8 lines
15 KiB
HTML
8 lines
15 KiB
HTML
|
<p>Here is, I. The great wickedness of the men of Gibeah. One could not imagine that ever it should enter into the heart of men that had the use of human reason, of Israelites that had the benefit of divine revelation, to be so very wicked. “Lord, what is man!” said David, “what a <i>mean</i> creature is he!” “Lord, what is man,” may we say upon the reading of this story, “what a vile creature is he, when he is given up to his own heart’s lusts!” The sinners are here called <i>sons of Belial</i>, that is, ungovernable men, men that would endure no yoke, children of the devil (for he is Belial), resembling him, and joining with him in rebellion against God and his government. Sons of Benjamin, of whom Moses had said, <i>The beloved of the Lord shall dwell in safety by him</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="Deut.33.12" href="/passage/?search=Deut.33.12">Deut. 33:12</a>), have become such sons of Belial that an honest man cannot lodge in safety among them. The sufferers were a Levite and his wife, and that kind man that gave them entertainment. We are strangers upon earth, and must expect strange usage. It is said <i>they were making their hearts merry</i> when this trouble came upon them, <a class="bibleref" title="Judg.19.22" href="/passage/?search=Judg.19.22">Jdg. 19:22</a>. If the mirth was innocent, it teaches us of what uncertain continuance all our creature comforts and enjoyments are; when we are ever so well pleased with our friends, we know not how near our enemies are; nor, if it be well with us this hour, can we be sure it will be so the next. If the mirth was sinful and excessive, let it be a warning to us to keep a strict guard upon ourselves, that we grow not intemperate in the use of lawful things, nor be transported into indecencies by our cheerfulness; for <i>the end of that mirth is heaviness</i>. God can soon change the note of those that are making their hearts merry, and turn their laughter into mourning and their joy into heaviness. Let us see what the wickedness of these Benjamites was.</p>
|
|||
|
|
<p class="tab-1">1. They made a rude and inso 37d6 lent assault, in the night, upon the habitation of an honest man, that not only lived peaceably among them, but kept a good house and was a blessing and ornament to their city. They beset the house round, and, to the great terror of those within, beat as hard as they could at the door, <a class="bibleref" title="Judg.19.22" href="/passage/?search=Judg.19.22">Jdg. 19:22</a>. A man’s house is his castle, in which he ought to be both safe and quiet, and, where there is law, it is taken under the special protection of it; but there was no king in Israel to keep the peace and secure honest men from the sons of violence.</p>
|
|||
|
|
<p class="tab-1">2. They had a particular spite at the strangers that were within their gates, that only desired a night’s lodging among them, contrary to the laws of hospitality, which all civilized nations have accounted sacred, and which the master of the house pleaded with them (<a class="bibleref" title="Judg.19.23" href="/passage/?search=Judg.19.23">Jdg. 19:23</a>): <i>Seeing that this man has come into my house</i>. Those are base and abject spirits indeed that will trample upon the helpless, and use a man the worse for his being a stranger, whom they know no ill of.</p>
|
|||
|
|
<p class="tab-1">3. They designed in the most filthy and abominable manner (not to be thought of without horror and detestation) to abuse the Levite, whom perhaps they had observed to be young and comely: <i>Bring him forth that we may know him</i>. We should certainly have concluded they meant only to enquire whence he came, and to know his character, but that the good man of the house, who understood their meaning too well, by his answer lets us know that they designed the gratification of that most unnatural and worse than brutish lust which was expressly forbidden by the law of Moses, and called an <i>abomination</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Lev.18.22" href="/passage/?search=Lev.18.22">Lev. 18:22</a>. Those that are guilty of it are ranked in the New Testament among the worst and vilest of sinners (<a class="bibleref" title="1Tim.1.10" href="/passage/?search=1Tim.1.10">1 Tim. 1:10</a>), and such as <i>shall not inherit the kingdom of God</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="1Cor.6.9" href="/passage/?search=1Cor.6.9">1 Cor. 6:9</a>. Now, (1.) This was the sin of Sodom, and is thence called <i>Sodomy</i>. The Dead Sea, which was the standing monument of God’s vengeance upon Sodom, for its filthiness, was one of the boundaries of Canaan, and lay not many miles off from Gibeah. We may suppose the men of Gibeah had seen it many a time, and yet would not take warning by it, but did worse than Sodom (<a class="bibleref" title="Ezek.16.48" href="/passage/?search=Ezek.16.48">Ezek. 16:48</a>), and sinned just <i>after the