mh_parser/scraps/Luke_10_25-Luke_10_37.html

<p>We have here Christ’s discourse with a lawyer about some points of conscience, which we are all concerned to be rightly informed in and are so here from Christ though the questions were proposed with no good intention.</p>
<p class="tab-1">I. We are concerned to know what that good is which we should do in <i>this</i> life, in order to our attaining <i>eternal life</i>. A question to this purport was proposed to our Saviour by a <i>certain lawyer</i>, or <i>scribe</i>, only with a design to <i>try</i> him, not with a desire to be instructed by him, <a class="bibleref" title="Luke.10.25" href="/passage/?search=Luke.10.25">Luke 10:25</a>. The lawyer <i>stood up</i>, and <i>asked him, Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life</i>? If Christ had any thing peculiar to prescribe, by this question he would get it out of him, and perhaps expose him for it; if not, he would expose his doctrine as needless, since it would give no other direction for obtaining happiness than what they had already received; or, perhaps, he had no malicious design against Christ, as some of the scribes had, only he was willing to have a little talk with him, just as people go to church to hear what the minister will say. This was a good question: <i>What shall I do to inherit eternal life</i>? But it lost all its goodness when it was proposed with an ill design, or a very mean one. Note, It is not enough to speak of the things of God, and to enquire about them, but we must do it with a suitable concern. If we speak of <i>eternal life</i>, and <i>the way</i> to it, in a careless manner, merely as matter of discourse, especially as matter of dispute, we do but take the name of God in vain, as the lawyer here did. Now this question being started, observe,</p>
<p class="tab-1">1. How Christ turned him over to the divine law, and bade him follow the direction of that. Though he knew the thoughts and intents of his heart, he did not answer him according to the folly of that, but according to the wisdom and goodness of the question he asked. He answered him with a question: <i>What is written in the law? How readest thou</i>? <a class="bibleref" title="Luke.10.26" href="/passage/?search=Luke.10.26">Luke 10:26</a>. He came to catechize Christ, and to know him; but Christ will catechize him, and make him know himself. He talks to him as a lawyer, as one conversant in the law: the studies of his profession would inform him; let him practise according to his knowledge, and he should not come short of <i>eternal life</i>. Note, It will be of great use to us, in our way to heaven, to consider <i>what is written in the law</i>, and <i>what we read</i> there. We must have recourse to our bibles, to the law, as it is now in the hand of Christ and walk in the way that is shown us there. It is a great mercy that we have the law <i>written</i>, that we have it thereby reduced to certainty, and that thereby it is capable of spreading the <i>further</i>, and lasting the <i>longer</i>. Having it <i>written</i>, it is our duty to read it, to read it with understanding, and to treasure up what we read, so that when there is occasion, we may be able to tell <i>what is written in the law</i>, and <i>how we read</i>. To this we must appeal; by this we must try doctrines and end disputes; this must be our oracle, our touchstone, our rule, our guide. What is written in the law? How do we read? if there be light in us, it will have regard to this light.</p>
<p class="tab-1">2. What a good account he gave of the law, of the principal commandments of the law, to the observance of which we must bind ourselves if we would inherit eternal life. He did not, like a Pharisee, refer himself to the tradition of the elders, but, like a good textuary, fastened upon the two first and great commandments of the law, as those which he thought must be most strictly observed in order to the obtaining of <i>eternal life</i>, and which included all the rest, <a class="bibleref" title="Luke.10.27" href="/passage/?search=Luke.10.27">Luke 10:27</a>. (1.) We must <i>love God with all our hearts</i>, must look upon him as the best of beings, in himself most amiable, and infinitely perfect and excellent; as one whom we lie under the greatest obligations to, both in gratitude and interest. We must prize him, and value ourselves by our elation to him; must please ourselves in him, and devote ourselves entirely to him. Our love to him must be sincere, hearty, and fervent; it must be a superlative love, a love that is as strong as death, but an intelligent love, and such as we can give a good account of the grounds and reasons of. It must be an <i>entire</i> love; he must have our <i>whole</i> souls, and must be served with <i>all that is within us</i>. We must love nothing <i>besides him</i>, but what we love <i>for him</i> and in subordination to him. (2.) We must love our neighbours as <i>ourselves</i>, which we shall easily do, if we, as we ought to do, love God <i>better than ourselves</i>. We must wish well to all and ill to none; must do all the good we can in the world and no hurt, and must fix it as a rule to ourselves to do to others as we would they should do to us; and this is to love our neighbour <i>as ourselves</i>.</p>
