5 lines
12 KiB
HTML
5 lines
12 KiB
HTML
|
<p>Here is, I. The great sin that Nadab and Abihu were guilty of: and a great sin we must call it, how little soever it appears in our eye, because it is evident by the punishment of it that it was highly provoking to the God of heaven, whose judgment, we are sure, is according to truth. But what was their sin? All the account here given of it is that they <i>offered strange fire before the Lord, which he commanded them not</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="Lev.10.1" href="/passage/?search=Lev.10.1">Lev. 10:1</a>), and the same <a class="bibleref" title="Num.3.4" href="/passage/?search=Num.3.4">Num. 3:4</a>. 1. It does not appear the they had any orders to burn incense at all at this time. It is true their consecration was completed the day before, and it was part of their work, as priests, to serve at the altar of incense; but, it should seem, the whole service of this solemn day of inauguration was to be performed by Aaron himself, for he <i>slew the sacrifices</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="Lev.9.8,Lev.9.15,Lev.9.18" href="/passage/?search=Lev.9.8,Lev.9.15,Lev.9.18"><span class="bibleref" title="Lev.9.8">Lev. 9:8</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Lev.9.15">15</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Lev.9.18">18</span></a>), and his sons were only to attend him (<a class="bibleref" title="Lev.10.9,Lev.10.12,Lev.10.18" href="/passage/?search=Lev.10.9,Lev.10.12,Lev.10.18"><span class="bibleref" title="Lev.10.9">Lev. 10:9</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Lev.10.12">12</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Lev.10.18">18</span></a>); therefore Moses and Aaron only <i>went into the tabernacle</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Lev.9.23" href="/passage/?search=Lev.9.23">Lev. 9:23</a>. But Nadab and Abihu were so proud of the honour they were newly advanced to, and so ambitious of doing the highest and most honourable part of their work immediately, that though the service of this day was extraordinary, and done by particular direction from Moses, yet without receiving orders, or so much as asking leave from him, they took their censers, and they would enter into the tabernacle, at the door of which they thought they had attended long enough, and would burn incense. And then their <i>offering strange fire</i> is the same with <i>offering strange incense</i>, which is expressly forbidden, <a class="bibleref" title="Exod.30.9" href="/passage/?search=Exod.30.9">Exod. 30:9</a>. Moses, we may suppose, had the custody of the incense which was prepared for this purpose (<a class="bibleref" title="Exod.39.38" href="/passage/?search=Exod.39.38">Exod. 39:38</a>), and they, doing this without his leave, had none of the incense which should have been offered, but common incense, so that the smoke of their incense came from a <i>strange fire</i>. God had indeed required the priests to burn incense, but, at this time, it was what he commanded them not; and so their crime was like that of Uzziah the king, <a class="bibleref" title="2Chr.26.16" href="/passage/?search=2Chr.26.16">2 Chron. 26:16</a>. The priests were to burn incense only when <i>it was their lot</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="Luke.1.9" href="/passage/?search=Luke.1.9">Luke 1:9</a>), and, at this time, it was not theirs. 2. Presuming thus to burn incense of their own without order, no marvel that they made a further blunder, and instead of taking of the fire from the altar, which was newly kindled from before the Lord and which henceforward must be used in offering both sacrifice and incense (<a class="bibleref" title="Rev.8.5" href="/passage/?search=Rev.8.5">Rev. 8:5</a>), they took common fire, probably from that with which the flesh of the peace-offerings was boiled, and this they made use of in burning incense; not being holy fire, it is called <i>strange fire</i>; and, though not expressly forbidden, it was crime enough that God <i>commanded it not</i>. For (as bishop Hall well observes here) “It is a dangerous thing, in the service of God, to decline from his own institutions; we have to do with a God who is wise to prescribe his own worship, just to require what he
|
|||
|
|
<p class="tab-1">II. The dreadful punishment of this sin: <i>There went out fire from the Lord, and devoured them</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Lev.10.2" href="/passage/?search=Lev.10.2">Lev. 10:2</a>. This fire which consumed the sacrifices came the same way with that which had consumed the sacrifices (<a class="bibleref" title="Lev.9.24" href="/passage/?search=Lev.9.24">Lev. 9:24</a>), which showed what justice would have done to all the guilty people if infinite mercy had not found and accepted a ransom; and, if that fire struck such an awe upon the people, much more would this.</p>
|
|||
|
|
