every temptation! “<i>I have opened my mouth to the Lord</i>, and <i>I cannot go back</i>; I must therefore go forward. I have sworn, and I must, I will, perform it. Let me not dare to play fast and loose with God.” (5.) That it well becomes children obediently and cheerfully to submit to their parents in the Lord, and particularly to comply with their pious resolutions for the ho
<p class="tab-1">2. Yet there are some difficult questions that do arise upon this story which have very much employed the pens of learned men. I will say but little respecting them, because Mr. Poole has discussed them very fully in his English annotations.</p>
<p class="tab-1">(1.) It is hard to say what Jephthah did to his daughter in performance of his vow. [1.] Some think he only shut her up for a nun, and that it being unlawful, according to one part of his vow (for they make it disjunctive), to offer her up for a burnt-offering, he thus, according to the other part, engaged her to <i>be the Lords</i>, that is, totally to sequester herself from all the affairs of this life, and consequently from marriage, and to employ herself wholly in the acts of devotion all her days. That which countenances this opinion is that she is <i>said to bewail her virginity</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="Judg.11.37,Judg.11.38" href="/passage/?search=Judg.11.37,Judg.11.38"><span class="bibleref" title="Judg.11.37">Jdg. 11:37</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Judg.11.38">38</span></a>) and that <i>she knew no man</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Judg.11.39" href="/passage/?search=Judg.11.39">Jdg. 11:39</a>. But, if he sacrificed her, it was proper enough for her to bewail, not her death, because that was intended to be for the honour of God, and she would undergo it cheerfully, but that unhappy circumstance of it which made it more grievous to her than any other, because she was her fathers only child, in whom he hoped his name and family would be built up, that she was unmarried, and so left no issue to inherit her fathers honour and estate; therefore it is particularly taken notice of (<a class="bibleref" title="Judg.11.34" href="/passage/?search=Judg.11.34">Jdg. 11:34</a>) that besides her he had neither son nor daughter. But that which makes me think Jephthah did not go about thus to satisfy his vow, or evade it rather, is that we do not find any law, usage, or custom, in all the Old Testament, which does in the least intimate that a single life was any branch or article of religion, or that any person, man or woman, was looked upon as the more holy, more the Lords, or devoted to him, for living unmarried: it was no part of the law either of the priests or of the Nazarites. Deborah and Huldah, both prophetesses, are both of them particularly recorded to have been married women. Besides, had she only been confined to a single life, she needed not to have desired these two months to bewail it in: she had her whole life before her to do that, if she saw cause. Nor needed she to take such a sad leave of her companions; for those that are of that opinion understand what is said in <a class="bibleref" title="Judg.11.40" href="/passage/?search=Judg.11.40">Jdg. 11:40</a> of their coming to <i>talk with her</i>, as our margin reads it, four days in a year. Therefore, [2.] It seems more probable that he offered her up for a sacrifice, according to the letter of his vow, misunderstanding that law which spoke of persons devoted by the curse of God as if it were to be applied to such as were devoted by mens vows (<a class="bibleref" title="Lev.27.29" href="/passage/?search=Lev.27.29">Lev. 27:29</a>; <i>None devoted shall be redeemed, but shall surely be put to death</i>), and wanting to be better informed of the power the law gave him in this case to redeem her. Abrahams attempt to offer up Isaac perhaps encouraged him, and made him think, if God would not accept this sacrifice which he had vowed, he would send an angel to stay his hand, as he did Abrahams. If she came out designedly to be made a sacrifice, as who knows but she might? perhaps he thought that would make the case the plainer. <i>Volenti non sit injuria—No injury is done to a person by that to which he himself consents</i>. He imagined, it may be, that where there was neither anger nor malice there was no murder, and that his good intention would sanctify this bad action; and, since he had made such a vow, he thought better to kill his daughter than break his vow, and let Providence bear the blame, that brought her forth to meet him.</p>
<p class="tab-1">(2.) But, supposing that Jephthah did sacrifice his daughter, the question is whether he did well. [1.] Some justify him in it, and think he did well, and as became one that preferred the honour of God before that which was dearest to him in this world. He is mentioned among the eminent believers who by faith did great things, <a class="bibleref" title="Heb.11.32" href="/passage/?search=Heb.11.32">Heb. 11:32</a>. And this was one of the great things he did. It was done deliberately, and upon two months consideration and consultation. He is never blamed for it by any inspired writer. Though it highly exalts the paternal authority, yet it cannot justify any in doing the like. He was an extraordinary person. <i>The Spirit of the Lord came upon him</i>. Many circumstances, now unknown to us, might make this altogether extraordinary, and justify it, yet not so as that it might justify the like. Some learned men have made this sacrifice a figure of Christ the great sacrifice: he was of unspotted purity and innocency, as she a chaste virgin; he was devoted to death by his Father, and so made a curse, or an anathema, for us; he submitted himself, as she did, to his Fathers will: <i>Not as I will, but as thou wilt</i>. But, [2.] Most condemn Jephthah; he did ill to make so rash a vow, and worse to perform it. He could not be bound by his vow to that which God had forbidden by the letter of the sixth commandment: <i>Thou shalt not kill</i>. God had forbidden human sacrifices, so that it was (says Dr. Lightfoot) in effect a sacrifice to Moloch. And, probably, the reason why it is left dubious by the inspired penman whether he sacrificed her or no was that those who did afterwards offer their children might not take any encouragement from this instance. Concerning this and some other such passages in the sacred story, which learned men are in the dark, divided, and in doubt about, we need not much perplex ourselves; what is necessary to our salvation, thanks be to God, is plain enough.</p>