8 lines
22 KiB
HTML
8 lines
22 KiB
HTML
|
<p>Two things, two evil things, both Judah and Ephraim are here charged with, and justly accused of:—</p>
|
|||
|
|
<p class="tab-1">I. That they were not firm to their own convictions, but were unsteady, <i>unstable as water</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Hos.6.4,Hos.6.5" href="/passage/?search=Hos.6.4,Hos.6.5"><span class="bibleref" title="Hos.6.4">Hos. 6:4</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Hos.6.5">5</span></a>. <i>O Ephraim! what shall I do unto thee? O Judah! what shall I do unto thee</i>? This is a strange expression. Can Infinite Wisdom be at a loss what to do? Can it be nonplussed, or put upon taking new measures? By no means; but God speaks after the manner of men, to show how absurd and unreasonable they were, and how just his proceedings against them were. Let them not complain of him as harsh and severe in tearing them, and smiting them, as he has done; for what else should he do? What other course could he take with them? God had tried various methods with them (<i>What could have been done more to his vineyard than he had done</i>? <a class="bibleref" title="Isa.5.4" href="/passage/?search=Isa.5.4">Isa. 5:4</a>), and very loth he was to let things go to extremity; he reasons with himself (as <a class="bibleref" title="Hos.11.9" href="/passage/?search=Hos.11.9">Hos. 11:9</a>), <i>How shall I give thee up, Ephraim</i>? God would have done them good, but they were not qualified for it: “<i>What shall I do unto thee</i>? What else can I do but cast thee off, when I cannot in honour save thee?” Note, God never destroys sinners till he sees there is no other way with them. See here, 1. What their conduct was towards God: <i>Their goodness</i>, or <i>kindness</i>, was <i>as the morning cloud</i>. Some understand it of their kindness to themselves and their own souls, in their repentance; it is indeed mercy to ourselves to repent of our sins, but they soon retracted that kindness to themselves, undid it again, and wronged their own souls as much as ever. But it is rather to be taken for their piety and religion; what good appeared in them sometimes, it soon vanished and disappeared again, <i>as the morning cloud and the early dew</i>. Such was the goodness of Israel in Jehu’s time, and of Judah in Hezekiah’s and Josiah’s time; it was soon gone. In time of drought the <i>morning-cloud</i> promises rain, and the <i>early dew</i> is some present refreshment to the earth; but the cloud is dispersed (and hypocrites are compared to <i>clouds without water</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Jude.1.12" href="/passage/?search=Jude.1.12">Jude 1:12</a>) and the dew does not soak into the ground, but is drawn back again into the air, and the earth is parched still. What shall he do with them? Shall he accept their goodness? No, for it <i>passes away</i>; and <i>factum non dicitur quod non perseverat—that which does not continue can scarcely be said to be done</i>. Note, That goodness will never be either pleasing to God or profitable to ourselves which is as the morning cloud and the early dew. When men promise fair and do not perform, when they begin well in religion and do not hold on, when they leave their first love and their first works, or, though they do not quite cast off religion, are yet unsteady, uneven, and inconstant in it, then is their <i>goodness as the morning cloud and the early dew</i>. 2. What course God had taken with them (<a class="bibleref" title="Hos.6.5" href="/passage/?search=Hos.6.5">Hos. 6:5</a>): “<i>Therefore</i>, because they were so rough and ill-shapen, <i>I have hewn them by the prophets</i>, as timber or stone is hewn for use; <i>I have slain them by the words of my mouth</i>.” What the prophets did was done by the word of God in their mouths, which never returned void. By it they thought themselves slain, were ready to say that the prophets killed them, or cut them to the heart when they dealt faithfully with them. (1.) The prophets hewed them by convictions of sin, endeavouring to cut off their transgressions from them. They were uneven in religion (<a class="bibleref" title="Hos.6.4" href="/passage/?search=Hos.6.4">Hos. 6:4</a>), therefore God hewed them. The hearts of sinners are no
|
|||
|
|
<p class="tab-1">II. That they were not faithful to God’s covenant with them, <a class="bibleref" title="Hos.6.6,Hos.6.7" href="/passage/?search=Hos.6.6,Hos.6.7"><span class="bibleref" title="Hos.6.6">Hos. 6:6</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Hos.6.7">7</span></a>. Here observe,</p>
|
|||
|
|
<p class="tab-1">1. What the covenant was that God made with them, and upon what terms they should obtain his favour and be accepted of him (<a class="bibleref" title="Hos.6.6" href="/passage/?search=Hos.6.6">Hos. 6:6</a>): <i>I desired mercy and not sacrifice</i> (that is, rather than sacrifice), and insisted upon <i>the knowledge of God more than</i> upon <i>burnt-offerings. Mercy</i> here is the same word which in <a class="bibleref" title="Hos.6.4" href="/passage/?search=Hos.6.4">Hos. 6:4</a> is rendered <i>goodness—chesed—piety, sanctity</i>; it is put for all practical religion; it is the same with <i>charity</i> in the New Testament, the reigning love of God and our neighbour, and this accompanied with and flowing from the <i>knowledge of God</i>, as he has revealed himself in his word, a firm belief that he is, and is the <i>rewarder of those that diligently seek him</i>, a good affection to divine things guided by a good judgment, which cannot but produce a very good conversation; this