mh_parser/scraps/John_13_1-John_13_17.html

<p>It has generally been taken for granted by commentators that Christ’s washing his disciples’ feet, and the discourse that followed it, were the same night in which he was betrayed, and at the same sitting wherein he ate the passover and instituted the Lord’s supper; but whether before the solemnity began, or after it was all over, or between the eating of the passover and the institution of the Lord’s supper, they are not agreed. This evangelist, making it his business to gather up those passages which the others had omitted, industriously omits those which the others had recorded, which occasions some difficulty in putting them together. If it was then, we suppose that <i>Judas went out</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="John.13.30" href="/passage/?search=John.13.30">John 13:30</a>) to get his men ready that were to apprehend the Lord Jesus in the garden. But Dr. Lightfoot is clearly of opinion that this was done and said, even all that is recorded to the end of <a class="bibleref" title="John.3.31" href="/passage/?search=John.3.31">John 3:31</a>-<a class="bibleref" title="John.14.31" href="/passage/?search=John.14.31">14:31</a>; not at the passover supper, for it is here said (<a class="bibleref" title="John.13.1" href="/passage/?search=John.13.1">John 13:1</a>) to be <i>before the feast of the passover</i>, but at the supper in Bethany, two days before the passover (of which we read <a class="bibleref" title="Matt.26.2-Matt.26.6" href="/passage/?search=Matt.26.2-Matt.26.6">Matt. 26:2-6</a>), at which Mary the second time anointed Christ’s head with the remainder of her box of ointment. Or, it might be at some other supper the night before the passover, not as that was in the house of Simon the leper, but in his own lodgings, where he had none but his disciples about him, and could be more free with them.</p>
<p class="tab-1">In <a class="bibleref" title="John.13.1-John.13.17" href="/passage/?search=John.13.1-John.13.17">John 13:1-17</a> we have the story of Christ’s washing his disciples’ feet; it was an action of a singular nature; no miracle, unless we call it a miracle of humility. Mary had just anointed his head; now, lest his acceptance of this should look like taking state, he presently balances it with this act of abasement. But why would Christ do this? If the disciples’ feet needed washing, they could wash them themselves; a wise man will not do a thing that looks odd and unusual, but for very good causes and considerations. We are sure that it was not in a humour or a frolic that this was done; no, the transaction was very solemn, and carried on with a great deal of seriousness; and four reasons are here intimated why Christ did this:—1. That he might testify his love to his disciples, <a class="bibleref" title="John.13.1,John.13.2" href="/passage/?search=John.13.1,John.13.2"><span class="bibleref" title="John.13.1">John 13:1</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="John.13.2">2</span></a>. 2. That he might give an instance of his own voluntary humility and condescension, <a class="bibleref" title="John.13.3-John.13.5" href="/passage/?search=John.13.3-John.13.5">John 13:3-5</a>. 3. That he might signify to them spiritual washing, which is referred to in his discourse with Peter, <a class="bibleref" title="John.13.6-John.13.11" href="/passage/?search=John.13.6-John.13.11">John 13:6-11</a>. 4. That he might set them an example, <a class="bibleref" title="John.13.12-John.13.17" href="/passage/?search=John.13.12-John.13.17">John 13:12-17</a>. And the opening of these four reasons will take in the exposition of the whole story.</p>
<p class="tab-1">I. Christ washed his disciples’ feet that he might give a proof of that great love wherewith he loved them; loved them to the end, <a class="bibleref" title="John.13.1,John.13.2" href="/passage/?search=John.13.1,John.13.2"><span class="bibleref" title="John.13.1">John 13:1</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="John.13.2">2</span></a>.</p>
<p class="tab-1">1. It is here laid down as an undoubted truth that our Lord Jesus, <i>having loved his own that were in the world, loved them to the end</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="John.13.1" href="/passage/?search=John.13.1">John 13:1</a>.</p>
<p class="tab-1">(1.) This is true of the disciples that were his immediate followers, in particular the twelve. These were his own in the world, his family, his school, his bosom-friends. Children he had none to call his own, but he adopted them, and took them as his own. He had those that were his own in the other world, but he left them for a time, to look after his own in this world. These he loved, he called them into fellowship with himself, conversed familiarly with them, was always tender of them, and of their comfort and reputation. He allowed them to be very free with him, and bore with their infirmities. He loved them to the end, continued his love to them as long as he lived, and after his resurrection; he never took away his loving kindness. Though there were some persons of quality that espoused his cause, he did not lay aside his old friends, to make room for new ones, but still stuck to his poor fishermen. They were weak and defective in knowledge and grace, dull and forgetful; and yet, though he reproved them often, he never ceased to love them and take care of them.</p>
<p class="tab-1">(2.) It is true of all believers, for these twelve patriarchs were the representatives of all the tribes of God’s spiritual Israel. Note, [1.] Our Lord Jesus has a people in the world that are his own,—his own, for they were given him by the Father, he has purchased them, and paid dearly for them, and he has set them apart for himself,—his own, for they have devoted themselves to him as a peculiar people. <i>His own</i>; where <i>his own</i> were spoken of that <i>received him not</i>, it is <b><i>tous idious</i></b>—<i>his own persons</i>, as a man’s wife and children are his own, to whom he stands in a constant relation. [2.] Christ has a cordial love for his own that are in the world. He <i>did</i> love them with a love of goodwill when he gave himself for their redemption. He <i>does</i> love them with a love of complacency when he admits them into communion with himself. Though they are <i>in this world</i>, a world of darkness and distance, of sin and corruption, yet he loves them. He was now going to his own in heaven, the spirits of just men made perfect there; but he seems most concerned for his own on earth, because they most needed his care: the sickly child is most indulged. [3.] Those whom Christ loves <i>he loves to the end</i>; he is constant in his love to his people; he <i>rests in his love</i>. He loves with an everlasting love (<a class="bibleref" title="Jer.31.3" href="/passage/?search=Jer.31.3">Jer. 31:3</a>), from everlasting in the counsels of it to everlasting in the consequences of it. Nothing can separate a believer <i>from the love of Christ</i>; he loves his own, <b><i>eis telos</i></b>—<i>unto perfection</i>, for he will perfect what concerns them, will bring them to that world where love is perfect.</p>