<p class="tab-1">3. Christ’s approbation of what he said, <a class="bibleref" title="Luke.10.28" href="/passage/?search=Luke.10.28">Luke 10:28</a>. Though he came to tempt him, yet what he said that was good Christ commended: <i>Thou hast answered right</i>. Christ himself fastened upon these as the two great commandments of the law (<a class="bibleref" title="Matt.22.37" href="/passage/?search=Matt.22.37">Matt. 22:37</a>): both sides agreed in this. Those who do well shall have praise of the same, and so should those have that speak well. So far is right; but he hardest part of this work yet remains: “<i>This do, and thou shalt live</i>; thou shalt <i>inherit eternal life</i>.”</p>
<p class="tab-1">4. His care to avoid the conviction which was now ready to fasten upon him. When Christ said, <i>This do, and thou shalt live</i>, he began to be aware that Christ intended to draw from him an acknowledgment that he <i>had not done this</i>, and therefore an enquiry what he should do, which way he should look, to get his sins pardoned; an acknowledgment also that he <i>could not do this</i> perfectly for the future by any strength of his own, and therefore an enquiry which way he might fetch in strength to enable him to do it: but he was <i>willing to justify himself</i>, and therefore cared not for carrying on that discourse, but saith, in effect, as another did (<a class="bibleref" title="Matt.19.20" href="/passage/?search=Matt.19.20">Matt. 19:20</a>), <i>All these things have I kept from my youth up</i>. Note, Many ask good questions with a design rather to <i>justify themselves</i> than to <i>inform themselves</i>, rather proudly to show what is good in them than humbly to see what is bad in them.</p>
<p class="tab-1">II. We are concerned to know who is our neighbour, whom by the second great commandment we are obliged to love. This is another of this lawyer’s queries, which he started only that he might <i>drop</i> the former, lest Christ should have forced him, in the prosecution of it, to <i>condemn himself</i>, when he was resolved to <i>justify</i> himself. As to loving God, he was willing to say no more of it; but, as to his <i>neighbour</i>, he was sure that there he had come up to the rule, for he had always been very kind and respectful to all about him. Now observe,</p>
<p class="tab-1">1. What was the corrupt notion of the Jewish teachers in this matter. Dr. Lightfoot quotes their own words to this purport: “Where he saith, <i>Thou shalt love thy neighbour, he excepts all Gentiles</i>, for they are not <i>our neighbours</i>, but those only that are of our own nation and religion.” They would not put an Israelite to death for killing a Gentile, for he was not his <i>neighbour</i>: they indeed say that they ought not to kill a Gentile whom they were not at war with; but, if they saw a Gentile in <i>danger of death</i>, they thought themselves under no obligation to help to <i>save his life</i>. Such wicked inferences did they draw from that holy covenant of peculiarity by which God had distinguished them, and by abusing it thus they had forfeited it; God justly took the forfeiture, and transferred covenant-favours to the Gentile world, to whom they brutishly denied common favours.</p>
<p class="tab-1">2. How Christ corrected this inhuman notion, and showed, by a parable, that whomsoever we <i>have need</i> to receive kindness <i>from</i>, and <i>find ready</i> to show us the kindness <i>we need</i>, we cannot but look upon as <i>our neighbour</i>; and therefore ought to look upon all those as such who need our kindness, and to show them kindness accordingly, though they be not of our own nation and religion. Now observe,</p>
<p class="tab-1">(1.) The parable itself, which represents to us a poor Jew in distressed circumstances, succoured and relieved by a good Samaritan. Let us see here,</p>
<p class="tab-1">[1.] How he was <i>abused</i> by his <i>enemies</i>. The honest man was traveling peaceably upon his lawful business in the road, and it was a great road that led from Jerusalem to Jericho, <a class="bibleref" title="Luke.10.30" href="/passage/?search=Luke.10.30">Luke 10:30</a>. The mentioning of those places intimates that it was matter of fact, and not a parable; probably it happened lately, just as it is here related. The occurrences of Providence would yield us many good instructions, if we would carefully observe and improve them, and would be equivalent to parables framed on purpose for instruction, and be more <i>affecting</i>. This poor man <i>fell among thieves</i>. Whether they were Arabians, plunderers, that lived by spoil, or some profligate wretches of his own nation, or some of the Roman soldiers, who, notwithstanding the strict discipline of their