similitude of their transgression</i>. Who would have expected (says bishop Hall) such extreme abomination to come out of the loins of Jacob? Even the worst pagans were saints to them. What did it avail them that they had the ark of God in Shiloh when they had Sodom in their streets—God’s law in their fringes, but the devil in their hearts? Nothing but hell itself can yield a worse creature than a depraved Israelite. (2.) This was the punishment of their idolatry, that sin to which they were, above all others, most addicted. Because they liked not to retain God in their knowledge, therefore he gave them up to these vile affections, by which they dishonoured themselves as they had by their idolatry dishonoured him and turned his glory into shame, <a class="bibleref" title="Rom.1.24,Rom.1.28" href="/passage/?search=Rom.1.24,Rom.1.28"><span class="bibleref" title="Rom.1.24">Rom. 1:24</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Rom.1.28">28</span></a>. See and admire, in this instance, the patience of God. Why were not these sons of Belial struck blind, as the Sodomites were? Why were not fire and brimstone rained from heaven upon their city? It was because God would leave it to Israel to punish them by the sword, and would reserve his own punishment of them for the future state, in which those that <i>go after strange flesh</i> shall <i>suffer the vengeance of eternal fire</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Jude.1.7" href="/passage/?search=Jude.1.7">Jude 1:7</a>.</p>
|
|||
|
|
<p class="tab-1">4. They were deaf to the reproofs and reasoning of the good man of the house, who, being well acquainted (we may suppose) with the story of Lot and the Sodomites, set himself to imitate Lot, <a class="bibleref" title="Judg.19.23,Judg.19.24" href="/passage/?search=Judg.19.23,Judg.19.24"><span class="bibleref" title="Judg.19.23">Jdg. 19:23</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Judg.19.24">24</span></a>. Compare <a class="bibleref" title="Gen.19.6-Gen.19.8" href="/passage/?search=Gen.19.6-Gen.19.8">Gen. 19:6-8</a>. He went out to them as Lot did, spoke civilly to them, called them brethren, begged of them to desist, pleaded the protection of his house which his guests were under, and represented to them the great wickedness of their attempt: “Do not so wickedly, so very wickedly.” He calls it <i>folly</i> and <i>a vile thing</i>. But in one thing he conformed too far to Lot’s example (as we are apt in imitating good men to follow them even in their false steps), in offering them his daughter to do what they would with. He had not power thus to prostitute his daughter, nor ought he to have done this evil that good might come. But this wicked proposal of his may be in part excused from the great surprise and terror he was in, his concern for his guests, and his having too close a regard to what Lot did in the like case, especially not finding that the angels who were by reproved him for it. And perhaps he hoped that his mentioning this as a more natural gratification of their lust would have sent them back to their common harlots. But <i>they would not hearken to him</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="Judg.19.25" href="/passage/?search=Judg.19.25">Jdg. 19:25</a>. Headstrong lusts are like the deaf adder that stoppeth her ear; they sear the conscience and make it insensible.</p>
|
|||
|
|
<p class="tab-1">5. They got the Levite’s wife among them, and abused her to death, <a class="bibleref" title="Judg.19.25" href="/passage/?search=Judg.19.25">Jdg. 19:25</a>. They slighted the old man’s offer of his daughter to their lust, either because she was not handsome or because they knew her to be one of great gravity and modesty: but, when the Levite brought them his concubine, they took her with them by force to the place appointed for their filthiness. Josephus, in his narrative of this story, makes her to be the person they had a design upon when they beset the house, and says nothing of their villainous design upon the Levite himself. They saw her (he says) in the street, when they came into the town, and were smitten with her beauty; and perhaps, though she was reconciled to her husband, her looks did not bespeak her to be one of the most modest. Many bring mischief of this kind upon themselves by their loose carriage and behaviour; a little spark may kindle a great fire. One would think the Levite should have followed them, to see what became of his wife, but it is probable he durst not, lest they should do him a mischief. In the miserable end of this woman, we may see the righteous hand of God punishing her for her former uncleanness, when she played the whore against her husband, <a class="bibleref" title="Judg.19.2" href="/passage/?search=Judg.19.2">Jdg. 19:2</a>. Though her father had countenanced her, her husband had forgiven her, and the fault was forgotten now that the quarrel was made up, yet God remembered it against her when he suffered these wicked