<p class="tab-1">2. Christ manifested his love to them by washing their feet, as that good woman (<a class="bibleref" title="Luke.7.38" href="/passage/?search=Luke.7.38">Luke 7:38</a>) showed her love to Christ by washing his feet and wiping them. Thus he would show that as his love to them was constant so it was condescending,—that in prosecution of the designs of it he was willing to humble himself,—and that the glories of his exalted state, which he was now entering upon, should be no obstruction at all to the favour he bore to his chosen; and thus he would confirm the promise he had made to all the saints that he would <i>make them sit down to meat, and would come forth and serve them</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="Luke.12.37" href="/passage/?search=Luke.12.37">Luke 12:37</a>), would put honour upon them as great and surprising as for a lord to serve his servants. The disciples had just now betrayed the weakness of their love to him, in grudging the ointment that was poured upon his head (<a class="bibleref" title="Matt.26.8" href="/passage/?search=Matt.26.8">Matt. 26:8</a>), yet he presently gives this proof of his love to them. Our infirmities are foils to Christ’s kindnesses, and set them off.</p>
<p class="tab-1">3. He chose this time to do it, a little before his last passover, for two reasons:—</p>
<p class="tab-1">(1.) Because now <i>he knew that his hour was come</i>, which he had long expected, <i>when he should depart out of this world to the Father</i>. Observe here, [1.] The change that was to pass over our Lord Jesus; he must <i>depart</i>. This began at his death, but was completed at his ascension. As Christ himself, so all believers, by virtue of their union with him, when they depart out of the world, are absent from the body, <i>go to the Father</i>, are present with the Lord. It is a departure <i>out of the world</i>, this unkind, injurious world, this faithless, treacherous world—this world of labour, toil, and temptation—this vale of tears; and it is a going <i>to the Father</i>, to the vision of the Father of spirits, and the fruition of him as ours. [2.] The time of this change: <i>His hour was come</i>. It is sometimes called his enemies’ hour (<a class="bibleref" title="Luke.22.53" href="/passage/?search=Luke.22.53">Luke 22:53</a>), the hour of their triumph; sometimes his hour, the hour of his triumph, the hour he had had in his eye all along. The time of his sufferings was fixed to an hour, and the continuance of them but for an hour. [3.] His foresight of it: He <i>knew that his hour was come</i>; he knew from the beginning that it would come, and when, but now he knew that it <i>was come</i>. We know not when our hour will come, and therefore what we have to do in habitual preparation for it ought never to be undone; but, when we know by the harbingers that our hour is come, we must vigorously apply ourselves to an actual preparation, as our Master did, <a class="bibleref" title="2Pet.3.14" href="/passage/?search=2Pet.3.14">2 Pet. 3:14</a>. Now it was in the immediate foresight of his departure that he <i>washed his disciples’ feet</i>; that, as his own head was anointed just now <i>against the day of his burial</i>, so their feet might be washed against the day of their consecration by the descent of the Holy Ghost fifty days after, as the priests were washed, <a class="bibleref" title="Lev.8.6" href="/passage/?search=Lev.8.6">Lev. 8:6</a>. When we see our day approaching, we should do what good we can to those we leave behind.</p>
<p class="tab-1">(2.) Because the <i>devil had now put it into the heart of Judas to betray him</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="John.13.2" href="/passage/?search=John.13.2">John 13:2</a>. These words in a parenthesis may be considered, [1.] As tracing Judas’s treason to its origin; it was a sin of such a nature that it evidently bore the devil’s image and superscription. What way of access the devil has to men’s hearts, and by what methods he darts in his suggestions, and mingles them undiscerned with those thoughts which are the natives of the heart, we cannot tell. But there are some sins in their own nature so exceedingly sinful, and to which there is so little temptation from the world and the flesh, that it is plain Satan lays the egg of them in a heart disposed to be the nest to hatch them in. For Judas to betray such a master, to betray him so cheaply and upon no provocation, was such downright enmity to God as could not be forged but by Satan himself, who thereby thought to ruin the Redeemer’s kingdom, but did in fact ruin his own. [2.] As intimating a reason why Christ now washed his disciples’ feet. <i>First</i>, Judas being now resolved to betray him, the time of his departure could not be far off; if this matter be determined, it is easy to infer with St. Paul, <i>I am now ready to be offered</i>. Note, The more malicious we perceive our enemies to be against us, the more industrious we should be to prepare for the worst that may come. <i>Secondly</i>, Judas being now got into the snare, and the devil aiming at Peter and the rest of them (<a class="bibleref" title="Luke.22.31" href="/passage/?search=Luke.22.31">Luke 22:31</a>), Christ would fortify his own against him. If the wolf has seized one of the flock, it is time for the shepherd to look well to the rest. Antidotes must be stirring, when the infection is begun. Dr. Lightfoot observes that the disciples had learned of Judas to murmur at the anointing of Christ; compare <a class="bibleref" title="John.12.4,Matt.26.8" href="/passage/?search=John.12.4,Matt.26.8"><span class="bibleref" title="John.12.4">John 12:4</span>; <span class="bibleref" title="Matt.26.8">Matt. 26:8</span></a>. Now, lest those that had learned that of him should learn worse, he fortifies them by a lesson of humility against his most dangerous assaults. <i>Thirdly</i>, Judas, who was now plotting to betray him, was <i>one of the twelve</i>. Now Christ would hereby show that he did not design to cast them all off for the faults of one. Though one of their college had a devil, and was a traitor, yet they should fare never the worse for that. Christ loves his church though there are hypocrites in it, and had still a kindness for his disciples though there was a Judas among them and he knew it.</p>