army, did this villany, does not appear; but they were very <i>barbarous</i>; they not only took his money, but stripped him of his clothes, and, that he might not be able to pursue them, or only to gratify a cruel disposition (for otherwise <i>what profit was there in his blood</i>?) they <i>wounded him</i>, and left him <i>half dead</i>, ready to die of his wounds. We may here conceive a just indignation at <i>highwaymen</i>, that have divested themselves of all humanity, and are as natural brute beasts, beasts of prey, made to be <i>taken and destroyed</i>; and at the same time we cannot but think with compassion on those that fall into the hands of such wicked and unreasonable men, and be ready, when it is in our power, to help them. What reason have we to thank God for our preservation from perils by robbers!</p>
<p class="tab-1">[2.] How he was <i>slighted</i> by those who should have been his friends, who were not only men of his own nation and religion, but one a priest and the other a Levite, men of a public character and station; nay, they were men of professed sanctity, whose offices obliged them to tenderness and compassion (<a class="bibleref" title="Heb.5.2" href="/passage/?search=Heb.5.2">Heb. 5:2</a>), who ought to have taught others their duty in such a case as this, which was to <i>deliver them that were drawn unto death</i>; yet they would not themselves do it. Dr. Lightfoot tells us that many of the courses of the priests had their residence in Jericho, and thence came up to Jerusalem, when it was their turn to officiate there, and so back again, which occasioned abundance of <i>passing</i> and <i>repassing</i> of priests that way, and Levites their attendants. They came <i>this way</i>, and saw the poor wounded man. It is probable that they heard his groans, and could not but perceive that if he were not helped he must quickly perish. The Levite not only saw him, but <i>came and looked on him</i> <a class="bibleref" title="Luke.10.32" href="/passage/?search=Luke.10.32">Luke 10:32</a>. But they <i>passed by on the other side</i>; when they saw his case, they got as far off him as ever they could, as if they would have had a pretence to say, <i>Behold, we knew it not</i>. It is sad when those who should be examples of charity are prodigies of cruelty, and when those who should by displaying the mercies of God, open the bowels of compassion in others, shut up their own.</p>
<p class="tab-1">[3.] How he was <i>succoured</i> and <i>relieved</i> by a <i>stranger</i>, a <i>certain Samaritan</i>, of that nation which of all others the Jews most despised and detested and would have no dealings with. This man had some humanity in him, <a class="bibleref" title="Luke.10.33" href="/passage/?search=Luke.10.33">Luke 10:33</a>. The priest had his heart hardened against one of <i>his own people</i>, but the Samaritan had his opened towards one of <i>another</i> people. <i>When he saw him he had compassion on him</i>, and never took into consideration what country he was of. Though he was a Jew, he was a man, and a man in <i>misery</i>, and the Samaritan has learned to honour all men; he knows not how soon this poor man’s case may be his own, and therefore pities him, as he himself would desire and expect to be pitied in the like case. That such great love should be found in a Samaritan was perhaps thought as wonderful as that great faith which Christ admired in a Roman, and in a woman of Canaan; but really it was not so, for pity is the work of a man, but faith is the work of divine <i>grace</i>. The <i>compassion</i> of this Samaritan was not an idle compassion; he did not think it enough to say, “Be healed, be helped” (<a class="bibleref" title="Jas.2.16" href="/passage/?search=Jas.2.16">Jas. 2:16</a>); but, when he <i>drew out his soul</i>, he <i>reached forth his hand</i> also to this poor <i>needy</i> creature, <a class="bibleref" title="Isa.58.7,Prov.31.20" href="/passage/?search=Isa.58.7,Prov.31.20"><span class="bibleref" title="Isa.58.7">Isa. 58:7</span>; <span class="bibleref" title="Prov.31.20">Prov. 31:20</span></a>. See how friendly this good Samaritan was. <i>First</i>, He <i>went to</i> the poor man, whom the priest and Levite kept at a distance from; he enquired, no doubt, how he came into this deplorable condition, and condoled with him. <i>Secondly</i>, He did the surgeon’s part, for want of a better. He <i>bound up his wounds</i>, making use of his own linen, it is likely, for that purpose; and poured <i>in oil and wine</i>, which perhaps he had with him; wine to wash the wound, and oil to mollify it, and close it up. He did all he could to ease the pain, and prevent the peril, of his wounds, as one whose heart bled with him. <i>Thirdly</i>, He <i>set him on his own beast</i>, and went on foot himself, and <i>brought him to an inn</i>. A great mercy it is to have inns upon the road, where we may be furnished for our money with all the conveniences for food and rest. Perhaps the Samaritan, if he had not met with this