is that which God by his covenant requires, and <i>not sacrifice and offering</i>. This is fully explained, <a class="bibleref" title="Jer.7.22,Jer.7.23" href="/passage/?search=Jer.7.22,Jer.7.23"><span class="bibleref" title="Jer.7.22">Jer. 7:22</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Jer.7.23">23</span></a>. <i>I spoke not to your fathers concerning burnt-offerings</i> (that was the smallest of the matters I spoke to them of, and on which the least stress was laid), but <i>this I said, Obey my voice</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Mic.6.6-Mic.6.8" href="/passage/?search=Mic.6.6-Mic.6.8">Mic. 6:6-8</a>. To love God and our neighbour is <i>better than all burnt offering and sacrifice</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Mark.12.33,Ps.51.16,Ps.51.17" href="/passage/?search=Mark.12.33,Ps.51.16,Ps.51.17"><span class="bibleref" title="Mark.12.33">Mark 12:33</span>; <span class="bibleref" title="Ps.51.16">Ps. 51:16</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Ps.51.17">17</span></a>. Not but that sacrifice and offering were required, and to be paid, and had their use, and, when they were accompanied with mercy and the knowledge of God, were acceptable to him, but, without them, God regarded them not, he despised them, <a class="bibleref" title="Isa.1.10,Isa.1.11" href="/passage/?search=Isa.1.10,Isa.1.11"><span class="bibleref" title="Isa.1.10">Isa. 1:10</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Isa.1.11">11</span></a>. Perhaps this is mentioned here to show a difference between the God whom they deserted and the gods whom they went over to. The true God aimed at nothing but that they should be good men, and live good lives for their own good, and the ceremony of honouring him with sacrifices was one of the smallest matters of his law; whereas the false gods required that only; let their priests and altars be regaled with sacrifices and offerings, and the people might live as they listed. What fools were those then that left a God who aimed at giving his worshippers a new nature, for gods who aimed at nothing but making themselves a new name! It is mentioned likewise to show that God’s controversy with them was not for the omission of sacrifices (<i>I will not reprove thee for them</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Ps.50.8" href="/passage/?search=Ps.50.8">Ps. 50:8</a>), but because there was no <i>justice, nor mercy</i>, nor <i>knowledge of God</i>, among them (<a class="bibleref" title="Hos.4.1" href="/passage/?search=Hos.4.1">Hos. 4:1</a>), and to teach us all that the <i>power of godliness</i> is the main thing God looks at and requires, and without it the <i>form of godliness</i> is of no avail. Serious piety in the heart and life is the <i>one thing needful</i>, and, separate from that, the performances of devotion, though ever so plausible, ever so costly, are of no account. Our Saviour quotes this to show that moral duties are to be preferred before rituals whenever they come in competition, and to justify himself in <i>eating with publicans and sinners</i>, because it was in mercy to the souls of men, and in healing on the sabbath day, becaus
|
|||
|
|
<p class="tab-1">2. How little they had regarded this covenant, though it was so well ordered in all things, though they, and not God, would be the gainers by it. See here what came of it.</p>
|
|||
|
|
<p class="tab-1">(1.) In general, they broke with God, and proved unfaithful; there were <i>good things committed</i> to them to keep, the jewels of mercy and piety, and the knowledge of God, in the cabinet of sacrifice and burnt-offering, but they betrayed their trust, kept the cabinet, but pawned the jewels for the gratification of a base lust, and this is that for which God has justly a quarrel with them (<a class="bibleref" title="Hos.6.7" href="/passage/?search=Hos.6.7">Hos. 6:7</a>): <i>They, like men, have transgressed the covenant</i>, that covenant which God made with them; they have broken the conditions of it, and so forfeited the benefit of it. By casting off mercy and the knowledge of God, and other instances of disobedience, [1.] They had contracted the guilt of perjury and covenant-breaking; they were like men that transgress a covenant by which they had solemnly bound themselves, which is a thing that all the world cries out shame on; men that have done so deserve not again to be valued, or trusted, or dealt with. “<i>There</i>, in that thing, <i>they have dealt treacherously against me</i>; they have been perfidious, base, and false children, in whom is no faith, though I depended upon their being <i>children that would not lie</i>.” [2.] In this they had but acted like themselves, <i>like men</i>, who are generally false and fickle, and in whose nature (their corrupt nature) it is to deal treacherously; <i>all men are liars</i>, and they are like the rest of that degenerate race, <i>all gone aside</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Ps.14.2,Ps.14.3" href="/passage/?search=Ps.14.2,Ps.14.3"><span class="bibleref" title="Ps.14.2">Ps. 14:2</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Ps.14.3">3</span></a>. They have <i>transgressed the covenant</i> like <i>men</i> (like the Gentiles that transgressed the covenant of nature), like <i>mean men</i> (the word here used is sometimes put for <i>men of low degree</i>); they have dealt deceitfully, like base men that have no sense of honour. [3.] Herein they trod in the steps of our first parents: <i>They, like Adam, have transgressed the covenant</i> (so it might very well be read); as he