<p class="tab-1">II. Christ washed his disciples’ feet that he might give an instance of his own wonderful humility, and show how lowly and condescending he was, and let all the world know how low he could stoop in love to his own. This is intimated, <a class="bibleref" title="John.13.3-John.13.5" href="/passage/?search=John.13.3-John.13.5">John 13:3-5</a>. <i>Jesus knowing</i>, and now actually considering, and perhaps discoursing of, his honours as Mediator, and telling his friends that <i>the Father had given all things into his hand, rises from supper</i>, and, to the great surprise of the company, who wondered what he was going to do, <i>washed his disciples’ feet</i>.</p>
<p class="tab-1">1. Here is the rightful advancement of the Lord Jesus. Glorious things are here said of Christ as Mediator.</p>
<p class="tab-1">(1.) <i>The Father had given all things into his hands</i>; had given him a propriety in all, and a power over all, as possessor of heaven and earth, in pursuance of the great designs of his undertaking; see <a class="bibleref" title="Matt.11.27" href="/passage/?search=Matt.11.27">Matt. 11:27</a>. The accommodation and arbitration of all matters in variance between God and man were committed into his hands as the great umpire and referee; and the administration of the kingdom of God among men, in all the branches of it, was committed to him; so that all acts, both of government and judgment, were to pass through his hands; he is <i>heir of all things</i>.</p>
<p class="tab-1">(2.) He <i>came from God</i>. This implies that he was in the beginning with God, and had a being and glory, not only before he was born into this world, but before the world itself was born; and that when he came into the world he came as God’s ambassador, with a commission from him. He came from God as the son of God, and the sent of God. The Old-Testament prophets were raised up and employed for God, but Christ came directly from him.</p>
<p class="tab-1">(3.) He <i>went to God</i>, to be glorified with him with the same glory which he had with God from eternity. That which comes from God shall go to God; those that are born from heaven are bound for heaven. As Christ came from God to be an agent for him on earth, so he went to God to be an agent for us in heaven; and it is a comfort to us to think how welcome he was there: he was brought near to the <i>Ancient of days</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Dan.7.13" href="/passage/?search=Dan.7.13">Dan. 7:13</a>. And it was said to him, <i>Sit thou at my right hand</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Ps.110.1" href="/passage/?search=Ps.110.1">Ps. 110:1</a>.</p>
<p class="tab-1">(4.) He <i>knew</i> all this; was not like a prince in the cradle, that knows nothing of the honour he is born to, or like Moses, who <i>wist not that his face shone</i>; no, he had a full view of all the honours of his exalted state, and yet stooped thus low. But how does this come in here? [1.] As an inducement to him now quickly to leave what lessons and legacies he had to leave to his disciples, because his hour was now come when he must take his leave of them, and be exalted above that familiar converse which he now had with them, <a class="bibleref" title="John.13.1" href="/passage/?search=John.13.1">John 13:1</a>. [2.] It may come in as that which supported him under his sufferings, and carried him cheerfully through this sharp encounter. Judas was now betraying him, and he knew it, and knew what would be the consequence of it; yet, knowing also <i>that he came from God and went to God</i>, he did not draw back, but went on cheerfully. [3.] It seems to come in as a foil to his condescension, to make it the more admirable. The reasons of divine grace are sometimes represented in scripture as strange and surprising (as <a class="bibleref" title="Isa.57.17,Isa.57.18,Hos.2.13,Hos.2.14" href="/passage/?search=Isa.57.17,Isa.57.18,Hos.2.13,Hos.2.14"><span class="bibleref" title="Isa.57.17">Isa. 57:17</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Isa.57.18">18</span>; <span class="bibleref" title="Hos.2.13">Hos. 2:13</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Hos.2.14">14</span></a>); so here, that is given as an inducement to Christ to stoop which should rather have been a reason for his taking state; for God’s thoughts are not as ours. Compare with this those passages which preface the most signal instances of condescending grace with the displays of divine glory, as <a class="bibleref" title="Ps.68.4,Ps.68.5,Isa.57.15,Isa.66.1,Isa.66.2" href="/passage/?search=Ps.68.4,Ps.68.5,Isa.57.15,Isa.66.1,Isa.66.2"><span class="bibleref" title="Ps.68.4">Ps. 68:4</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Ps.68.5">5</span>; <span class="bibleref" title="Isa.57.15">Isa. 57:15</span>; <span class="bibleref" title="Isa.66.1">66:1</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Isa.66.2">2</span></a>.</p>
<p class="tab-1">2. Here is the voluntary abasement of our Lord Jesus notwithstanding this. <i>Jesus knowing</i> his own glory as God, and his own authority and power as Mediator, one would think it should follow, <i>He rises from supper</i>, lays aside his ordinary garments, calls for robes, bids them keep their distance, and do him homage; but no, quite the contrary, when he considered this he gave the greatest instance of humility. Note, A well-grounded assurance of heaven and happiness, instead of puffing a man up with pride, will make and keep him very humble. Those that would be found conformable to Christ, and partakers of his Spirit, must study to keep their minds low in the midst of the greatest advancements. Now that which Christ humbled himself to was to <i>wash his disciples’ feet</i>.</p>
<p class="tab-1">(1.) The action itself was mean and servile, and that which servants of the lowest rank were employed in. <i>Let thine handmaid</i> (saith Abigail) <i>be a servant to wash the feet of the servants of my lord</i>; let me be in the meanest employment, <a class="bibleref" title="1Sam.25.41" href="/passage/?search=1Sam.25.41">1 Sam. 25:41</a>. If he had washed their hands or faces, it had been great condescension (Elisha poured water on the hands of Elijah, <a class="bibleref" title="2Kgs.3.11" href="/passage/?search=2Kgs.3.11">2 Kgs. 3:11</a>); but for Christ to stoop to such a piece of drudgery as this may well excite our admiration. Thus he would teach us to think nothing below us wherein we may be serviceable to God’s glory and the good of our brethren.</p>