men thus wretchedly to abuse her; how unrighteous soever they were in their treatment of her, in permitting it the Lord was righteous. Her punishment answered her sin, <i>Culpa libido fuit, poena libido fuit—Lust was her sin, and lust was her punishment</i>. By the law of Moses she was to have been put to death for her adultery. She escaped that punishment from men, yet vengeance pursued her; for, if there was no king in Israel, yet there was a God in Israel, a God that judgeth in the earth. We must not think it enough to make our peace with men, whom by our sins we have wronged, but are concerned, by repentance and faith, to make our peace with God, who sees not as men see, nor makes so light of sin as men often do. The justice of God in this matter does not at all extenuate the horrid wickedness of these men of Gibeah, than which nothing could be more barbarous and inhuman.</p>
|
|||
|
|
<p class="tab-1">II. The notice that was sent of this wickedness to all the tribes of Israel. The poor abused woman made towards her husband’s lodgings as soon as ever the approach of the day-light obliged these sons of Belial to let her go (for these works of darkness hate and dread the light), <a class="bibleref" title="Judg.19.25" href="/passage/?search=Judg.19.25">Jdg. 19:25</a>. Down she fell at the door, with her hands on the threshold, begging pardon (as it were) for her former transgression, and in that posture of a penitent, with her mouth in the dust, she expired. There he found her (<a class="bibleref" title="Judg.19.26,Judg.19.27" href="/passage/?search=Judg.19.26,Judg.19.27"><span class="bibleref" title="Judg.19.26">Jdg. 19:26</span>, <span class="bibleref" title="Judg.19.27">27</span></a>), supposed her asleep, or overcome with shame and confusion for what had happened, but soon perceived she was dead (<a class="bibleref" title="Judg.19.28" href="/passage/?search=Judg.19.28">Jdg. 19:28</a>), took up her dead body, which, we may suppose, had all over it marks of the hands, the blows, and other abuses, she had received. On this sad occasion he waived his purpose of going to Shiloh, and went directly home. He that went out in hopes to return rejoicing came in again melancholy and disconsolate, sat down and considered, “Isa. this an injury fit to be passed by?” He cannot call for fire from heaven to consume the men of Gibeah, as those angels did who were, after the same manner, insulted by the Sodomites. There was no king in Israel, nor (for aught that appears) any sanhedrim, or great council, to appeal to, and demand justice from. Phinehas is high priest, but he attends closely to the business of the sanctuary, and will be no judge or divider. He has therefore no other way left him than to appeal to the people: let the community be judge. Though they had no general stated assembly of all the tribes, yet it is probable that each tribe had a meeting of their chiefs within itself. To each of the tribes, in their respective meetings, he sent by special messengers a remonstrance of the wrong that was done him, in all its aggravating circumstances, and with it a piece of his wife’s dead body (<a class="bibleref" title="Judg.19.29" href="/passage/?search=Judg.19.29">Jdg. 19:29</a>), both to confirm the truth of the story and to affect them the more with it. He divided it into twelve pieces, <i>according to the bones</i>, so some read it, that is, by the joints, sending one to each tribe, even to Benjamin among the rest, with the hope that some among them would be moved to join in punishing so great a villany, and the more warmly because committed by some of their own tribe. It did indeed look very barbarous thus to mangle a dead body, which, having been so wretchedly dishonoured, ought to have been decently interred; but the Levite designed hereby, not only to represent their barbarous usage of his wife, whom they had better have cut in pieces thus than have used as they did, but also to express his own passionate concern and thereby to excite the like in them. And it had the desired effect. All that saw the pieces of the dead body, and were told how the matter was, expressed the same sentiments upon it. 1. That the men of Gibeah had been guilty of a very heinous piece of wickedness, the like to which had never been known before in Israel, <a class="bibleref" title="Judg.19.30" href="/passage/?search=Judg.19.30">Jdg. 19:30</a>. It was a complicated crime, loaded and blackened with all possible aggravations. They were not such fools as to make a mock at this sin, or turn the story off with a jest. 2. That a general assembly of all Israel should be called, to debate what was fit to be done for the punishment of this wickedness, that a stop might be put to this threatening inundation of debauchery, and the wrath of God might not be poured upon the whole nation for it. It is not a common case, and therefore they stir up one another to come together upon the occasion with this: <i>Consider of it, take advice, and
|