hindrance, would have got that night to his journey’s end; but, in compassion to that poor man, he takes up short at an inn. Some think that the priest and Levite pretended they could not stay to help the poor man, because they were in haste to go and attend the temple-service at Jerusalem. We suppose the Samaritan went upon business; but he understood that both his own business and God’s sacrifice too must give place to such an act of mercy as this. <i>Fourthly</i>, He <i>took care of him</i> in the inn, got him to bed, had food for him that was proper, and due attendance, and, it may be, prayed with him. Nay, <i>Fifthly</i>, As if he had been his own child, or one he was obliged to look after, when he left him next morning, he left money with the landlord, to be laid out for his use, and passed his word for what he should spend more. <i>Twopence</i> of their money was about fifteen pence of ours, which, according to the rate of things then, would go a great way; however, here it was an earnest of satisfaction to the full of all demands. All this was kind and generous, and as much as one could have expected from a friend or a brother; and yet here it is done by a stranger and foreigner.</p>
<p class="tab-1">Now this parable is applicable to another purpose than that for which it was intended; and does excellently set forth the kindness and love of God our Saviour towards sinful miserable man. We were like this poor distressed traveller. Satan, our enemy, had <i>robbed</i> us, <i>stripped</i> us, <i>wounded</i> us; such is the mischief that sin had done us. We were by nature more than <i>half dead</i>, twice dead, in trespasses and sins; utterly unable to help ourselves, for we were without strength. The law of Moses, like the priest and Levite, the ministers of the law, <i>looks upon us</i>, but has no compassion on us, gives us no relief, <i>passes by on the other side</i>, as having neither pity nor power to help us; but then comes the blessed Jesus, that good Samaritan (and they said of him, by way of reproach, <i>he is a Samaritan</i>), he has compassion on us, he binds up our bleeding wounds (<a class="bibleref" title="Ps.147.3,Isa.61.1" href="/passage/?search=Ps.147.3,Isa.61.1"><span class="bibleref" title="Ps.147.3">Ps. 147:3</span>; <span class="bibleref" title="Isa.61.1">Isa. 61:1</span></a>), pours in, not <i>oil and wine</i>, but that which is infinitely more precious, <i>his own blood</i>. He takes care of us, and bids us put all the expenses of our cure upon his account; and all this though he was none of us, till he was pleased by his voluntary condescension to make himself so, but infinitely above us. This magnifies the riches of his love, and obliges us all to say, “How much are we indebted, and what shall we render?”</p>
<p class="tab-1">(2.) The application of the parable. [1.] The truth contained in it is extorted from the lawyer’s own mouth. “Now tell me,” saith Christ, “<i>which of these three was neighbour to him that fell among thieves</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="Luke.10.36" href="/passage/?search=Luke.10.36">Luke 10:36</a>), the priest, the Levite, or the Samaritan? Which of these did the neighbour’s part?” To this the lawyer would not answer, as he ought to have done, “Doubtless, the Samaritan was;” but, “<i>He that showed mercy on him</i>; doubtless, he was a good neighbour to him, and very neighbourly, and I cannot but say that it was a good work thus to save an honest Jew from perishing.” [2.] The duty inferred from it is pressed home upon the lawyer’s own conscience: <i>Go, and do thou likewise</i>. The duty of relations is mutual and reciprocal; the titles of friends, brethren, neighbours, are, as Grotius here speaks <b><i>ton pros ti</i></b>—<i>equally binding on both sides</i>: if one side be bound, the other cannot be loose, as is agreed in all contracts. If a Samaritan does well that helps a distressed Jew, certainly a Jew does not well if he refuses in like manner to help a distressed Samaritan. <i>Petimusque damusque vicissim—These kind offices are to be reciprocated</i>. “And therefore <i>go thou</i> and do as the Samaritan did, whenever occasion offers: show mercy to those that need thy help, and do it freely, and with concern and compassion, though they be not of thy own nation and thy own profession, or of thy own opinion and communion in religion. Let thy charity be thus extensive, before thou boastest of having conformed thyself to that great commandment of <i>loving thy neighbour</i>.” This lawyer valued himself much upon his learning and his knowledge of the laws, and in that he thought to have puzzled Christ himself; but Christ sends him to school to a Samaritan, to learn his duty: “Go, and do like him.” Note, It is the duty of every one of us, in our places, and according to our ability, to succour, help, and relieve all that are in distress and necessity, and of lawyers particularly; and herein we must study to excel many that are proud of their being priests and Levites.</p>