<p class="tab-1">(2.) The condescension was so much the greater that he did this for his own disciples, who in themselves were of a low and despicable condition, not curious about their bodies; their feet, it is likely, were seldom washed, and therefore very dirty. In relation to him, they were his scholars, his servants, and such as should have washed his feet, whose dependence was upon him, and their expectations from him. Many of great spirits otherwise will do a mean thing to curry favour with their superiors; they rise by stooping, and climb by cringing; but for Christ to do this to <i>his disciples</i> could be no act of policy nor complaisance, but pure humility.</p>
<p class="tab-1">(3.) He <i>rose from supper</i> to do it. Though we translate it (<a class="bibleref" title="John.13.2" href="/passage/?search=John.13.2">John 13:2</a>) <i>supper being ended</i>, it might be better read, <i>there being a supper made</i>, or <i>he being at supper</i>, for he sat down again (<a class="bibleref" title="John.13.12" href="/passage/?search=John.13.12">John 13:12</a>), and we find him dipping a sop (<a class="bibleref" title="John.13.26" href="/passage/?search=John.13.26">John 13:26</a>), so that he did it in the midst of his meal, and thereby taught us, [1.] Not to reckon it a disturbance, nor any just cause of uneasiness, to be called from our meal to do God or our brother any real service, esteeming the discharge of our duty <i>more than our necessary food</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="John.4.34" href="/passage/?search=John.4.34">John 4:34</a>. Christ would not leave his preaching to oblige his nearest relations (<a class="bibleref" title="Mark.3.33" href="/passage/?search=Mark.3.33">Mark 3:33</a>), but would leave his supper to show his love to his disciples. [2.] Not to be over nice about our meat. It would have turned many a squeamish stomach to wash dirty feet at supper-time; but Christ did it, not that we might learn to be rude and slovenly (cleanliness and godliness will do well together), but to teach us not to be curious, not to indulge, but mortify, the delicacy of the appetite, giving good manners their due place, and no more.</p>
<p class="tab-1">(4.) He put himself into the garb of a servant, to do it: he <i>laid aside</i> his loose and upper <i>garments</i>, that he might apply himself to this service the more expeditely. We must address ourselves to duty as those that are resolved not to take state, but to take pains; we must divest ourselves of every thing that would either feed our pride or hang in our way and hinder us in what we have to do, must <i>gird up the loins of our mind</i>, as those that in earnest buckle to business.</p>
<p class="tab-1">(5.) He did it with all the humble ceremony that could be, went through all the parts of the service distinctly, and passed by none of them; he did it as if he had been used thus to serve; did it himself alone, and had none to minister to him in it. He <i>girded himself with the towel</i>, as servants throw a napkin on their arm, or put an apron before them; he <i>poured water into the basin</i> out of the water-pots that stood by (<a class="bibleref" title="John.2.6" href="/passage/?search=John.2.6">John 2:6</a>), and then <i>washed their feet</i>; and, to complete the service, <i>wiped them</i>. Some think that he did not wash the feet of them all, but only four or five of them, that being thought sufficient to answer the end; but I see nothing to countenance this conjecture, for in other places where he did make a difference it is taken notice of; and his washing the feet of them <i>all</i>, without exception, teaches us a catholic and extensive charity to all Christ’s disciples, even the least.</p>
<p class="tab-1">(6.) Nothing appears to the contrary but that he washed the feet of Judas among the rest, for he was present, <a class="bibleref" title="John.13.26" href="/passage/?search=John.13.26">John 13:26</a>. It is the character of a <i>widow indeed</i> that she had washed the saints’ feet (<a class="bibleref" title="1Tim.5.10" href="/passage/?search=1Tim.5.10">1 Tim. 5:10</a>), and there is some comfort in this; but the blessed Jesus here washed the feet of a sinner, the worst of sinners, the worst to him, who was at this time contriving to betray him.</p>
<p class="tab-1">Many interpreters consider Christ’s washing his disciples’ feet as a representation of <i>his whole undertaking</i>. He knew that he was equal with God, and all things were his; and yet he rose from his table in glory, laid aside his robes of light, girded himself with our nature, took upon him the form of a servant, <i>came not to be ministered to, but to minister</i>, poured out his blood, poured out his soul unto death, and thereby prepared a laver to wash us from our sins, <a class="bibleref" title="Rev.1.5" href="/passage/?search=Rev.1.5">Rev. 1:5</a>.</p>
<p class="tab-1">III. Christ washed his disciples’ feet that he might signify to them spiritual washing, and the cleansing of the soul from the pollutions of sin. This is plainly intimated in his discourse with Peter upon it, <a class="bibleref" title="John.13.6-John.13.11" href="/passage/?search=John.13.6-John.13.11">John 13:6-11</a>, in which we may observe,</p>
<p class="tab-1">1. The surprise Peter was in when he saw his Master go about this mean service (<a class="bibleref" title="John.13.6" href="/passage/?search=John.13.6">John 13:6</a>): <i>Then cometh he to Simon Peter</i>, with his towel and basin, and bids him put out his feet to be washed. Chrysostom conjectures that he first washed the feet of Judas, who readily admitted the honour, and was pleased to see his Master so disparage himself. It is most probable that when he <i>went about</i> this service (which is all that is meant by his <i>beginning</i> to wash, <a class="bibleref" title="John.13.5" href="/passage/?search=John.13.5">John 13:5</a>) he took Peter first, and that the rest would not have suffered it, if they had not first heard it explained in what passed between Christ and Peter. Whether Christ came first to Peter or no, when he did come to him, Peter was startled at the proposal: <i>Lord</i> (saith he) <i>dost thou wash my feet</i>? Here is an emphasis to be laid upon the persons, <i>thou</i> and <i>me</i>; and the placing of the words is observable, <b><i>sy mou</i></b>—<i>what, thou mine? Tu mihi lavas pedes? Quid est tu? Quid est mihi? Cogitanda sunt potius quam dicenda—Dost thou wash my feet? What is it thou? What to me? These things are rather to be contemplated than uttered</i>.—Aug. in loc. What <i>thou</i>, our Lord and Master, whom we know and believe to be the Son of God, and Saviour and ruler of the world, do this for <i>me</i>, a worthless worm of the earth, <i>a sinful man, O Lord</i>? Shall those hands wash my feet which with a touch have cleansed lepers, given sight to the blind, and raised the dead? So Theophylact, and from him Dr. Taylor. Very willingly would Peter have taken the basin and towel, and washed his Master’s feet, and been proud of the honour, <a class="bibleref" title="Luke.17.7,Luke.17.8" href="/passage/?search=Luke.17.7,Luke.17.8"><span class="bibleref" title="Luke.17.7">Luke 17:7</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Luke.17.8">8</span></a>. “This had been natural and regular; for <i>my Master</i> to wash my feet is such a solecism as never was; such a paradox as I cannot understand. <i>Isa. this the manner of men</i>?” Note, Christ’s condescensions, especially his condescensions to <i>us</i>, wherein we find ourselves taken notice of by his grace, are justly the matter of our admiration, <a class="bibleref" title="John.14.22" href="/passage/?search=John.14.22">John 14:22</a>. <i>Who am I, Lord God? And what is my father’s house</i>?</p>
