mh_parser/scraps/1Sam_6_19-1Sam_6_21.html

2 lines
8.6 KiB
HTML
Raw Permalink Normal View History

2023-12-17 20:08:46 +00:00
<p>Here is, 1. The sin of the men of Beth-shemesh: <i>They looked into the ark of the Lord</i>, <a class="bibleref" title="1Sam.6.19" href="/passage/?search=1Sam.6.19">1 Sam. 6:19</a>. Every Israelite had heard great talk of the ark, and had been possessed with a profound veneration for it; but they had been told that it was lodged within a veil, and even the high priest himself might not look upon it but once a year, and then through a cloud of incense. Perhaps this made many say (as we are apt to covet that which is forbidden) what a great deal they would give for a sight of it. Some of these Beth-shemites, we may suppose, for that reason, <i>rejoiced to see the ark</i> (<a class="bibleref" title="1Sam.6.13" href="/passage/?search=1Sam.6.13">1 Sam. 6:13</a>) more than for the sake of the public. Yet this did not content them; they might see it, but they would go further, they would take off the covering, which it is likely was nailed or screwed on, and look into it, under pretence of seeing whether the Philistines had not taken the two tables out of it or some way damaged them, but really to gratify a sinful curiosity of their own, which intruded into those things that God had thought fit to conceal from them. Note, It is a great affront to God for vain men to pry into and meddle with the secret things which belong not to them, <a class="bibleref" title="Deut.29.29,Col.2.18" href="/passage/?search=Deut.29.29,Col.2.18"><span class="bibleref" title="Deut.29.29">Deut. 29:29</span>; <span class="bibleref" title="Col.2.18">Col. 2:18</span></a>. We were all ruined by an ambition of forbidden knowledge. That which made this looking into the ark a great sin was that it proceeded from a very low and mean opinion of the ark. The familiarity they had with it upon this occasion bred contempt and irreverence. Perhaps they presumed upon their being priests; but the dignity of the ministerial office will be so far from excusing that it will aggravate a careless and irreverent treatment of holy things. They should, by their example, have taught others to keep their distance and look upon the ark with a holy awe. Perhaps they presumed upon the kind entertainment they had given the ark, and the sacrifices they had now offered to welcome it home with, for which they thought the ark was indebted to them, and they might be allowed to repay themselves with the satisfaction of looking into it. But let no man think that his service done for God will justify him in any instance of disrespect or irreverence towards the things of God. Or it may be they presumed upon the present mean circumstances the ark was in, newly come out of captivity, and unsettled; now that it stood upon a cold stone, they thought they might make free with it; they should never have such another opportunity 19a7 of being familiar with it. It is an offence to God if we think meanly of his ordinances because of the meanness of the manner of their administration. Had they looked with an understanding eye upon the ark, and not judged purely by outward appearance, they would have thought that the ark never shone with greater majesty than it did not. It had triumphed over the Philistines, and come out of its house of bondage (like Christ out of the grave) by its own power; had they considered this, they would not have looked into it thus, as a common chest. 2. Their punishment for this sin: <i>He smote the men of Beth-shemesh, many of them, with a great slaughter</i>. How jealous is God for the honour of his ark! He will not suffer it to be profaned. <i>Be not deceived, God is not mocked</i>. Those that will not fear his goodness, and reverently use the tokens of his grace, shall be made to feel his justice, and sink under the tokens of his displeasure. Those that pry into what is forbidden, and come too near to holy fire, will find it is at their peril. <i>He smote</i> 50,070 <i>men</i>. This account of the numbers smitten is expressed in a very unusual manner in the original, which, besides the improbability that there should be so many guilty and so many slain, occasions ma