transgressed the covenant of innocency, so they transgressed the covenant of grace, so treacherously, so foolishly; <i>there</i> in paradise he violated his engagements to God, and there in Canaan, another paradise, they violated their engagements. And by their treacherous dealing they, like Adam, have ruined themselves and theirs. Note, Sin is so much the worse the more there is in it of the <i>similitude of Adam’s transgression</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Rom.5.14" href="/passage/?search=Rom.5.14">Rom. 5:14</a>. [4.] Low thoughts of God and of his authority and favour were at the bottom of all this; for so some read it: <i>They have transgressed the covenant, as of a man</i>, as if it had been but the covenant of a man, that stood upon even ground with them, as if the commands of the covenant were but like those of a man like themselves, and the kindness conveyed by it no more valuable than that of a man. There is something sacred and binding in <i>a man’s covenant</i> (as the apostle shows, <a class="bibleref" title="Gal.3.15" href="/passage/?search=Gal.3.15">Gal. 3:15</a>), but much more in the covenant of God, which yet they made small account of; and <i>there</i> in that covenant they <i>dealt treacherously</i>, promised fair, but performed nothing. Dealing treacherously with God is here called dealing treacherously against him, for it is both an affront and an opposition. Deserters are traitors, and will be so treated; the revolting heart is a rebellious heart.</p>
|
|||
|
|
<p class="tab-1">(2.) Some particular instances of their treachery are here given: <i>There they dealt treacherously</i>, that is, in the places hereafter named [1.] Look on the other side Jordan, to the country which lay most exposed to the insults of the neighbouring nations, and where therefore the people were concerned to keep themselves under the divine protection, and yet there you will find the most daring provocations of the divine Majesty, <a class="bibleref" title="Hos.6.8" href="/passage/?search=Hos.6.8">Hos. 6:8</a>. Gilead, which lay in the lot of Gad and the half tribe of Manasseh, was <i>a city of the workers of iniquity</i>. Wickedness was the trade that was driven there; the country was called <i>Gilead</i>, but it was all called a <i>city</i>, because they were all as it were incorporated in one society of rebels against God 1a53 . Or (as most think) Ramoth Gilead is the city here meant, one of the three cities of refuge on the other side Jordan, and a Levites’ city; the inhabitants of it, though of the sacred tribe, were <i>workers of iniquity</i>, contrived it, and practised it. Note, It is bad indeed when a Levites’ city is <i>a city of those that work iniquity</i>, when those that are to preach good doctrine live bad lives. Particularly it is <i>polluted with blood</i>, as if that were a sin which the wicked Levites were in a special manner guilty of. In popish countries the clergy are observed to be the most bloody persecutors. Or, as it was a <i>city of refuge</i>, by abusing the power it had to judge of murders it became <i>polluted with blood</i>. They would, for a bribe, protect those that were guilty of wilful murder, whom they ought to have put to death, and would deliver those to the avenger of blood who were guilty but of chance-medley, if they were poor and had nothing to give them; and both these ways they were <i>polluted with blood</i>. Note, Blood defiles the land where it is shed, and where no inquisition is made or no vengeance taken for it. See how the best institutions, that are ever so well designed to keep the balance even between justice and mercy, are capable of being abused and perverted to the manifest prejudice and violation of both. [2.] Look among those whose business it was to minister in holy things, and they were as bad as the worst and as vile as the vilest (<a class="bibleref" title="Hos.6.9" href="/passage/?search=Hos.6.9">Hos. 6:9</a>): <i>The company of priests</i> are so, not here and there one that is the scandal of his order, but the whole order and body of them, the <i>priests</i> go all one way <i>by consent, with one shoulder</i> (as the word is), one and all; and they make one another worse, more daring, and fierce, and impudent, in sin, more crafty and more cruel. A <i>company of priests</i> will say and do that in conspiracy which none of them would dare to say or do singly. The <i>companies of priests</i> were as <i>troops of robbers</i>, as <i>banditti</i>, or gangs of highwaymen, that cut men’s throats to get their money. <i>First</i>, They were cruel and blood-thirsty. They <i>murder</i> those that they have a pique against, or that stand in their way; nothing less will satisfy them. <i>Secondly</i>, They were cunning. They <i>laid wait</i> for men, that they might have a fair opportunity to compass their mischievous malicious designs; thus the company of priests laid wait for Christ to take him, saying, <i>Not on the feast-day. Thirdly</i>, They were concurring as one man: <i>They murder in the way</i>; in the highway, where travellers should be safe, there <i>they murder by consent</i>, aiding and abetting one another in it. See how unanimous wicked people are in doing mischief; and should not good people be so then in doing good? <i>They murder in the way to Shechem</i> (so the margin reads it, as a proper name) such as were going to Jerusalem (for that way Shechem lay) to worship. Or <i>in the way to Shechem</i> (some think) means in the same manner that their father Levi, with Simeon his brother, murdered the Shechemites (<a class="bibleref
|