<p class="tab-1">2. The immediate satisfaction Christ gave to this question of surprise. This was at least sufficient to silence his objections (<a class="bibleref" title="John.13.7" href="/passage/?search=John.13.7">John 13:7</a>): <i>What I do, thou knowest not now, but thou shalt know hereafter</i>. Here are two reasons why Peter must submit to what Christ was doing:—</p>
<p class="tab-1">(1.) Because he was at present in the dark concerning it, and ought not to oppose what he did not understand, but acquiesce in the will and wisdom of one who could give a good reason for all he said and did. Christ would teach Peter an <i>implicit obedience: “What I do thou knowest not now</i>, and therefore art no competent judge of it, but must believe it is well done because I do it.” Note, Consciousness to ourselves of the darkness we labour under, and our inability to judge of what God does, should make us sparing and modest in our censures of his proceedings; see <a class="bibleref" title="Heb.11.8" href="/passage/?search=Heb.11.8">Heb. 11:8</a>.</p>
<p class="tab-1">(2.) Because there was something considerable in it, of which he should hereafter know the meaning: “<i>Thou shalt know hereafter</i> what need thou hast of being washed, when thou shalt be guilty of the heinous sin of denying me;” so some. “Thou shalt know, when, in the discharge of the office of an apostle, thou wilt be employed in washing off from those under thy charge the sins and defilements of their earthly affections;” so Dr. Hammond. Note, [1.] Our Lord Jesus does many things the meaning of which even his own disciples do not for the present know, but they <i>shall know afterwards</i>. What he did when he became man for us and what he did when he became a worm and no man for us, what he did when he lived our life and what he did when he laid it down, could not be understood till afterwards, and then it appeared that <i>it behoved him</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Heb.2.17" href="/passage/?search=Heb.2.17">Heb. 2:17</a>. Subsequent providences explain preceding ones; and we see afterwards what was the kind tendency of events that seemed most cross; and the way which we thought was <i>about</i> proved the <i>right way</i>. [2.] Christ’s washing his disciples’ feet had a significancy in it, which they themselves did not understand till afterwards, when Christ explained it to be a specimen of the laver of regeneration, and till the Spirit was poured out upon them from on high. We must let Christ take his own way, both in ordinances and providences, and we shall find in the issue it was the best way.</p>
<p class="tab-1">3. Peter’s peremptory refusal, notwithstanding this, to let Christ wash his feet (<a class="bibleref" title="John.13.8" href="/passage/?search=John.13.8">John 13:8</a>): <i>Thou shalt by no means wash my feet; no, never</i>. So it is in the original. It is the language of a fixed resolution. Now, (1.) Here was a show of humility and modesty. Peter herein seemed to have, and no doubt he really had, a great respect for his Master, as he had, <a class="bibleref" title="Luke.5.8" href="/passage/?search=Luke.5.8">Luke 5:8</a>. Thus many are beguiled of their reward in a <i>voluntary humility</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="Col.2.18,Col.2.23" href="/passage/?search=Col.2.18,Col.2.23"><span class="bibleref" title="Col.2.18">Col. 2:18</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Col.2.23">23</span></a>), such a self-denial as Christ neither appoints nor accepts; for, (2.) Under this show of humility there was a real contradiction to the will of the Lord Jesus: “I <i>will wash thy feet</i>,” saith Christ; “But thou never shalt,” saith Peter, “it is not a fitting thing;” so making himself wiser than Christ. It is not humility, but infidelity, to put away the offers of the gospel, as if too rich to be made to us or too good news to be true.</p>
<p class="tab-1">4. Christ’s insisting upon his offer, and a good reason given to Peter why he should accept it: <i>If I wash thee not, thou hast no part with me</i>. This may be taken, (1.) As a severe caution against disobedience: “<i>If I wash thee not</i>, if thou continue refractory, and wilt not comply with thy Master’s will in so small a matter, thou shalt not be owned as one of my disciples, but be justly discarded and cashiered for not observing orders.” Thus several of the ancients understand it; if Peter will make himself wiser than his Master, and dispute the commands he ought to obey, he does in effect renounce his allegiance, and say, as they did, <i>What portion have we in David</i>, in the Son of David? And so shall his doom be, he shall have no part in him. Let him use no more manners than will do him good, for <i>to obey is better than sacrifice</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="1Sam.15.22" href="/passage/?search=1Sam.15.22">1 Sam. 15:22</a>. Or, (2.) As a declaration of the necessity of spiritual washing; and so I think it is to be understood: “<i>If I wash not</i> thy soul from the pollution of sin, <i>thou hast no part with me</i>, no interest in me, no communion with me, no benefit by me.” Note, All those, and those only, that are spiritually washed by Christ, have a part in Christ. [1.] To have a part in Christ, or with Christ, has all the happiness of a Christian bound up in it, to be <i>partakers of Christ</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="Heb.3.14" href="/passage/?search=Heb.3.14">Heb. 3:14</a>), to share in those inestimable privileges which result from a union with him and relation to him. It is that <i>good part</i> the having of which is the <i>one thing needful</i>. [2.] It is necessary to our having a part in Christ that he wash us. All those whom Christ owns and saves he justifies and sanctifies, and both are included in his washing them. We cannot partake of his glory if we partake not of his merit and righteousness, and of his Spirit and grace.</p>