<p class="tab-1">1. Observe the severity of their punishment. (1.) They <i>died</i>. Might it not have sufficed if they had been only struck with a leprosy, as Uzziah, or struck dumb, as Zechariah, and both by the altar of incense? No; they were both struck dead. The wages of this sin was death. (2.) They died <i>suddenly</i>, in the very act of their sin, and had not time so much as to cry, “Lord, have mercy upon us!” Though God is long-suffering to us-ward, yet sometimes he makes quick work with sinners; sentence is executed speedily: presumptuous sinners bring upon themselves a swift destruction, and are justly denied even space to repent. (3.) They died <i>before the Lord</i>; that is, before the veil that covered the mercy-seat; for even mercy itself will not suffer its own glory to be affronted. Those that sinned before the Lord died before him. Damned sinners are said to be tormented <i>in the presence of the Lamb</i>, intimating that he does not interpose on their behalf, <a class="bibleref" title="Rev.14.10" href="/passage/?search=Rev.14.10">Rev. 14:10</a>. (4.) They died <i>by fire</i>, as by fire they sinned. They slighted the fire that came from before the Lord to consume the sacrifices, and thought other fire would do every jot as well; and now God justly made them feel the power of that fire which they did not reverence. Thus those that hate to be refined by the fire of divine grace will undoubtedly be ruined by the fire of divine wrath. The fire did not burn them to ashes, as it had done the sacrifices, nor so much as singe their coats (<a class="bibleref" title="Lev.10.5" href="/passage/?search=Lev.10.5">Lev. 10:5</a>), but, like lightning, struck them dead in an instant; by these different effects of the same fire God would show that it was no common fire, but kindled <i>by the breath of the Almighty</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Isa.30.23" href="/passage/?search=Isa.30.23">Isa. 30:23</a>. (5.) It is twice taken notice of in scripture that they <i>died childless</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Num.3.4,1Chr.24.2" href="/passage/?search=Num.3.4,1Chr.24.2"><span class="bibleref" title="Num.3.4">Num. 3:4</span>; <span class="bibleref" title="1Chr.24.2">1 Chron. 24:2</span></a>. By their presumption they had reproached God’s name, and God justly blotted out their names, and laid that honour in the dust which they were proud of.</p>
|
|||
|
|
<p class="tab-1">2. But why did the Lord deal thus severely with them? Were they not the sons of Aaron, the saint of the Lord, nephews to Moses, the great favourite of heaven? Was not the holy anointing oil sprinkled upon them, as men whom God had set apart for himself? Had they not diligently attended during the seven days of their consecration, and <i>kept the charge of the Lord</i>, and might not that atone for this rashness? Would it not excuse them that they were young men, as yet unexperienced in these services, that it was the first offence, and done in a transport of joy for their elevation? And besides, never could men be worse spared: a great deal of work was now lately cut out for the priests to do, and the priesthood was confined to Aaron and his seed; he has but four sons; if two of them die, there will not be hands enough to do the service of the tabernacle; if they die childless, the house of Aaron will become weak and little, and the priesthood will be in danger of being lost for want of heirs. But none of all these considerations shall serve either to excuse the offence or bring off the offenders. For, (1.) The sin was greatly aggravated. It was a manifest contempt of Moses, and the divine law that was given by Moses. Hitherto it had been expressly observed concerning every thing that was done that they did it <i>as the Lord commanded Moses</i>, in opposition to which it is here said they did that <i>which the Lord commanded them not</i>, but they did it of their own heads. God was now teaching his people obedience, and to do every thing by rule, as becomes servants; for priests therefore to break rules and disobey was such a provocation as must by no means go unpunished. Their character made their sin more exceedingly sinful. For the sons of Aaron, his eldest sons, whom God had chosen to be immediate attendants upon him, for them to be guilty of such a piece of presumption, it cannot be suffered. There was in their sin a contempt of God’s glory, which had now newly appeared in fire, as if that fire were needless, they had as good of their own before. (2.) Their punishment was a piece of necessary justice, now at the first settling of the ceremonial institutions. It is often threatened in the law that such and such offenders should be cut off from the people; and here God explained the threatening with a witness. Now that the laws concerning sacrifices were newly made, lest any should be tempted to think lightly of them because they descended to many circumstances which seemed very minute, these that were the first transgressors were thus punished, for warning to others, and to show how jealous God is in the matters of his worship. Thus he <i>magnified the law and made it honourable</i>; and let his priests know that the caution which so often occurs in the laws concerning them, that they must do so <i>that they die not</i>, was not a mere bugbear, but fair warning of their danger, if they did the work of the Lord negligently. And no doubt this exemplary piece of justice at first prevented many irregularities afterwards. Thus Ananias and Sapphira were punished, when they presumed to lie to the Holy Ghost, that newly-descended fire. (3.) As the people’s falling into idolatry, presently after the moral law was given, shows the weakness of the law and its insufficiency to take away sin, so the sin and punishment of these priests show the imperfection of that priesthood from the very beginning, and its inability to shelter any from the fire of God’s wrath otherwise than as it was typical of Christ’s priesthood, in the execution of which there never was, nor can be, any irregularity, or false step taken.</p>
|