2 lines
3.6 KiB
HTML
2 lines
3.6 KiB
HTML
|
<p>Manasseh was itself but one half of the tribe of Joseph, and yet was divided and subdivided. 1. It was divided into two parts, one already settled on the other side Jordan, consisting of those who were the posterity of Machir, <a class="bibleref" title="Josh.17.1" href="/passage/?search=Josh.17.1">Josh. 17:1</a>. This Machir was born to Manasseh in Egypt; there he had signalized himself as a man of war, probably in the contests between the Ephraimites and the men of Gath, <a class="bibleref" title="1Chr.7.21" href="/passage/?search=1Chr.7.21">1 Chron. 7:21</a>. His warlike disposition descended to his posterity, and therefore Moses gave them Gilead and Bashan, on the other side Jordan, of which before, <a class="bibleref" title="Josh.13.31" href="/passage/?search=Josh.13.31">Josh. 13:31</a>. It is here said that the lot came to Manasseh, <i>for he was the first-born of</i> Joseph. Bishop Patrick thinks it should be translated, <i>though he was the first-born of</i> Joseph, and then the meaning is plain, that the second lot was for Manasseh, because, though he was the first-born, yet Jacob had preferred Ephraim before him. See the names of those heads of the families that settled on the other side Jordan, <a class="bibleref" title="1Chr.5.24" href="/passage/?search=1Chr.5.24">1 Chron. 5:24</a>. 2. That part on this side Jordan as subdivided into ten families, <a class="bibleref" title="Josh.17.5" href="/passage/?search=Josh.17.5">Josh. 17:5</a>. There were six sons of Gilead here named (<a class="bibleref" title="Josh.17.2" href="/passage/?search=Josh.17.2">Josh. 17:2</a>), the same that are recorded <a class="bibleref" title="Num.26.30-Num.26.32" href="/passage/?search=Num.26.30-Num.26.32">Num. 26:30-32</a>, only that he who is there called <i>Jezeer</i> is here called <i>Abiezer</i>. Five of these sons had each of them their portion; the sixth, which was Hepher, had his male line cut off in his son Zelophehad, who left daughters only, five in number, of whom we have often read, and these five had each of them a portion; though perhaps, they claiming under Hepher, all their five portions were but equal to one of the portions of the five sons. Or if Hepher had other sons besides Zelophehad, in whom the name of his family was kept up, their posterity married to the daughters of Zelophehad the elder brother, and in their right had these portions assigned them. See <a class="bibleref" title="Num.36.12" href="/passage/?search=Num.36.12">Num. 36:12</a>. Here is, (1.) The claim which the daughters of Zelophehad made, grounded upon the command God gave to Moses concerning them, <a class="bibleref" title="Josh.17.4" href="/passage/?search=Josh.17.4">Josh. 17:4</a>. They had themselves, when they were young, pleaded their own cause before Moses, and obtained the grant of an inheritance with their brethren, and now they would not lose the benefit of that grant for want of speaking to Joshua, but seasonably put in their demand themselves, as it should seem, and not their husbands for them. (2.) The assignment of their portions according to their claim. Joshua knew very well what God had ordered in their case, and did not object that they having not served in the wars of Canaan there was no reason why they should share in the possessions of Canaan, but readily <i>gave them as inheritance among the brethren of their father</i>. And now they reaped the benefit of their own pious zeal and prudent forecast in this matter. Thus those who take care in the wilderness of this world to make sure to themselves a place in the inheritance of the saints in light will certainly have the comfort of it in the other world, while those that neglect it now will lose it for ever.</p>
|