<p class="tab-1">5. Peter’s more than submission, his earnest request, to be washed by Christ, <a class="bibleref" title="John.13.9" href="/passage/?search=John.13.9">John 13:9</a>. If this be the meaning of it, <i>Lord, wash not my feet only, but also my hands and my head</i>. How soon is Peter’s mind changed! When the mistake of his understanding was rectified, the corrupt resolution of his will was soon altered. Let us therefore not be peremptory in any resolve (except in our resolve to follow Christ), because we may soon see cause to retract it, but cautious in taking up a purpose we will be tenacious of. Observe,</p>
<p class="tab-1">(1.) How ready Peter is to recede from what he had said: “Lord, what a fool was I to speak such a hasty word!” Now that the washing of him appeared to be an act of Christ’s authority and grace he admits it; but disliked when it seemed only an act of humiliation. Note, [1.] Good men, when they see their error, will not be loth to recant it. [2.] Sooner or later, Christ will bring all to be of his mind.</p>
<p class="tab-1">(2.) How importunate he is for the purifying grace of the Lord Jesus, and the universal influence of it, even upon his hands and head. Note, A divorce from Christ, and an exclusion from having a part in him, is the most formidable evil in the eyes of all that are enlightened, for the fear of which they will be persuaded to any thing. And for fear of this we should be earnest with God in prayer, that he will wash us, will justify and sanctify us. “Lord, that I may not be cut off from thee, make me fit for thee, by the washing of regeneration. <i>Lord, wash not my feet only</i> from the gross pollutions that cleave to them, <i>but also my hands and my head</i> from the spots which they have contracted, and the undiscerned filth which proceeds by perspiration from the body itself.” Note, Those who truly desire to be sanctified desire to be sanctified throughout, and to have the whole man, with all its parts and powers, purified, <a class="bibleref" title="1Thess.5.23" href="/passage/?search=1Thess.5.23">1 Thess. 5:23</a>.</p>
<p class="tab-1">6. Christ’s further explication of this sign, as it represented spiritual washing.</p>
<p class="tab-1">(1.) With reference to his disciples that were faithful to him (<a class="bibleref" title="John.13.10" href="/passage/?search=John.13.10">John 13:10</a>): <i>He that is washed</i> all over in the bath (as was frequently practised in those countries), when he returns to his house, <i>needeth not save to wash his feet</i>, his hands and head having been washed, and he having only dirtied his feet in walking home. Peter had gone from one extreme to the other. At first he would not let Christ wash his feet; and now he overlooks what Christ had done for him in his baptism, and what was signified thereby, and cries out to have his hands and head washed. Now Christ directs him into the meaning; he must have his feet washed, but not his hands and head. [1.] See here what is the comfort and privilege of such as are in a justified state; they are washed by Christ, and are <i>clean every whit</i>, that is, they are graciously accepted of God, as if they were so; and, though they offend, yet they need not, upon their repentance, be again put into a justified state, for then should they often be baptized. The evidence of a justified state may be clouded, and the comfort of it suspended, when yet the charter of it is not vacated or taken away. Though we have occasion to repent daily, God’s gifts and callings are without repentance. The heart may be swept and garnished, and yet still remain the devil’s palace; but, if it be washed, it belongs to Christ, and he will not lose it. [2.] See what ought to be the daily care of those who through grace are in a justified state, and that is to wash their feet; to cleanse themselves from the guilt they contract daily through infirmity and inadvertence, by the renewed exercise of repentance, with a believing application of the virtue of Christ’s blood. We must also wash our feet by constant watchfulness against every thing that is defiling, for we must cleanse our way, and cleanse our feet <i>by taking heed thereto</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Ps.119.9" href="/passage/?search=Ps.119.9">Ps. 119:9</a>. The priests, when they were consecrated, were washed with water; and, though they did not need afterwards to be so washed all over, yet, whenever they went in to minister, they must wash their feet and hands at the laver, on pain of death, <a class="bibleref" title="Exod.30.19,Exod.30.20" href="/passage/?search=Exod.30.19,Exod.30.20"><span class="bibleref" title="Exod.30.19">Exod. 30:19</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Exod.30.20">20</span></a>. The provision made for our cleansing should not make us presumptuous, but the more cautious. <i>I have washed my feet, how shall I defile them</i>? From yesterday’s pardon, we should fetch an argument against this day’s temptation.</p>
<p class="tab-1">(2.) With reflection upon Judas: <i>And you are clean, but not all</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="John.13.10,John.13.11" href="/passage/?search=John.13.10,John.13.11"><span class="bibleref" title="John.13.10">John 13:10</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="John.13.11">11</span></a>. He pronounces his disciples clean, clean <i>through the word he had spoken to them</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="John.15.3" href="/passage/?search=John.15.3">John 15:3</a>. He washed them himself, and then said, <i>You are clean</i>; but he excepts Judas: <i>not all</i>; they were all baptized, even Judas, yet not all clean; many have the sign that have not the thing signified. Note, [1.] Even among those who are called disciples of Christ, and profess relation to him, there are some who are not clean, <a class="bibleref" title="Prov.30.12" href="/passage/?search=Prov.30.12">Prov. 30:12</a>. [2.] The Lord knows those that are his, and those that are not, <a class="bibleref" title="2Tim.2.19" href="/passage/?search=2Tim.2.19">2 Tim. 2:19</a>. The eye of Christ can separate between the precious and the vile, the clean and the unclean. [3.] When those that have called themselves disciples afterwards prove traitors, their apostasy at last is a certain evidence of their hypocrisy all along. [4.] Christ sees it necessary to let his disciples know that they are not all clean; that we may all be jealous over ourselves (<i>Isa. it I? Lord, is it I</i> that am among the clean, yet not clean?) and that, when hypocrites are discovered, it may be no surprise nor stumbling to us.</p>
<p class="tab-1">IV. Christ washed his disciples’ feet to set before us an example. This explication he gave of what he had done, when he had done it, <a class="bibleref" title="John.13.12-John.13.17" href="/passage/?search=John.13.12-John.13.17">John 13:12-17</a>. Observe,</p>
<p class="tab-1">1. With what solemnity he gave an account of the meaning of what he had done (<a class="bibleref" title="John.13.12" href="/passage/?search=John.13.12">John 13:12</a>): <i>After he had washed their feet</i>, he said, <i>Know you what I have done</i>?</p>
<p class="tab-1">(1.) He adjourned the explication till he had finished the transaction, [1.] To try their submission and implicit obedience. What he did they should not know till afterwards, that they might learn to acquiesce in his will when they could not give a reason for it. [2.] Because it was proper to finish the riddle before he unriddled it. Thus, as to his whole undertaking, when his sufferings were finished, when he had resumed the garments of his exalted state and was ready to sit down again, then he <i>opened the understandings of his disciples</i>, and poured out his Spirit, <a class="bibleref" title="Luke.24.45,Luke.24.46" href="/passage/?search=Luke.24.45,Luke.24.46"><span class="bibleref" title="Luke.24.45">Luke 24:45</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Luke.24.46">46</span></a>.</p>
<p class="tab-1">(2.) Before he explained it, he asked them if they could construe it: <i>Know you what I have done to you</i>? He put this question to them, not only to make them sensible of their ignorance, and the need they had to be instructed (as <a class="bibleref" title="Zech.4.5,Zech.4.13" href="/passage/?search=Zech.4.5,Zech.4.13"><span class="bibleref" title="Zech.4.5">Zech. 4:5</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Zech.4.13">13</span></a>, <i>Knowest thou not what these be? and I said, No, my Lord</i>), but to raise their desires and expectations of instruction: “I <i>would have you know</i>, and, if you will give attention, I will tell you.” Note, It is the will of Christ that sacramental signs should be explained, and that his people should be acquainted with the meaning of them; otherwise, though ever so significant, to those who know not the thing signified they are insignificant. Hence they are directed to ask, <i>What mean you by this service</i>? <a class="bibleref" title="Exod.12.26" href="/passage/?search=Exod.12.26">Exod. 12:26</a>.</p>
<p class="tab-1">2. Upon what he grounds that which he had to say (<a class="bibleref" title="John.13.13" href="/passage/?search=John.13.13">John 13:13</a>): “<i>You call me Master and Lord</i>, you give me those titles, in speaking of me, in speaking to me, and <i>you say well</i>, for <i>so I am</i>; you are in the relation of scholars to me, and I do the part of a master to you.” Note, (1.) Jesus Christ is our Master and Lord; he that is our Redeemer and Saviour is, in order to that, our Lord and Master. He is our Master, <b><i>didaskalos</i></b>—our teacher and instructor in all necessary truths and rules, as a prophet revealing to us the will of God. He is our Lord, <b><i>kyrios</i></b>—our ruler and owner, that has authority over us and propriety in us. (2.) It becomes the disciples of Christ to call him Master and Lord, not in compliment, but in reality; not by constraint, but with delight. Devout Mr. Herbert, when he mentioned the name of Christ, used to add, my Master; and thus expresses himself concerning it in one of his poems:</p>
<p class="tab-1">How sweetly doth my Master sound, my Master! As ambergris leaves a rich scent unto the taster, So do these words a sweet content, an oriental fragrancy, my Master.(3.) Our calling Christ Master and Lord is an obligation upon us to receive and observe the instruction he gives us. Christ would thus pre-engage their obedience to a command that was displeasing to flesh and blood. If Christ be our Master and Lord, be so by our own consent, and we have often called him so, we are bound in honour and honesty to be observant of him.</p>
<p class="tab-1">3. The lesson which he hereby taught: <i>You also ought to wash one another’s feet</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="John.13.14" href="/passage/?search=John.13.14">John 13:14</a>.</p>
<p class="tab-1">(1.) Some have understood this literally, and have thought these words amount to the institution of a standing ordinance in the church; that Christians should, in a solemn religious manner, <i>wash one another’s feet</i>, in token of their condescending love to one another. St. Ambrose took it so, and practised it in the church of Milan. St. Austin saith that those Christians who did not do it with their hands, yet (he hoped) did it with their hearts in humility; but he saith, It is much better to do it with the hands also, when there is occasion, as <a class="bibleref" title="1Tim.5.10" href="/passage/?search=1Tim.5.10">1 Tim. 5:10</a>. What Christ has done Christians should not disdain to do. Calvin saith that the pope, in the annual observance of this ceremony on Thursday in the passion week, is rather Christ’s ape than his follower, for the duty enjoined, in conformity to Christ, was <i>mutual: Wash one another’s feet</i>. And Jansenius saith, It is done, <i>Frigidè et dissimiliter—Frigidly, and unlike the primitive model</i>.</p>
<p class="tab-1">(2.) But doubtless it is to be understood figuratively; it is an instructive sign, but not sacramental, as the eucharist. This was a parable to the eye; and three things our Master hereby designed to teach us:—[1.] A humble condescension. We must learn of our Master to be <i>lowly in heart</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="Matt.11.29" href="/passage/?search=Matt.11.29">Matt. 11:29</a>), and walk with all lowliness; we must think meanly of ourselves and respectfully of our brethren, and deem nothing below us but sin; we must say of that which seems mean, but has a tendency to the glory of God and our brethren’s good, as David (<a class="bibleref" title="2Sam.6.22" href="/passage/?search=2Sam.6.22">2 Sam. 6:22</a>), <i>If this be to be vile, I will be yet more vile</i>. Christ had often taught his disciples humility, and they had forgotten the lesson; but now he teaches them in such a way as surely they could never forget. [2.] A condescension to be serviceable. To wash one another’s feet is to stoop to the meanest offices of love, for the real good and benefit one of another, as blessed Paul, who, though free from all, made himself <i>servant of all</i>; and the blessed Jesus, who <i>came not to be ministered unto, but to minister</i>. We must not grudge to take care and pains, and to spend time, and to diminish ourselves for the good of those to whom we are not under any particular obligations, even of our inferiors, and such as are not in a capacity of making us any requital. Washing the feet after travelling contributes both to the decency of the person and to his ease, so that to wash one another’s feet is to consult both the credit and the comfort one of another, to do what we can both to advance our brethren’s reputation and to make their minds easy. See <a class="bibleref" title="1Cor.10.24,Heb.6.10" href="/passage/?search=1Cor.10.24,Heb.6.10"><span class="bibleref" title="1Cor.10.24">1 Cor. 10:24</span>; <span class="bibleref" title="Heb.6.10">Heb. 6:10</span></a>. The duty is <i>mutual</i>; we must both accept help from our brethren and afford help to our brethren. [3.] A serviceableness to the sanctification one of another: <i>You ought to wash one another’s feet</i>, from the pollutions of sin. Austin takes it in this sense, and many others. We cannot satisfy for one another’s sins, this is peculiar to Christ, but we may help to purify one another from sin. We must in the first place wash ourselves; this charity must begin at home (<a class="bibleref" title="Matt.7.5" href="/passage/?search=Matt.7.5">Matt. 7:5</a>), but it must not end there; we must sorrow for the failings and follies of our brethren, much more for their gross pollutions (<a class="bibleref" title="1Cor.5.2" href="/passage/?search=1Cor.5.2">1 Cor. 5:2</a>), must wash our brethren’s polluted feet in tears. We must faithfully reprove them, and do what we can to bring them to repentance (<a class="bibleref" title="Gal.6.1" href="/passage/?search=Gal.6.1">Gal. 6:1</a>), and we must admonish them, to prevent their falling into the mire; this is washing their feet.</p>
<p class="tab-1">4. Here is the ratifying and enforcing of this command from the example of what Christ had now done: <i>If I your Lord and Master have</i> done it to you, you ought to do it <i>to one another</i>. He shows the cogency of this argument in two things:—</p>
<p class="tab-1">(1.) I am <i>your Master</i>, and you are my disciples, and therefore you ought to <i>learn of me</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="John.13.15" href="/passage/?search=John.13.15">John 13:15</a>); for in this, as in other things, <i>I have given you an example</i>, that <i>you should do</i> to others <i>as I have done</i> to you. Observe, [1.] What a good teacher Christ is. He teaches by example as well as doctrine, and for this end came into this world, and dwelt among us, that he might set us a copy of all those graces and duties which his holy religion teaches; and it is a copy without one false stroke. Hereby he made his own laws more intelligible and honourable. Christ is a commander like Gideon, who said to his soldiers, <i>Look on me, and do likewise</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="Judg.7.17" href="/passage/?search=Judg.7.17">Jdg. 7:17</a>); like Abimelech, who said, <i>What you have seen me do, make haste and do as I have done</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="Judg.9.48" href="/passage/?search=Judg.9.48">Jdg. 9:48</a>); and like Caesar, who called his soldiers, not <i>milites—soldiers</i>, but, <i>commilitones—fellow-soldiers</i>, and whose usual word was, not <i>Ite illue</i>, but <i>Venite huc</i>; not <i>Go</i>, but <i>Come</i>. [2.] What good scholars we must be. We must <i>do as he hath done</i>; for therefore he gave us a copy, that we should write after it, that we might be as he was in this world (<a class="bibleref" title="1John.4.17" href="/passage/?search=1John.4.17">1 John 4:17</a>), and walk <i>as he walked</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="1John.2.6" href="/passage/?search=1John.2.6">1 John 2:6</a>. Christ’s example here in is to be followed by ministers in particular, in whom the graces of humility and holy love should especially appear, and by the exercise thereof they effectually serve the interests of their Master and the ends of their ministry. When Christ sent his apostles abroad as his agents, it was with this charge, that they should not take state upon them, nor carry things with a high hand, but <i>become all things to all men</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="1Cor.9.22" href="/passage/?search=1Cor.9.22">1 Cor. 9:22</a>. What I have done to your dirty feet that do you to the polluted souls of sinners; <i>wash them</i>. Some who suppose this to have been done at the passover supper think it intimates a rule in admitting communicants to the Lord’s-supper, to see that they be first washed and cleansed by reformation and a blameless conversation, and then take them in to <i>compass God’s altar</i>. But all Christians likewise are here taught to condescend to each other in love, and to do it as Christ did it, unasked, unpaid; we must not be mercenary in the services of love, nor do them with reluctancy.</p>
<p class="tab-1">(2.) I am <i>your Master</i>, and you are my disciples, and therefore you cannot think it below you to do that, how mean soever it may seem, which you have seen me do, for (<a class="bibleref" title="John.13.16" href="/passage/?search=John.13.16">John 13:16</a>) <i>the servant is not greater than his Lord, neither he that is sent</i>, though sent with all the pomp and power of an ambassador, <i>greater than he that sent him</i>. Christ had urged this (<a class="bibleref" title="Matt.10.24,Matt.10.25" href="/passage/?search=Matt.10.24,Matt.10.25"><span class="bibleref" title="Matt.10.24">Matt. 10:24</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Matt.10.25">25</span></a>) as a reason why they should not think it strange if they suffered as he did; here he urges it as a reason why they should not think it much to humble themselves as he did. What he did not think a disparagement to him, they must not think a disparagement to them. Perhaps the disciples were inwardly disgusted at this precept of washing one another’s feet, as inconsistent with the dignity they expected shortly to be preferred to. To obviate such thoughts, Christ reminds them of their place as his servants; they were not better men than their Master, and what was consistent with his dignity was much more consistent with theirs. If he was humble and condescending, it ill became them to be proud and assuming. Note, [1.] We must take good heed to ourselves, lest Christ’s gracious condescensions to us, and advancements of us, through the corruption of nature occasion us to entertain high thoughts of ourselves or low thoughts of him. We need to be put in mind of this, that we are not <i>greater than our Lord</i>. [2.] Whatever our Master was pleased to condescend to in favour to us, we should much more condescend to in conformity to him. Christ, by humbling himself, has dignified humility, and put an honour upon it, and obliged his followers to think nothing below them but sin. We commonly say to those who disdain to do such or such a thing, As good as you have done it, and been never the worse thought of; and true indeed it is, if our Master has done it. When we see our Master serving, we cannot but see how ill it becomes us to be domineering.</p>